Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 70(3): 463-8, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16157390

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to evaluate, in accordance with EUROCLEFT guidelines, the aesthetics of nasolabial area in a sample of complete unilateral cleft of lip and palate patients (UCLP), after surgical correction with Delaire' technique. METHODS: Twenty-two UCLP patients (16 males and 6 females, 9 right and 13 left side clefts) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were operated at 7 (mean value) months of age by a single surgeon. Frontal and sub-mental photos for each baby were recorded at 8.5 (mean value) years of age, and evaluated twice, by three independent maxillofacial surgeons. A five-point scale (EUROCLEFT guidelines) was used. Nonparametric analysis (Kruskal-Wallis test) was applied to detect differences in medians obtained in studied groups. RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistical significant differences among evaluations of three surgeons and between the first and the second evaluation of the same surgeon. The global appearance of the upper lip and nose was scored with a mean value of 2 (i.e. good). The sample was then divided into two subgroups, according with patient' age; the aesthetics and the symmetry of the nose resulted better in elder patients (i.e. subgroup A, mean period of observation=10.2 years), whereas upper lip achieved better results in younger patients (i.e. subgroup B, mean period of observation=4.9 years). CONCLUSIONS: EUROCLEFT guidelines are a useful method to evaluate--aesthetically and over time--cleft lip and palate patients, treated with a single surgical procedure. We hypothesize that Delaire technique could progressively improve aesthetics and symmetry of the nose, throughout the growth of the patient.


Subject(s)
Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Oral Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Plastic Surgery Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Craniofac Surg ; 16(3): 361-8, 2005 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15915098

ABSTRACT

Apert and Crouzon syndromes are well known craniostenosis. In the last 10 years several studies were performed to provide a better understanding of the etiology and pathogenesis of these diseases. Both have an autosomal dominant mode of transmission, and a mutation in the gene encoding for the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) is the cause in most patients. However, the fact that the same mutation can produce a wide range of phenotypic expression makes the mechanism of anomalous development more complex. The extracellular matrix (ECM) is composed of proteins, glycosaminoglycans, and cytokines that are secreted in an autocrine and paracrine manner and are able to modify the ECM. Fibroblast growth factors are complexed with heparan sulfate, a component of the ECM, before binding the FGFR2. Data exist about different expressions of cytokines and ECM macromolecule in craniostenosis-derived fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Changes in ECM composition could explain the altered osteogenic process and account for pathologic variations in cranial development in addition to the FGFR2 mutations.


Subject(s)
Acrocephalosyndactylia/genetics , Craniofacial Dysostosis/genetics , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Receptors, Fibroblast Growth Factor/genetics , Amino Acid Substitution , Extracellular Matrix/chemistry , Genes, Dominant , Humans , Osteogenesis/genetics , Point Mutation , Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2
3.
J Craniofac Surg ; 16(1): 71-8; discussion 78-9, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15699648

ABSTRACT

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a mechanotransduction process capable of generating viable osseous tissue by the gradual separation of osteotomized bone edges. Several variables are implicated in DO: magnitude of mechanical strain, distraction rate, and type of distracted bone. The combination of these factors acts on different types of cells inducing apoptosis, cell proliferation, and differentiation. The elucidation of the molecular mechanisms has important clinical implications because it may facilitate the use of recombinant proteins or gene therapy to accelerate bone regeneration. Previous reports have analyzed several molecules such as extracellular matrix proteins, cytokines, bone morphogenetic proteins, hormones, and angiogenic factors. Moreover, a single protein can have multifunctional roles. With such a huge number of mechanical, histologic, cellular, and molecular variables, there is the need to have a cell culture model that enables the selection of the effect of a specific strength to a single cell type at different time points and with or without cytokines. The analysis of the genetic profiling of a cell line cultured on an equibiaxial stretch device has such characteristic. Because there is a recruitment and commitment of preosteoblastic cells during bone lengthening and no previous report has focus on them, the authors used a preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cell line to detect the early molecular effects of distraction on mesenchymal cells. By using DNA microarrays containing 15,000 clones, the authors identified several genes the expression of which was significantly up- or down-regulated. The differentially expressed genes cover a broad range of biological processes: cell growth, metabolism, morphogenesis, cell communication, response to stress, and cell death. The data reported are the first genetic portrait of stretched preosteoblasts. They can be relevant in the better understanding of the molecular mechanism of DO and as a model for comparing the effect of distraction on different cell lines and primary cultures, rate and strength of distraction, and with or without cytokines.


Subject(s)
Bone and Bones/physiopathology , Osteogenesis, Distraction , 3T3 Cells , Animals , Apoptosis/physiology , Bone Regeneration/physiology , Bone and Bones/pathology , Cell Culture Techniques/instrumentation , Cell Differentiation/physiology , Cell Proliferation , Down-Regulation/genetics , Equipment Design , Gene Expression Regulation/genetics , Membranes, Artificial , Mesoderm/pathology , Mesoderm/physiology , Mice , Osteoblasts/pathology , Osteoblasts/physiology , Stress, Mechanical , Time Factors , Up-Regulation/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...