Effectiveness of standard treatments in non-small-cell lung cancer with METexon14 skipping mutation: a real-world study.

Aim: To assess real-world clinical outcomes with standard therapies for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with METexon14 skipping mutation (METex14). Methods: In an oncologists-led retrospective review of medical records, data were abstracted and analyzed for patients initiating first-line (1L) systemic therapy after 1 January 2017. Results: In total 287 aNSCLC patients with METex14, the real-world best overall response rate was 73.4% for capmatinib (n = 146), 68.8% for immunotherapy (IO) monotherapy (n = 48), 52.0% for chemotherapy (CT, n = 30), and 54.8% for IO + CT (n = 63). As compared with capmatinib, patients receiving IO (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.57; 95% CI: 0.77-3.20; p = 0.220), CT (HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.19-4.85; p = 0.014) and IO + CT (HR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.35-4.04; p = 0.003) had higher rates of progression. Further, patients receiving CT (HR: 4.43; 95% CI: 1.54-12.75; p = 0.006) and IO + CT (HR: 3.53, 95% CI: 1.41-8.85; p = 0.007) had higher rates of mortality than patients receiving capmatinib. Conclusion: The study showed better clinical outcomes with capmatinib than other standard therapies in 1L setting for aNSCLC harboring METex14.

Real-world study that investigated the outcomes of different therapies used to treat non-small-cell lung cancer patients with mesenchymal-epithelial transition exon 14 skipping mutationWhat is this article about? A real-world study that investigated clinical outcomes in patients with diagnosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with mesenchymal-epithelial transition exon 14 (METex14) skipping­a rare form of genetic mutation­who received treatment with one of the commonly used therapies for this disease: immunotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy + chemotherapy combination and capmatinib, which is a highly selective inhibitor of MET tyrosine kinase protein involved in the growth of cancer cells.What were the results? The study showed that, in general, patients treated with capmatinib as the frontline therapy more frequently achieved a clinical response in the form of complete tumor resolution or tumor shrinkage, had a lower risk of disease worsening and lived longer than patients who were treated with immunotherapy, chemotherapy or immunotherapy + chemotherapy combination.What do the results of the study mean? This study suggests that capmatinib is effective in treating patients with aNSCLC with METex14 skipping who have not been treated with another anticancer therapy previously. It provides evidence to support the use of capmatinib in the frontline setting and may inform clinical decision-making in routine practice.

Real-world outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with MET Exon 14 skipping mutation and brain metastases treated with capmatinib.

Aim: To assess real-world clinical outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 skipping mutation and brain metastases (BM) who received capmatinib, a recently approved MET inhibitor, in routine US clinical practice. Materials & methods: Patient data were collected using a retrospective medical record review, led by participating oncologists. Eligible patients initiated treatment with capmatinib in any line, after BM diagnosis, between May 2020 and June 2021. Data on real-world overall response rate (rwORR) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were descriptively analyzed. Results: 68 eligible patients were analyzed. In patients treated with first-line (1L) capmatinib (n = 55), the rwORR was 90.9% systemically and 87.3% intracranially; median systemic rwPFS was 14.1 months. Among radiation-naive patients on 1L capmatinib (n = 20), rwORR was 85.0%, both systemically and intracranially; median systemic rwPFS was 14.1 months. Conclusion: This study showed substantial systemic and intracranial effectiveness for capmatinib in real-world setting; findings were consistent for RT-naive patients.

Real-world observational study of current treatment patterns and outcomes in recurrent or locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for recurrent or advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) has advanced in the past 5 years with immunotherapy (IO). This study sought to describe first-line (1L) aNSCLC treatment patterns and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective, multisite cohort study, community oncologists reported data for randomly selected stage IIIB/IV, EGFR-/ALK wild-type aNSCLC patients who initiated 1L systemic therapy from 01/01/2016 to 12/31/2019. Follow-up was through November 2020. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, disease response, progression, and death/last follow-up date were described. Overall response rate (ORR) was calculated using tumor measurements applying RECIST v1.1 guidelines. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from 1L initiation by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: 497 patients from 46 sites were included. The most common 1L regimens (%) were platinum-doublet chemotherapy plus IO (PDC+IO) (40.6%), PDC (29.4%), IO monotherapy (20.7%), and PDC+bevacizumab (6.2%). From 2016 to 2019, 1L PDC declined from 63% to 10%, whereas 1L PDC+IO increased from 14% to 58%. The ORRs were 64.9%, 32.9%, 60.2%, and 61.3% for 1L PDC+IO, PDC, IO monotherapy, and PDC+bevacizumab, respectively. Median 1L PFS/OS (months) was 15.6/26.5, 5.3/13.7, 17.8/not reached, 10.8/18.6, respectively, for PDC+IO, PDC, IO monotherapy, and PDC+bevacizumab. Among patients who received only 1L treatment (n = 299), 41.5% had no further therapy and were deceased. CONCLUSIONS: Although the 1L treatment paradigm has recently shifted to IO-based regimens, 41.5% did not survive past 1L. Median 1L PFS did not exceed 1.5 years and median OS remained limited across all 1L treatment groups, illustrating continued unmet aNSCLC therapeutic needs.