Radical Resection in Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Recurrence-Free Survival Rate and Definition of a Risk Score for Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Surgery with radical intent is the only potentially curative option for entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (EP-NETs) but many patients develop recurrence even after many years. The subset of patients at high risk of disease recurrence has not been clearly defined to date. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to define, in a series of completely resected EP-NETs, the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and a risk score for disease recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of sporadic pancreatic NETs (PanNETs) or small intestine NETs (SiNETs) [G1/G2] that underwent R0/R1 surgery (years 2000-2016) with at least a 24-month follow-up. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factor analysis was performed using the Cox regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 441 patients (224 PanNETs and 217 SiNETs) were included, with a median Ki67 of 2% in tumor tissue and 8.2% stage IV disease. Median RFS was 101 months (5-year rate 67.9%). The derived prognostic score defined by multivariable analysis included prognostic parameters, such as TNM stage, lymph node ratio, margin status, and grading. The score distinguished three risk categories with a significantly different RFS (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 30% of patients with EP-NETs recurred within 5 years after radical surgery. Risk factors for recurrence were disease stage, lymph node ratio, margin status, and grading. The definition of risk categories may help in selecting patients who might benefit from adjuvant treatments and more intensive follow-up programs.

Second primary neoplasms in patients with lung and gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Data from a retrospective multi-centric study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with sporadic neuroendocrine neoplasms may exhibit a higher risk of a second primary tumor than the general population. AIM: This study aimed to analyze the occurrence of second primary malignancies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 2757 patients with sporadic lung and gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, managed at eight Italian tertiary referral Centers, was included. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2019, a second primary malignancy was observed in 271 (9.8%) neuroendocrine neoplasms patients with 32 developing a third tumor. There were 135 (49.8%) females and the median age was 64 years. The most frequent locations of the second tumors were breast (18.8%), prostate (12.5%), colon (9.6%), blood tumors (8.5%), and lung (7.7%). The second primary tumor was synchronous in 19.2% of cases, metachronous in 43.2%, and previous in 37.6%. As concerned the neuroendocrine neoplasms, the 5- and 10-year survival rates were 87.8% and 74.4%, respectively. PFS for patients with a second primary malignancy was shorter than for patients without a second primary malignancy. Death was mainly related to neuroendocrine neoplasms. CONCLUSION: In NEN patients the prevalence of second primary malignancies was not negligible, suggesting a possible neoplastic susceptibility. Overall survival was not affected by the occurrence of a second primary malignancy.

A novel insight into the anticancer mechanism of metformin in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cells.

The antidiabetic drug metformin displays anticancer properties in several neoplasms. In pituitary NETs, aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) is up-regulated by the somatostatin analog octreotide. Metformin inhibited QGP-1 cell proliferation in a dose- and time-dependent manner, at concentrations similar to those achievable in treated patients (-31 ± 12%, p < 0.05 vs basal at 100 µM). Moreover, metformin decreased pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PAN-NETs) cell proliferation (-62 ± 15%, p < 0.0001 vs basal at 10 mM), without any additive effect when combined with octreotide. Both octreotide and metformin induced AIP up-regulation. AIP silencing abolished the reduction of mTOR phosphorylation induced by metformin and octreotide. Moreover, metformin decreased HSP70, increased Zac1 and AhR expression; these effects were abolished in AIP silenced QGP-1 cells. In conclusion, metformin acts as an anticancer agent in PAN-NET cells, its activity is mediated by AIP and its interacting proteins. These findings provide a novel insight into the antitumorigenic mechanism of metformin.

Clinical results of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after R0 surgery: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of SBRT for selected patients with isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after radical surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients treated with SBRT for isolated local recurrence from resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, after multidisciplinary board evaluation. Prescription dose was 45 Gy in 6 fractions for all patients. Primary end-point was freedom from local progression (FFLP). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and toxicity. Local control was defined according to RECIST criteria. Acute and late toxicity was scored according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and February 2015, 31 patients with isolated local recurrence of resected pancreatic cancer were treated with SBRT. Pancreato-duodenectomy (PD) was performed on 24 patients and distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 7 cases, all with radical resection (R0). Median local recurrence disease free interval (DFI) was 14 months. Median follow-up was 12 months. FFLP was 91% and 82% at 1 and 2-years, respectively. Median PFS was 9 months. Median OS was 18 months. At univariate analysis, OS was correlated with a DFI>18 months. No cases of acute G3 toxicity or greater occurred. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT seems to be an effective and safe therapeutic option for isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after surgery. Encouraging local control rate, very low toxicity profile and effective pain control suggest the crucial role of SBRT in the treatment of these long-survivors selected patients.

Can Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Be a Viable and Efficient Therapeutic Option for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma? Results of a Phase 2 Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients received a prescription dose of 45 Gy in 6 fractions. Primary end point was freedom from local progression. Secondary end points were overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicity. Actuarial survival analysis and univariate or multivariate analysis were investigated. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled in a phase 2 trial. Median follow-up was 13.5 months. Freedom from local progression was 90% at 2 years. On univariate ( P < .03) and multivariate analyses ( P < .001), lesion size was statistically significant for freedom from local progression. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8 and 13 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor size ( P < .001) and freedom from local progression ( P < .002) were significantly correlated with overall survival. Thirty-two (71%) patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer received chemotherapy before stereotactic body radiotherapy. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 19 months. Multivariate analysis showed that freedom from local progression ( P < .035), tumor diameter ( P < .002), and computed tomography before stereotactic body radiotherapy ( P < .001) were significantly correlated with overall survival from diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer with no G3 toxicity or greater and could be a promising therapeutic option in multimodality treatment regimen.

cAMP effects in neuroendocrine tumors: The role of Epac and PKA in cell proliferation and adhesion.

cAMP effects have been initially attributed to protein kinase A (PKA) activation. Subsequently, two exchange proteins directly activated by cAMP (Epac1/2) have been identified as cAMP targets. Aim of this study was to investigate cAMP effects in pancreatic-NET (P-NET) and bronchial carcinoids and in corresponding cell lines (QGP-1 and H727) on cell proliferation and adhesion and to determine PKA and Epac role in mediating these effects. We found that cAMP increased cyclin D1 expression in P-NET and QGP-1 cells, whereas it had opposite effects on bronchial carcinoids and H727 cells and it promoted cell adhesion in QGP-1 and H727 cells. These effects are mimicked by Epac and PKA specific analogs, activating the small GTPase Rap1. In conclusion, we demonstrated that cAMP exerted divergent effects on proliferation and promoted cell adhesion of different neuroendocrine cell types, these effects being mediated by both Epac and PKA and involving the same effector GTPase Rap1.

Sorafenib in patients with Child-Pugh class A and B advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective feasibility analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib has shown survival benefits in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Child-Pugh (CP) class A liver function. There are few prospective data on sorafenib in patients with HCC and CP class B. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive prospective series of 300 patients with CP class A or B HCC were enrolled in a dual-phase trial to determine survival and safety data according to liver function (class A or B) in patients receiving oral sorafenib 800 mg daily. [Results of this study were presented in part at the ASCO 2012 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, 19-21 January 2012. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (Suppl 4): abstract 306.] RESULTS: Overall progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9, 4.1 and 9.1 months, respectively. For patients with CP class A versus B status, PFS was 4.3 versus 2.1 months, TTP was 4.2 versus 3.8 months and OS was 10.0 versus 3. 8 months. Extrahepatic spread was associated with worse outcomes but taken together with CP class, liver function played a greater role in reducing survival. Adverse events for the two CP groups were similar. CONCLUSION: Although patients with HCC and CP class B liver function have poorer outcomes than those with CP class A function, data suggest that patients with CP class B liver function can tolerate treatment and may still benefit from sorafenib.

Response assessment in oncology: limitations of anatomic response criteria in the era of tailored treatments.

Evaluation of tumor response is a vital element in clinical oncology research, particularly in the development of new drugs. Tumor response also plays a significant role in treatment decisions made by clinicians in practice. The underlying concept of tumor response, however, was developed as a result of limited understanding of tumor biology coupled with restricted availability of both effective treatments and imaging modalities. In recent years, impressive advances have been made in the treatment of cancer. Groundbreaking advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of tumor growth and proliferation have been made. New biologic agents have been approved for the treatment of several malignancies and, in many cases, biomarkers have been identified that can help predict those patients who will benefit. Pre-operative chemotherapy is now established for a number of tumor types. Modern imaging technologies allowing functional characterization of tumors have been introduced into clinical practice. In this new therapeutic landscape, the existing concept of tumor response risks becoming an anachronism, and revision of the criteria used to define tumor response is warranted. In this paper, we critically review the limitations of the classic criteria for tumor response assessment, and briefly discuss the potential role of alternative methodologies in providing a new, functional definition of tumor response.

A phase II randomized multicenter trial of gefitinib plus FOLFIRI and FOLFIRI alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase and preclinical studies indicate that it may enhance CPT-11 cytotoxicity. This randomized phase II trial investigates the feasibility and efficacy of gefitinib and 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to FOLFIRI +/- gefitinib 250 mg daily p.o. Patients randomized to FOLFIRI + gefitinib without disease progression after 6 months continued to receive gefitinib alone until disease progression. RESULTS: From October 2002 to September 2004, 100 patients were enrolled. Twenty-three patients (47.9%) in the FOLFIRI arm and 23 (45.1%) in the FOLFIRI + gefitinib arm experienced an objective response. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.3 and 18.6 months in the FOLFIRI arm, and 8.3 and 17.1 months in the FOLFIRI + gefitinib arm, respectively. In the combination arm, grades 3-4 adverse events were experienced by 35 (67.3%) patients versus 25 patients (52.1%) in the FOLFIRI arm; 12 patients (23.1%) withdrew for an adverse event in the FOLFIRI + gefitinib arm and 5 (10.4%) in the FOLFIRI arm. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that adding gefitinib to FOLFIRI does not improve the efficacy of FOLFIRI regimen. These disappointing results could be related to the high toxicity observed that led to significant dose reductions and delays.

Primary resistance to cetuximab therapy in EGFR FISH-positive colorectal cancer patients.

The impact of KRAS mutations on cetuximab sensitivity in epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridisation-positive (EGFR FISH+) metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC) has not been previously investigated. In the present study, we analysed KRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA, MET, and IGF1R in 85 mCRC treated with cetuximab-based therapy in whom EGFR status was known. KRAS mutations (52.5%) negatively affected response only in EGFR FISH+ patients. EGFR FISH+/KRAS mutated had a significantly lower response rate (P=0.04) than EGFR FISH+/KRAS wild type patients. Four EGFR FISH+ patients with KRAS mutations responded to cetuximab therapy. BRAF was mutated in 5.0% of patients and none responded to the therapy. PI3KCA mutations (17.7%) were not associated to cetuximab sensitivity. Patients overexpressing IGF1R (74.3%) had significantly longer survival than patients with low IGF1R expression (P=0.006), with no difference in response rate. IGF1R gene amplification was not detected, and only two (2.6%) patients, both responders, had MET gene amplification. In conclusion, KRAS mutations are associated with cetuximab failure in EGFR FISH+ mCRC, even if it does not preclude response. The rarity of MET and IGF1R gene amplification suggests a marginal role in primary resistance. The potential prognostic implication of IGF1R expression merits further evaluation.

EGFR FISH assay predicts for response to cetuximab in chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Standardized conditions to distinguish subpopulations of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients more and less sensitive to cetuximab therapy remain undefined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from 85 chemorefractory CRC patients treated with cetuximab. Results were analyzed according to different score systems previously reported in colorectal and lung cancers. The primary end point of the study was identification of the EGFR FISH score that best associates with response rate (RR). RESULTS: Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the cut-off that best discriminated responders versus nonresponders to cetuximab was a mean of 2.92 EGFR gene copies per cell. This model showed sensitivity of 58.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 47.1-70.1) and specificity of 93.3% (95% CI = 80.6-100). EGFR FISH-positive patients (N = 43, 50.6%) had significantly higher RR (P = 0.0001) and significantly longer time to disease progression (P = 0.02) than EGFR FISH negative (N = 42, 49.4%). Other scoring systems resulted less accurate in discriminating patients with the highest likelihood of response to cetuximab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CRC patients with high EGFR gene copy number have an increased likelihood to respond to cetuximab therapy. Prospective clinical trials with a careful standardization of assay conditions and pattern interpretation are urgently needed.

Agreement between oncology guidelines and clinical practice in Italy: the 'right' program. A project of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

BACKGROUND: RIGHT (Research for the Identification of the most effective and hIGhly accepted clinical guidelines for the cancer Treatment) is a project promoted by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) to measure the concordance between oncology guidelines and clinical practice. The goal of this pilot phase was to develop and test a reliable process to measure this concordance nationwide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty Italian centers participated to the survey. Breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC): guidelines issued by AIOM in 2003 were selected. A total of 29 indicators linked to the process of care were abstracted. Patients who had their first visit at the oncology center between February 2004 and June 2005, with a diagnosis of invasive BC (stage 1 or 2), colon cancer (stage 3), rectal cancer (stage T3-4 or N1-2) or advanced CRC were enclosed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: One hundred and sixty-one patients (80%) were analyzed. On average, 93% of BC and 80.3% of colorectal patients received recommended care. These first results indicate that the RIGHT system provides a valid measurement of oncology care to assess agreement with guidelines. A second larger phase of this nationwide monitoring program will enable results to be generalized.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: integrating irinotecan into combination and sequential chemotherapy.

The chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has undergone a succession of refinements. Through the biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with folinic acid (FA), the use of infusional rather than bolus regimens and the combination of 5-FU/FA with other active agents (notably irinotecan), first-line response rates (RRs) of 40% can be achieved, with patients surviving up to 17 months. Significant benefits on survival are also seen with second-line chemotherapy. The question of how best to sequence combination chemotherapy was addressed in a recent trial in which patients were randomized to receive either an irinotecan-based combination with 5-FU/FA (FOLFIRI) followed by an oxaliplatin-based combination (FOLFOX), or the two regimens in the reverse order. In both arms, RRs were greater than 50% and median survival exceeded 20 months. The primary end point was time to progression after two lines of treatment, and this was not significantly different. However, the sequence FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX appears preferable because of the better tolerability of FOLFIRI in first-line use. Use of the sequence FOLFIRI/FOLFOX is also supported by the greater chance of a second-line response with FOLFOX. Concern has been expressed about the safety of irinotecan combined with bolus 5-FU/FA. Infusional regimens have a better risk/benefit ratio than bolus regimens. However, the adverse event profile with both approaches is manageable, and irinotecan plus 5-FU/FA can be considered one standard of care in metastatic CRC.

Irinotecan and raltitrexed: an active combination in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan and raltitrexed are active agents in metastatic colorectal cancer. Preclinical findings suggest a remarkable synergistic activity between the two drugs and the feasibility of this association has been shown in a recent phase I study. The aim of our phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of irinotecan and raltitrexed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer untreated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1998 to February 2000, 46 patients were enrolled. Patients received irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) on day 1 and raltitrexed 2.6 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 3 weeks, for up to nine courses. Tumour assessment was performed every three cycles. RESULTS: A total of 223 cycles of chemotherapy, with a median number of six (range 1-9) courses per patient, was administered. According to intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 46% (95% confidence interval 31% to 61%). The median duration of response was 21 weeks (range 11-> or =101), the median time to progression 27 weeks (range 1-> or =116), and the median overall survival 57 weeks (range 1-> or =130). The main toxicities were diarrhoea, with National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 in 26% of patients, grade 3/4 neutropenia in 20%, grade 3 nausea-vomiting in 13%, grade 3 asthenia in 11% and grade 3/4 transaminase elevation in 4%. CONCLUSIONS: Results achieved with irinotecan and raltitrexed show that this regimen is active, despite 'not-negligible' toxicity, and may represent a useful regimen for specific subgroups of colorectal cancer patients.

Clinical significance of neuroendocrine phenotype in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) describes a histologically heterogeneous group of tumours with variable clinical behaviour. Performance status, tumour stage and histological type have important prognostic implications, but clinical outcomes in individual patients remain unpredictable. A significant minority of NSCLCs (10%-30%) show neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation, and a number of studies have attempted to evaluate the therapeutic and prognostic significance of the expression of NE markers on the basis of the theoretical assumption that NE-differentiated tumours may be associated with an adverse prognosis and greater chemosensitivity. However, the results of these studies are conflicting: some have found that NE differentiation has a negative impact on survival, but others have failed to demonstrate any correlation with prognosis. Similar discrepancies have also been observed in terms of chemosensitivity. Nevertheless, these data are difficult to interpret because there is no gold standard defining NE differentiation, as is shown by the fact that the proportion of NE-differentiated NSCLCs varies according to the technique and marker used, although chromogranin A and synaptophysin show the best correlation with ultrastructural evidence of NE differentiation. In conclusion, there is no doubt that caution is required when interpreting the results of a number of studies questioning the clinical impact of the NE features of NSCLCs.

[Combination of 5-Fluorouracil and folinic acid--is it still the standard therapy for advanced colorectal carcinoma?]. / La combinazione di 5-FU/FA rappresenta ancora la terapia standard per il carcinoma del colon-retto in stadio avanzato?

After a long period in which the only therapeutic approach for the management of colorectal cancer was the optimization of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, the last few years have seen the emergence of newly active chemotherapeutic agents endowed with novel mechanisms of action, such as oxaliplatin (OHP), irinotecan (CPT11), raltitrexed and oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pro-drugs which can offer new therapeutic possibilities. The availability of these different classes of cytotoxic agents has introduced the possibility of combination chemotherapy. The most widely studied combinations are 5-FU/folinic acid (FA)/CPT11 and 5-FU/FA/OHP, both of which have been tested in two randomized studies. These trials consistently demonstrated that the addition of CPT11 or OHP to widely accepted infusional/bolus 5-FU/FA regimens is superior to the same 5-FU/FA schedule alone in term of response rate (rate of about > 50%) and time to progression. It's worth nothing that both trials with the combination of 5-FU/FA/CPT11 showed a significant survival benefit. Toxicity profiles were more pronounced with the combination therapies but the quality of life evaluation showed that the combinations had no negative impact on the evolution of the global health status over time. A current ongoing randomized study compares 5-FU/FA/CPT11 with 5-FU/FA/OHP in order to identify the best first-line chemotherapy. Preliminary results in terms of objective response and toxicity are similar for both treatments. Raltitrexed is a thymidilate synthase inhibitor with activity comparable to 5-FU and a convenient administration schedule. In our institution, we performed a phase II single center trial to assess the efficacy of the combination of raltitrexed and CPT11. The principal aim of the study was the overall response rate. We observed a very promising 51% overall response rate. Most relevant side effects were diarrhea in about 20% of patients, asthenia and vomiting. Two recent studies have assessed the efficacy and tolerability of raltitrexed-OHP combination therapy. The results showed that the combination is active (ORR: 46-62%) and tolerable. Promising results have also been obtained in phase I studies with the OHP/CPT11 combination. All these data need to be confirmed in phase II-III clinical trials. In conclusion, combination therapy with CPT11 plus 5-FU/FA produces a 2-3 month survival advantage over 5-FU/FA alone and represents the new reference in the first-line chemotherapy of colorectal cancer. The association of 5-FU/FA and OHP improves response rates and progression-free survival. The increase in toxicity of these combinations is predictable and reversible and does not compromise quality of life. These important data suggest that there is now a limited role for single-agent first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Oral doxifluridine plus levoleucovorin in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: There currently is no agreement regarding the appropriate treatment of elderly patients with advanced breast carcinoma (ABC). Doxifluridine (5-dFUR), a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, has been found to be effective in this entity, but its use is limited by neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity that are not observed when the oral formulation is used. The objective of this Phase II trial was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of oral 5-dFUR, biomodulated with levoleucovorin (1-leucovorin), in elderly patients (age > 70 years) with ABC. METHODS: 5-dFUR was administered orally at 600 mg/m2 twice daily for 4 consecutive days every 12 days, and oral 1-leucovorin was administered as 25 mg 2 hours before each 5-dFUR administration. Response was assessed every five cycles according to the World Health Organization criteria. In the presence of response or stable disease, the patients were treated for a maximum of 15 cycles. RESULTS: Seventy-three eligible patients were enrolled, 27 of whom had been pretreated with chemotherapy and/or hormonotherapy; all were assessable for response and toxicity after a median follow-up of 15 months. The objective response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval, 17.4-45.4). Regression predominantly occurred in the presence of soft tissue involvement (skin, lymph nodes, and breast). The median time to response was 2 months (range, 1-2 months) and the median response duration was 7 months (range, 2-17+ months). The median survival was 24 months (range, 2-42+ months). The treatment was very well tolerated, and the side effects were manageable and always reversible. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study show that 5-dFUR plus 1-leucovorin, both given orally, are associated with excellent patient compliance. Although the results are suboptimal in terms of an objective response, this characteristic could allow 5-dFUR to be used in elderly patients considered unsuitable for "aggressive" chemotherapy.

5-Fluorouracil, dacarbazine, and epirubicin in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: For patients with surgically untreatable neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), the optimal therapeutic approach remains undefined. Somatostatin analogs and interferons have failed to control neoplastic growth, and chemotherapy has been only moderately more effective. The authors' previous study of the combination of 5-fluorouracil (FU), dacarbazine (DTIC), and epirubicin (EPI) (the FDE regimen) documented good tolerability, but the results for tumor growth control were disappointing. In an attempt to improve these results, the authors conducted a preliminary trial of an intensified FDE regimen (FU 500 mg/m2 administered intravenously [i.v.], DTIC 200 mg/m2 i.v., and EPI 30 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 1, 2, and 3 every 3 weeks). METHODS: Thirty NET patients (15 male, 15 female; median age, 55 years; age range, 19-72 years) were enrolled, none of whom had previously been given chemotherapy. The histologic types of disease were gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors (n = 21, 6 carcinoid tumors and 15 pancreatic NETs), other carcinoid tumors (n = 3), other NETs (n = 4), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) (n = 1), and Merkel cell carcinoma (n = 1). Six patients had a syndrome related to endocrine hypersecretion. One hundred fifty-four therapy cycles were delivered (median, six per patient), and all patients could be evaluated for response on the basis of intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: There were 9 objective responses: 2 complete responses (in 1 patient with Merkel cell carcinoma and 1 with pancreatic NET) and 7 partial responses (in 3 patients with pancreatic NETs, 2 with other NETs, 1 with GEP carcinoid tumor, and 1 with MTC). The median duration of response was 10 months (range, 5+ to 24+ months). No reduction in symptoms was achieved among the six patients with endocrine hypersecretion syndrome. Levels of urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and serum chromogranin A were decreased in 50% and 14% of patients, respectively, who presented with abnormal baseline values. Treatment toxicity was acceptable and included nausea and vomiting, alopecia, leukopenia, and mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated that the FDE regimen may be at least as effective as other systemic regimens. Comparison of this experience with the authors' previous trial revealed a noteworthy increase in the activity of the intensified regimen, especially in GEP NETs (the most chemoresistant tumors). Continued clinical research to improve these results is highly justified.