Intraoperative computed tomography during fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair with fenestrated or branched endografts is technically challenging, and proper intraoperative assessment of all stent graft components with only angiography and fluoroscopy can be difficult. Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging can be a valuable aid for the operators in the evaluation of stent grafting results prior to completion of surgery. PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of performing intraoperative CT imaging during fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (f-bEVAR) under sterile conditions and with patients under general anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intraoperative CT imaging was performed in 10 patients undergoing elective aortic repair with fenestrated or branched endografts. Adverse events, time consumption for CT set-up and image acquisition, and additional radiation dose to the patient were recorded. CT image quality was graded. Immediate corrective maneuvers performed based on the CT findings was registered. RESULTS: There were no adverse events related to intraoperative CT imaging. The median additional operating time by including intraoperative CT was 16 min (interquartile range [IQR] = 12-19), comprising 7% of the median total operating time. The median estimated additional radiation dose to the patient was 4.8 mSv (IQR = 3.8-4.9). All intraoperative CT examinations were considered to be of sufficient quality for stent graft evaluation. No immediate corrective procedures were performed on the basis of CT findings in this study cohort. CONCLUSION: CT imaging intraoperatively during f-bEVAR is feasible with an acceptable increase in operating time and radiation dose.

Portal Vein Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate-Glue: What Impact Does a Central Vascular Plug Have?

PURPOSE: To examine if the addition of a central vascular plug (CVP) to portal vein embolization (PVE) with N-butyl cyanoacrylate-glue (NBCA) increases future liver remnant (FLR) growth. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study of 115 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing PVE in 2013-2019. All patients were embolized with NBCA as the main embolic agent. In 2017-2019 NBCA was combined with a CVP in the central part of the right portal vein. Growth of the FLR and standardized FLR (sFLR) including degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR) were analyzed, as well as procedure data such as use of cone-beam CT (CBCT), dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time and contrast dose. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients (35%) underwent PVE with a combination of CVP and NBCA. The DH was higher in these patients after 4 weeks, mean 13.6% (SD 7.8) vs. 10.5% (SD 6.4; p = 0.022), verified in multivariate analysis (coefficient 4.1, p = 0.015). A CVP did not significantly increase the resection rate (90% vs 82%, p = 0.4). Cone beam CT was used in 65 patients (57%). Use of CBCT did not affect FLR growth, and fluoroscopy time and contrast doses were not different in patients having a CBCT or not. Slightly lower DAP (median 3375 vs. 4499 cGy*cm2; p = 0.09) was seen in procedures where CBCT was used. CONCLUSION: A CVP in addition to NBCA embolization was associated with increased growth of the FLR compared to NBCA alone.

Sarcopenia predicts reduced liver growth and reduced resectability in patients undergoing portal vein embolization before liver resection - A DRAGON collaborative analysis of 306 patients.

BACKGROUND: After portal vein embolization (PVE) 30% fail to achieve liver resection. Malnutrition is a modifiable risk factor and can be assessed by radiological indices. This study investigates, if sarcopenia affects resectability and kinetic growth rate (KGR) after PVE. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of the outcome of PVE at 8 centres of the DRAGON collaborative from 2010 to 2019. All malignant tumour types were included. Sarcopenia was defined using gender, body mass and skeletal muscle index. First imaging after PVE was used for liver volumetry. Primary and secondary endpoints were resectability and KGR. Risk factors impacting liver growth were assessed in a multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Eight centres identified 368 patients undergoing PVE. 62 patients (17%) had to be excluded due to unavailability of data. Among the 306 included patients, 112 (37%) were non-sarcopenic and 194 (63%) were sarcopenic. Sarcopenic patients had a 21% lower resectability rate (87% vs. 66%, p < 0.001) and a 23% reduced KGR (p = 0.02) after PVE. In a multivariable model dichotomized for KGR ≥2.3% standardized FLR (sFLR)/week, only sarcopenia and sFLR before embolization correlated with KGR. CONCLUSION: In this largest study of risk factors, sarcopenia was associated with reduced resectability and KGR in patients undergoing PVE.

Survival Outcomes After Portal Vein Embolization and Liver Resection Compared With Liver Transplant for Patients With Extensive Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

Importance: Portal vein embolization (PVE) has been implemented in patients with extensive colorectal liver metastases to increase the number of patients able to undergo liver resection. Liver transplant could be an alternative in selected patients with extensive liver-only disease, and we have recently shown promising survival outcomes. Objective: To compare overall survival (OS) among patients with colorectal cancer and high liver metastasis tumor load who were treated with liver transplant or with PVE and liver resection. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness research study assessed 50 patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases who were previously enrolled in liver transplant studies between November 2006 and August 2019 at Oslo University Hospital in Norway. Those patients were compared with a retrospective cohort of 53 patients in the Oslo University Hospital PVE database from March 2006 through November 2015 with similar selection criteria who underwent PVE and liver resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: The OS among patients with high tumor load after liver transplant was compared with that among patients with high tumor load who underwent PVE and liver resection. High tumor load was defined as 9 or more metastatic tumors or a diameter of 5.5 cm or longer for the largest liver lesion. Results: In the PVE cohort of 53 patients, the median age was 61.8 years (range, 34.3-71.3 years), and 36 patients (68%) were men. The 5-year OS rate among 38 patients who underwent liver resection after PVE was 44.6%. The 5-year OS rate for patients with high tumor load was 33.4% for those who underwent liver transplant and 6.7% for those who underwent PVE. Among patients with high tumor load and left-sided primary tumors, the 5-year OS rate was 45.3% for those receiving a liver allograft and 12.5% for those treated with PVE and liver resection. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with nonresectable disease, an extensive liver tumor load, and left-sided primary tumors had long OS after liver transplant, exceeding the survival outcome for those patients treated with PVE and liver resection.

How should liver hypertrophy be stimulated? A comparison of upfront associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and portal vein embolization (PVE) with rescue possibility.

BACKGROUND: The role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) in comparison to portal vein embolization (PVE) is debated. The aim of this study was to compare successful resection rates (RR) with upfront ALPPS vs. PVE with rescue ALPPS on demand and to compare the hypertrophy of the liver between ALPPS and PVE plus subsequent rescue ALPPS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients treated with PVE for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) or ALPPS (any diagnosis, rescue ALPPS included) at five Scandinavian university hospitals during the years 2013-2016 was conducted. A Chi-square test and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to assess the difference between the groups. A successful RR was defined as liver resection without a 90-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were included. Successful RR was in 84.5% of the patients with ALPPS upfront and in 73.3% of the patients with PVE and rescue ALPPS on demand (P=0.080). The hypertrophy of the future liver remnants (FLRs) with ALPPS upfront was 71% (48-97%) compared to 96% (82-113%) after PVE and rescue ALPPS (P=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Upfront ALPPS offers a somewhat higher successful RR than PVE with rescue ALPPS on demand. The sequential combination of PVE and ALPPS leads to a higher overall degree of hypertrophy than upfront ALPPS.

Segment 4 occlusion in portal vein embolization increase future liver remnant hypertrophy - A Scandinavian cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The additional value of including segment 4 (S4) portal branches in right portal vein embolization (rPVE) is debated. The aim of the study was to explore this in a large multicenter cohort. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study consisting of all patients subjected to rPVE from August 2012 to May 2017 at six Scandinavian university hospitals. PVE technique was essentially the same in all centers, except for the selection of main embolizing agent (particles or glue). All centers used coils or particles to embolize S4 branches. A subgroup analysis was performed after excluding patients with parts of or whole S4 included in the future liver remnant (FLR). RESULTS: 232 patients were included in the study, of which 36 received embolization of the portal branches to S4 in addition to rPVE. The two groups (rPVE vs rPVE + S4) were similar (gender, age, co-morbidity, diagnosis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bilirubin levels prior to PVE and embolizing material), except for diabetes mellitus which was more frequent in the rPVE + S4 group (p = 0.02). Pre-PVE FLR was smaller in the S4 group (333 vs 380 ml, p = 0.01). rPVE + S4 resulted in a greater percentage increase of the FLR size compared to rPVE alone (47 vs 38%, p = 0.02). A subgroup analysis, excluding all patients with S4 included in the FLR, was done. There was no longer a difference in pre-PVE FLR between groups (333 vs 325 ml, p = 0.9), but still a greater percentage increase and also absolute increase of the FLR in the rPVE + S4 group (48 vs 38% and 155 vs 112 ml, p = 0.01 and 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this large multicenter cohort study, additional embolization of S4 did demonstrate superior growth of the FLR compared to standard right PVE.

Can we ablate liver lesions close to large portal and hepatic veins with MR-guided HIFU? An experimental study in a porcine model.

OBJECTIVES: Invasive treatment of tumors adjacent to large hepatic vessels is a continuous clinical challenge. The primary aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of ablating liver tissue adjacent to large hepatic and portal veins with magnetic resonance imaging-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU). The secondary aim was to compare sonication data for ablations performed adjacent to hepatic veins (HV) versus portal veins (PV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRgHIFU ablations were performed in six male land swine under general anesthesia. Ablation cells of either 4 or 8 mm diameter were planned in clusters (two/animal) adjacent either to HV (n = 6) or to PV (n = 6), with diameter ≥ 5 mm. Ablations were made using 200 W and 1.2 MHz. Post-procedure evaluation was made on contrast-enhanced MRI (T1w CE-MRI), histopathology, and ablation data from the HIFU system. RESULTS: A total of 153 ablations in 81 cells and 12 clusters were performed. There were visible lesions with non-perfused volumes in all animals on T1w CE-MRI images. Histopathology showed hemorrhage and necrosis in all 12 clusters, with a median shortest distance to vessel wall of 0.4 mm (range 0-2.7 mm). Edema and endothelial swelling were observed without vessel wall rupture. In 8-mm ablations (n = 125), heat sink was detected more often for HV (43%) than for PV (19%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Ablations yielding coagulative necrosis of liver tissue can be performed adjacent to large hepatic vessels while keeping the vessel walls intact. This indicates that perivascular tumor ablation in the liver is feasible using MRgHIFU. KEY POINTS: • High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation is a non-invasive treatment modality that can be used for treatment of liver tumors. • This study shows that ablations of liver tissue can be performed adjacent to large hepatic vessels in an experimental setting. • Liver tumors close to large vessels can potentially be treated using this modality.

ALBI and P-ALBI grade in Child-Pugh A patients treated with drug eluting embolic chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Treatment outcome for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is related to tumor burden and liver function. Grading systems assessing liver function need validation in different clinical settings. PURPOSE: To evaluate drug-eluting embolic transarterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE) in Child-Pugh A HCC with respect to albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) and platelet-albumin-bilirubin (P-ALBI) grade. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients with Child-Pugh class A, diagnosed with HCC and allocated to DEE-TACE treatment, were retrospectively analyzed regarding tumor and treatment characteristics, radiological response (mRECIST) one month post treatment, overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs; CTCAE, grades ≥3) with respect to ALBI and P-ALBI grade. RESULTS: There were 21 ALBI 1 patients, 29 P-ALBI 1 patients, and 19 patients were both ALBI and P-ALBI 1. Objective response rate was 74% with no statistically significant difference for ALBI (1 vs. 2; P = 0.08), or P-ALBI (1 vs. 2; P = 0.49). OS was 14.8 months (range = 1.7-62.0; ALBI 1 vs. 2: P = 0.08; P-ALBI 1 vs. 2: P = 0.003). OS in responders with ALBI 1 and 2 was 28.9 vs.10.2 months ( P = 0.02), and P-ALBI 1 and 2 was 26.7 vs. 8.6 months ( P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, both ALBI 2 (HR = 2.4, P = 0.02) and P-ALBI 2 (HR = 3.3, P < 0.01) were negative prognostic factors for survival. There were 15 AEs in 13 patients, with hepatic failure only occurring in ALBI 2 and P-ALBI 2 patients. CONCLUSION: P-ALBI grade 1 and 2 differentiated survival in Child-Pugh A patients treated with DEE-TACE. Both grading systems can differentiate survival in patients responding to treatment.

Transarterial Chemoembolization of Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma Using Irinotecan-Loaded Beads: Treatment Response and Complications.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment response and complications of transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma (UM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with DEBIRI (n = 14) were retrospectively analyzed regarding overall survival, compared to patients (n = 14) treated with intravenous dacarbazine (DTIC). Median overall survival was calculated from time of diagnosis of metastatic disease (OS1) and start of treatment (OS2). Radiological response for DEBIRI was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), obtained 1.5 months (range 1.2-3.7) post treatment. Major complications of DEBIRI were defined according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification for complications by outcome. RESULTS: In the DEBIRI group, OS1 was 14.8 months (range 3.9-47.5), and OS2 was 9.4 months (range 1.7-39). Further, 11/13 (84.6%) of these patients had progressive disease on first follow-up CT and new lesions were seen in nine. There were 12 major complications in nine patients, possibly including one case of mortality due to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). CONCLUSION: For patients with liver metastases from UM, the effect on overall survival of DEBIRI alone is questionable. Compared to previous reports, the response rate of DEBIRI was poor, with new liver lesions observed in the majority of patients. Major complications possibly included one case of DIC.