Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 86(3): 598-606, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384835

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Knowledge is needed about the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) using contemporary immunosuppressive regimens. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the risk of cSCC in relation to medications used by SOTRs. METHODS: The cohort and nest case-control study included 3308 SOTRs and 65,883 persons without transplantation during 2009-2019. Incident cSCC was identified from pathology data, and medications were identified from pharmacy data. Adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards analysis, with voriconazole examined as a time-dependent variable. RESULTS: The annual incidence of cSCC was 1.69% in SOTRs and 0.30% in persons without transplantation. The adjusted hazard ratio of cSCC associated with lung transplant was 14.83 (95% CI, 9.85-22.33) for lung and 6.53-10.69 for other organs. Risk in Latinx persons was higher than in other non-White groups. Among lung recipients, the hazard ratio was 1.14 for each month of voriconazole use (95% CI, 1.04-1.26). Azathioprine use for ≥7 months, relating to mycophenolate mofetil intolerance, was associated with a 4.22-fold increased risk of cSCC (95% CI, 1.90-9.40). Belatacept and other immunsuppressive medications were not associated with risk. LIMITATION: The number of events was somewhat small. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge of risks and benefits in diverse patients can translate to improvements in care.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Lung Transplantation , Organ Transplantation , Skin Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/chemically induced , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Skin Neoplasms/chemically induced , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Transplant Recipients , Voriconazole
3.
J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec ; 8(1-3): 28-30, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30276121

ABSTRACT

Eosinophilic granulomatosis (EGPA), or Churg-Strauss syndrome, is a rare and necrotizing systemic vasculitis, which affects small-to-medium-sized vessels and often manifests with severe asthma and eosinophilia. We report a case of a 72 year-old male with a two-year lung-biopsy proven history of EGPA who presented with retiform purpura and patchy necrosis on his bilateral shins, which progressed to sharply demarcated, stellate ulcerations with surrounding erythema within two weeks. Laboratory work up revealed elevated anti-Cardiolipin IgM, rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein, although P-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (P-ANCA) and C-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (C-ANCA) were negative. Vascular studies revealed long anterior tibial and dorsalis pedis artery occlusion and severe small vessel disease in plantar digital arteries. Despite treatment with intravenous cyclophosphamide, pulse-dose methylprednisolone, and pentoxifylline, the patient experienced disease progression and limb threatening arterial thrombosis. This case highlights the importance of vascular and neuropathic sequelae that may result from untreated or undertreated EGPA in P-ANCA-negative patients without active pulmonary symptoms.

4.
Dermatol Surg ; 41 Suppl 10: S201-15, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26418686

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Undermining and hemostasis are basic surgical techniques that can have a significant impact on surgical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To review the mechanisms and techniques of undermining and hemostasis, with an emphasis on the advantages and limitations of each modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for articles with the keywords "undermining," "hemostasis," and "electrosurgery." RESULTS: Whether performing blunt, sharp, or electrosurgical techniques, undermining at the appropriate depth and width is necessary for tissue movement during closures. Both excessive and inadequate undermining can compromise surgical healing. Surgical hemostasis techniques include pressure, suture ligation, topical hemostatic agents, and electrosurgery. Dermatologic surgeons should select the appropriate amount and type of hemostasis for each procedure. Particular care should be taken in performing electrosurgery, given the potential for complications. CONCLUSION: Understanding and optimizing hemostasis and undermining will allow dermatologic surgeons to execute complex closures with minimal complications.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Electrosurgery , Hemostasis, Surgical , Hemostatics/administration & dosage , Skin Diseases/surgery , Administration, Cutaneous , Electrosurgery/instrumentation , Electrosurgery/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine , Hemostasis, Surgical/instrumentation , Hemostasis, Surgical/methods , Humans , Ligation/methods , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...