Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Trauma ; 29(10): e364-70, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26053467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The biomechanical difficulty in fixation of a Vancouver B1 periprosthetic fracture is purchase of the proximal femoral segment in the presence of the hip stem. Several newer technologies provide the ability to place bicortical locking screws tangential to the hip stem with much longer lengths of screw purchase compared with unicortical screws. This biomechanical study compares the stability of 2 of these newer constructs to previous methods. METHODS: Thirty composite synthetic femurs were prepared with cemented hip stems. The distal femur segment was osteotomized, and plates were fixed proximally with either (1) cerclage cables, (2) locked unicortical screws, (3) a composite of locked screws and cables, or tangentially directed bicortical locking screws using either (4) a stainless steel locking compression plate system with a Locking Attachment Plate (Synthes) or (5) a titanium alloy Non-Contact Bridging system (Zimmer). Specimens were tested to failure in either axial or torsional quasistatic loading modes (n = 3) after 20 moderate load preconditioning cycles. Stiffness, maximum force, and failure mechanism were determined. RESULTS: Bicortical constructs resisted higher (by an average of at least 27%) maximum forces than the other 3 constructs in torsional loading (P < 0.05). Cables constructs exhibited lower maximum force than all other constructs, in both axial and torsional loading. The bicortical titanium construct was stiffer than the bicortical stainless steel construct in axial loading. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal fixation stability is likely improved with the use of bicortical locking screws as compared with traditional unicortical screws and cable techniques. In this study with a limited sample size, we found the addition of cerclage cables to unicortical screws may not offer much improvement in biomechanical stability of unstable B1 fractures.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Bone Screws , Femoral Fractures/physiopathology , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Equipment Failure Analysis , Femoral Fractures/etiology , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Stress, Mechanical , Tensile Strength , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 94(8): 701-12, 2012 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22517386

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Indications for surgical meniscal repair are limited, and failure rates remain high. Thus, new ways to augment repair and stimulate meniscal regeneration are needed. Mesenchymal stem cells are multipotent cells present in mature individuals and accessible from peripheral connective tissue sites, including synovium. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the effect of implantation of synovial tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells on meniscal regeneration in a rabbit model of partial meniscectomy. METHODS: Synovial mesenchymal stem cells were harvested from the knee of one New Zealand White rabbit, expanded in culture, and labeled with a fluorescent marker. A reproducible 1.5-mm cylindrical defect was created in the avascular portion of the anterior horn of the medial meniscus bilaterally in fifteen additional rabbits. Allogenic synovial mesenchymal stem cells suspended in phosphate-buffered saline solution were implanted into the right knees, and phosphate-buffered saline solution alone was placed in the left knees. Meniscal regeneration was evaluated histologically at four, twelve, and twenty-four weeks for (1) quantity and (2) quality (with use of an established three-component scoring system). A similar procedure was performed in four additional rabbits with use of green fluorescent protein-positive synovial mesenchymal stem cells for the purpose of tracking progeny following implantation. RESULTS: The quantity of regenerated tissue in the group that had implantation of synovial mesenchymal stem cells was greater at all end points, reaching significance at four and twelve weeks (p < 0.05). Tissue quality scores were also superior in knees treated with mesenchymal stem cells compared with controls at all end points, achieving significance at twelve and twenty-four weeks (3.8 versus 2.8 at four weeks [p = 0.29], 5.7 versus 1.7 at twelve weeks [p = 0.008], and 6.0 versus 3.9 at twenty-four weeks [p = 0.021]). Implanted cells adhered to meniscal defects and were observed in the regenerated tissue, where they differentiated into type-I and II collagen-expressing cells, at up to twenty-four weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Synovial mesenchymal stem cells adhere to sites of meniscal injury, differentiate into cells resembling meniscal fibrochondrocytes, and enhance both quality and quantity of meniscal regeneration.


Subject(s)
Menisci, Tibial/physiology , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Regeneration , Synovial Membrane/transplantation , Wounds and Injuries/surgery , Animals , Menisci, Tibial/surgery , Models, Animal , Rabbits , Tissue and Organ Harvesting , Transplantation, Homologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...