Delivery of Mental Health Care in a Large Disaster Shelter.

Large numbers of evacuees arrived in Dallas, Texas, from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita just 3 weeks apart in 2005 and from Hurricanes Gustav and Ike just 3 weeks apart again in 2008. The Dallas community needed to locate, organize, and manage the response to provide shelter and health care with locally available resources. With each successive hurricane, disaster response leaders applied many lessons learned from prior operations to become more efficient and effective in the provision of services. Mental health services proved to be an essential component. From these experiences, a set of operating guidelines for large evacuee shelter mental health services in Dallas was developed, with involvement of key stakeholders. A generic description of the processes and procedures used in Dallas that highlights the important concepts, key considerations, and organizational steps was then created for potential adaptation by other communities.

The utility of capsule endoscopy and its role for diagnosing pathology in the gastrointestinal tract.

BACKGROUND: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a new device that enables visualization of areas of the small bowel that were previously inaccessible through other noninvasive procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate this new diagnostic tool and its efficacy in finding occult GI tract pathology. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was completed on patients undergoing CE from January 2002 to September 2004. Data evaluated included indications for CE, results of previous studies, CE findings, and complications of the CE study. RESULTS: A total of 702 CE studies in 652 patients were performed during the study period. Suspicious GI bleeding presenting as anemia, guaiac positive stools, or history of gross bleeding were the most common reasons to perform CE (75.8%). Other indications included abdominal pain (11.5%), diarrhea (3.1%), or others (9.5%). In studies performed for GI bleeding (N = 532), a source was found in 49.3% of CE studies. Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) was the most common reported finding (43.9%), followed by ulcer (24.1%), colon or gastric pathology (14.1%), mass/tumor (9.1%), and stricture (6.9%). Patients with abdominal pain (n = 81) had findings 46.9% of the time including edema/ulcer (47.4%), stricture (10.5%), mass/tumor (26.3%), gastric pathology (10.5%), AVM (2.6%), or sprue (2.6%). Patients with diarrhea (n = 22) had findings 45.5% of the time including edema/ulcer (75%), mass/tumor (12.5%), or sprue (12.5%). A total of 66 patients underwent operative exploration after a CE study at this institution either because of the observed findings or for other reasons. There were 12 (1.7%) CE studies in which the capsule was retained and required surgical removal. Pathology at the retention site included benign strictures or adhesions (n = 9, 75%), Crohn's stricture (n = 1, 8.3%) carcinoid tumor (n = 1, 8.3%), and villous adenoma (n = 1, 8.3%). CONCLUSIONS: CE is an accurate study to locate abnormalities in the GI tract that may have either been missed by previous diagnostic studies or cannot be observed through other non-invasive means. When used for diagnostic challenges such as GI bleeding with no apparent source, CE can be helpful in guiding surgical decisions in patients and thus should be integrated as part of the diagnostic workup.

Survival analysis following sentinel lymph node biopsy: a validation trial demonstrating its accuracy in staging early breast cancer.

Few long-term follow-up studies prove sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) effectively stages breast cancer without the further evaluation of a completion axillary dissection. Our prospective study addressed this issue, enrolling 345 women with clinically node-negative breast cancer who underwent SLNB from October 1997 through December 2000. The median age of the patients in the study was 56.7 years. Average primary tumor size was 1.42 cm. Ninety-three patients had a positive sentinel lymph node (27%); 70 (75.3%) of these patients underwent completion axillary dissection, while 23 patients (24.7%) declined further surgery. Most (91.3%) of the patients who declined further surgery had evidence of micrometastatic disease only. The median follow-up period for all patients was 60 months. No tumor recurrences in the axilla were reported in either sentinel node-negative or -positive patients. The local and systemic recurrence rates were 3.1% and 4% in node-negative patients and 2.2% and 4.3% in node-positive patients. Two patients (0.9%) in the node-negative group and 6 (6.5%) in the node-positive group died of their disease. Estimated 5-year disease-free survival rates were 96% for node-negative patients and 87% for node-positive patients (P = 0.02). The clinical false-negative rate of the SLNB in this study was 0%. This long-term validation trial proves the accuracy of the SLNB and its extremely low false-negative rate. The findings indicate that patients with a positive SLNB have significantly different survival rates than patients with a negative SLNB.

A prospective randomized trial demonstrating valved implantable ports have fewer complications and lower overall cost than nonvalved implantable ports.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether a totally implanted valved subcutaneous port system would have fewer complications as compared to a standard nonvalved port. METHODS: Study subjects requiring port placement were randomized to receive a valved port (PASV; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) or a nonvalved port (BardPort; Bard Accesss Systems, Salt Lake City, UT). Each port was placed with standard operative technique. Difficulty with blood return, excess time spent accessing the port, and required interventions were reported over the initial 180 days of port usage. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were randomized to receive either a valved port (n = 37) or a nonvalved port (n = 36). No major complications were identified from port placement, and there were no differences in rates of infection between the 2 ports. A reported inability to withdraw blood was noted in the valved port group on 21 of 364 (5.8%) port accessions and in the nonvalved port group on 37 of 341 (11%) accessions (P = 0.02). Significantly more total time was spent ensuring adequate blood draw from nonvalved ports as opposed to valved ports (750 minutes vs. 1545 minutes, respectively) (P <0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that the PASV valved port is associated with significantly fewer instances of poor blood return and less nursing access time, indicating that a port with a PASV valve may be superior to a nonvalved device.