Employment of patients with kidney failure treated with dialysis or kidney transplantation-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with kidney failure treated with dialysis or kidney transplantation experience difficulties maintaining employment due to the condition itself and the treatment. We aimed to establish the rate of employment before and after initiation of dialysis and kidney transplantation and to identify predictors of employment during dialysis and posttransplant. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for studies that included employment rate in adults receiving dialysis or a kidney transplant. The literature search included cross-sectional or cohort studies published in English between January 1966 and August 2020 in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Data on employment rate, study population, age, gender, educational level, dialysis duration, kidney donor, ethnicity, dialysis modality, waiting time for transplantation, diabetes, and depression were extracted. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis for predictors for employment, with odds ratios and confidence intervals, and tests for heterogeneity, using chi-square and I2 statistics, were calculated. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020188853. RESULTS: Thirty-three studies included 162,059 participants receiving dialysis, and 31 studies included 137,742 participants who received kidney transplantation. Dialysis patients were on average 52.6 years old (range: 16-79; 60.3% male), and kidney transplant patients were 46.7 years old (range: 18-78; 59.8% male). The employment rate (weighted mean) for dialysis patients was 26.3% (range: 10.5-59.7%); the employment rate was 36.9% pretransplant (range: 25-86%) and 38.2% posttransplant (range: 14.2-85%). Predictors for employment during dialysis and posttransplant were male, gender, age, being without diabetes, peritoneal dialysis, and higher educational level, and predictors of posttransplant: pretransplant employment included transplantation with a living donor kidney, and being without depression. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with kidney failure had a low employment rate during dialysis and pre- and posttransplant. Kidney failure patients should be supported through a combination of clinical and social measures to ensure that they remain working.

Influence of Renal Transplantation and Living Kidney Donation on Large Artery Stiffness and Peripheral Vascular Resistance.

BACKGROUND: Vascular status following renal transplantation (RT) may improve while living kidney donation (LKD) is possibly associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. METHODS: We prospectively assessed glomerular filtration rate (mGFR, 51Chrome EDTA clearance) and intermediate vascular risk factors in terms of blood pressure (BP), pulse wave velocity (PWV), central augmentation index (AIx), excess pressure (Pexcess), and forearm vascular resistance in donors (n = 58, 45 ± 13 years) and recipients (n = 51, 50 ± 12 years) before and one year following LKD or RT. RESULTS: After kidney donation, mGFR decreased by 33% to 65 ± 11 ml/min/1.73m2, while recipients obtained a mGFR of 55 ± 9 ml/min/1.73m.2 Ambulatory 24-hour mean arterial BP (MAP) remained unchanged in donors but decreased by 5 mm Hg in recipients (P < 0.05). Carotid-femoral PWV increased by 0.3 m/s in donors (P < 0.05) but remained unchanged in recipients. AIx was unaltered after LKD but decreased following RT (P < 0.01), and Pexcess did not change in either group. Resting forearm resistance (Rrest), measured by venous occlusion plethysmography, increased after LKD (P < 0.05) but was unaffected by RT, while no changes were seen in minimum resistance (Rmin). ΔPWV showed a positive linear association to Δ24-hour MAP in both groups. Multiple linear regression analysis (adjusting for age, gender, and the baseline value of the studied parameter) did not detect independent effects of graft function on 24-hour MAP, PWV, AIx, vascular resistance, or Pexcess, whereas low post-donation GFR was related to higher AIx and Rrest. CONCLUSIONS: RT reduced BP and AIx without affecting PWV, whereas LKD resulted in increased PWV and Rrest, despite unchanged BP.

Arterial stiffness and peripheral vascular resistance in offspring of hypertensive parents: influence of sex and other confounders.

AIM: Established essential hypertension is associated with increased arterial stiffness and peripheral resistance, but the extent of vascular changes in persons genetically predisposed for essential hypertension is uncertain. METHODS: Participants from the Danish Hypertension Prevention Project (DHyPP) (both parents hypertensive) (n = 95, 41 ±â€Š1 years, 53% men) were compared with available spouses (n = 45, 41 ±â€Š1 years) using measurements of ambulatory blood pressure (BP), left ventricular mass index (LVMI), pulse wave velocity, central BP and augmentation index (AIx) in addition to forearm resting and minimal resistance [forearm resting vascular resistance (Rrest) and forearm minimal vascular resistance (Rmin)]. RESULTS: DHyPP patients with participating spouses had higher 24-h mean BP (94 ±â€Š1 vs. 88 ±â€Š1 mmHg, P < 0.01), LVMI (94 ±â€Š3 vs. 80 ±â€Š2 g/m, P < 0.01), central SBP (121 ±â€Š2 vs. 111 ±â€Š2 mmHg, P < 0.01) and AIx (16.0 ±â€Š1.2 vs. 10.5 ±â€Š1.7%, P < 0.01), but similar carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (7.5 ±â€Š0.2 vs. 7.1 ±â€Š0.2 m/s), Rrest (53 ±â€Š3 vs. 51 ±â€Š3 mmHg/ml/min/100 ml) and log Rmin (0.58 ±â€Š0.02 vs. 0.55 ±â€Š0.02 mmHg/ml/min/100 ml) when compared with spouses. Using multiple linear regression analysis (adjusting for sex, age, BMI, creatinine clearance and 24-h BP, heart rate and sodium excretion) AIx and LVMI remained elevated in DHyPP patients [4.2% (0.7; 7.7), P = 0.02 and 6.3 g/m (0.7; 11.9), P = 0.03]. For the entire DHyPP cohort AIx, Rrest and Rmin were higher in women than men (P < 0.01), and the same was true for AIx and Rmin among spouses (P < 0.05). Furthermore, AIx was linearly associated with Rrest and Rmin. CONCLUSION: Young to middle-aged individuals genetically predisposed for essential hypertension display increased AIx and LVMI, although vascular stiffness and peripheral resistance are still normal.

Estimated aortic blood pressure based on radial artery tonometry underestimates directly measured aortic blood pressure in patients with advancing chronic kidney disease staging and increasing arterial stiffness.

Central blood pressure (BP) can be assessed noninvasively based on radial tonometry and may potentially be a better predictor of clinical outcome than brachial BP. However, the validity of noninvasively obtained estimates has never been examined in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Here we compared invasive aortic systolic BP (SBP) with estimated central SBP obtained by radial artery tonometry and examined the influence of renal function and arterial stiffness on this relationship. We evaluated 83 patients with stage 3 to 5 CKD (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 30 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and 41 controls without renal disease undergoing scheduled coronary angiography. BP in the ascending aorta was measured through the angiography catheter and simultaneously estimated using radial tonometry. The mean difference between estimated central and aortic SBP was -13.2 (95% confidence interval -14.9 to -11.4) mm Hg. Arterial stiffness was evaluated by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) and was significantly increased in CKD patients compared with (versus) control patients (mean 10.7 vs. 9.3 m/s). The difference in BP significantly increased 1.0 mm Hg for every 10 ml/min decrease in eGFR and by 1.6 mm Hg per 1 m/s increase in cfPWV. Using multivariate regression analysis including both eGFR and cfPWV, the difference between estimated central and invasive aortic SBP was significantly increased by 0.7 mm Hg. For the entire cohort brachial SBP significantly better reflected invasive SBP than estimated SBP. Thus, tonometry-based estimates of central BP progressively underestimate invasive central SBP with decreasing renal function and increasing arterial stiffness in CKD patients.