Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
J Med Screen ; 28(4): 472-479, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33567993

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare, in a primary human papillomavirus screening setting, two different validated human papillomavirus tests, considering their analytical and clinical screening performances. METHODS: In Tuscany, a human papillomavirus screening program was implemented in 2013. Hybrid capture 2 (Qiagen) was used for testing until May 2016, when it was replaced by the cobas® 4800 human papillomavirus test (Cobas; Roche). We evaluated the performance of Hybrid capture 2 and Cobas on: the same screening population in two different periods (before and after changing to Cobas); the same Hybrid capture 2-positive consecutive samples. Discordant samples (Hybrid capture 2-positive/Cobas negative) were typed on the L1 gene (reverse line blot, AB Analitica) and E6/E7 genes (BD Onclarity assay). RESULTS: In the considered time period (n = 37,775), human papillomavirus positivity was 9.8% and 7.4%, respectively, for Hybrid capture 2 and Cobas (p < 0.0001). At immediate colposcopy, the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 2 positive predictive value was, respectively, 23.8% and 34% (p < 0.001). At one-year recall, human papillomavirus persistence was, respectively, 40.6% and 62.2% (p < 0.0001). Of Hybrid capture 2-positive re-tested samples (n = 620), 32.4% were Cobas negative. Of discordant samples typed on L1, 7% were positive for the 12 high-risk human papillomavirus. Of the samples found to be negative for the 12 high-risk human papillomavirus types on L1, 14.5% were positive on E6/E7 typing. Among the discordant samples, the only two cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 lesions were non-high-risk human papillomavirus positive on both L1 and E6/E7 typing. CONCLUSION: At baseline, Hybrid capture 2 showed greater human papillomavirus positivity and a lower CIN2+ positive predictive value than Cobas, which was more specific than Hybrid capture 2 in detection of high-risk human papillomavirus: 80% of discordant samples were confirmed as high-risk human papillomavirus negative. This higher analytical specificity determined the non-identification of two CIN3 lesions.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Papillomavirus Infections , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , DNA, Viral , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis
2.
J Clin Virol ; 84: 74-81, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27728850

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A randomized trial was conducted in Tuscany, Italy, to evaluate the effectiveness of HPV vaccination for 25year old (yo) women who attend at the first time cervical cancer screening. The trial also evaluated immune response after vaccination, reductions of cytological abnormalities and the impact of vaccination on screening activity. STUDY DESIGN: During 2010-2011, all 25 yo women who were invited to the Florence cervical cancer screening programme were also asked to participate in the trial. Enrolled women were randomized into study and control groups. Those in the study group were offered HPV vaccination after the usual Pap test. The cytology distribution and prevalence for any high risk (hr) HPV type were compared at the subsequent screening round in an intention-to-treat analysis. The impact of HPV vaccination was evaluated per protocol comparing vaccinated women with the control group. RESULTS: Our results showed a reduction in HPV prevalence at recall for any hr-HPV type but it was not statistically significant, being 17.1% vs 21.4%, p=0.20 in the study and control groups, respectively. If we restricted the analysis to vaccinated women, strong reductions of the HPV 16,18,31,33,45 and HPV 31,33,45 infections were observed, being 5.3% vs 12.8%, p<0.01 and 2.1% vs 6.5%, p=0.02, respectively. Significant reductions for any hr-HPV infection and for HPV 16 infection were also observed in women HPV 16/18 negative at enrolment, being 12% vs 21.4%, p<0.01 and 0.6% vs 6.7%, p-value<0.01, respectively. In women hr-HPV negative at enrolment no infections due to HPV 16 or HPV 18 were observed and there was a big reduction for any hr-HPV infection (7.1% vs 21.4% p<0.01). A strong antibody response was observed not only for HPV 16 & 18 but also for their related types. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that HPV vaccination at the age 25 is beneficial if it is offered to hr-HPV negative women. Our data will assist in developing a cost effectiveness model for choosing the best strategy to integrate screening and vaccination for the coming years. Clinical trial registration number is NCT02296255.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Human papillomavirus 16 , Human papillomavirus 18 , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Human papillomavirus 16/immunology , Human papillomavirus 16/isolation & purification , Human papillomavirus 18/immunology , Human papillomavirus 18/isolation & purification , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Papanicolaou Test , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Prevalence , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaccination/economics , Vaginal Smears , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
3.
J Med Screen ; 22(1): 38-48, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25431452

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We present the results of the first screening round and the first year of the second round of the Valcamonica Human Papillomavirus (HPV) pilot screening project. SETTING: From 2010 to 2012, the entire target female population (aged 25-64) was invited to the first HPV screening round in an area where Pap test screening had been active since 2002. METHODS: For HPV-negative women, the interval was three years. For HPV-positive women, a cytological smear was stained and interpreted. Positive cytologies were referred to colposcopy; negatives were referred to repeat HPV after one year. If HPV was persistently positive, women were referred to colposcopy; if negative, to normal screening. RESULTS: In 2010-12 18728 women were screened, slightly higher participation than with Pap test (18233 64.7%); 1633 were HPV-positive (8.7%); 843 were positive at cytology triage (referral rate at baseline 4.5%). Of those referred at the one year HPV test, 84% complied (660/780); 356 were persistently positive (1.9%). The total referral rate was 6.4% compared with 3.7% for the Pap test. The detection rate was 9.2/1000 compared with 5.0% for the Pap test. The HPV positivity rate during the second round in women previously negative was 3.9% and the detection rate in HPV-positive cytology-positive women was 0.8/1000. CONCLUSIONS: HPV-based screening increases colposcopies at the first round, but also strongly increases the detection rate. At the second round, HPV prevalence was much lower and the detection rate also fell, corroborating the need for longer screening intervals in HPV-negative women.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Colposcopy , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Referral and Consultation , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
4.
Br J Cancer ; 109(7): 1766-74, 2013 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24008667

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The follow-up after abnormal Pap smear and negative colposcopy is not clearly defined. This study aimed at investigating the role of hr-HPV testing in the management of abnormal Pap test and negative colposcopy for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). methods: The study enrolled 1029 women with abnormal screening cytology (years 2006-2010) and negative colposcopy for CIN2+, which subsequently performed a hr-HPV test. Incident CIN2+ lesions were identified through linkage with cancer registry, hospital discharge records, neoplastic pathology reports and the archive of screening programme (2006-2011). RESULTS: During the follow-up, the cohort developed 133 CIN2+ lesions; only one among hr-HPV-negative women. The probability of developing CIN2+ on follow-up time was 0.44% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1-3.1) and 41.8% (95% CI 31.8-53.5) for hr-HPV-negative women and hr-HPV-positive women, respectively. A woman with a positive hr-HPV test had about 105 times higher probability of developing a CIN2+ lesion than a woman with a negative hr-HPV test (hazard ratio (HR)=104.5, 95% CI 14.5-755.1), adjusted for index Pap test result, age and cervix squamocolumnar junction visualisation. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that hr-HPV testing is able to select the real group of women at risk of developing CIN2+ lesions in the follow-up of abnormal cytology and first negative colposcopy.


Subject(s)
Colposcopy , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Vaginal Smears , Adult , Cytological Techniques , DNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
5.
J Med Virol ; 85(1): 83-90, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23124863

ABSTRACT

The Arg/Arg genotype versus Arg/Pro or Pro/Pro at codon 72 of the p53 gene in association with human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 E6 variants has been implicated as a risk marker in cervical neoplasia. However, research on this topic has produced controversial results. The association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism alone and in combination with specific HPV 16 E6 variants with risk of developing squamous intraepithelial cervical lesion has been investigated in low and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and in HPV-negative controls from an Italian population. The data obtained showed statistically significant different distribution of p53 genotypes between healthy controls and precursor lesions, with the p53 arginine homozygous increased in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. The T350G HPV 16 variant was the most frequent variant observed in the analyzed group of Italian women, showing a slight decreasing with the severity of the lesion. At the same time, the number of the prototype T350 slightly increased with the severity of the cytological lesions. In conclusion, p53 arginine homozygous was found to be increased in high-grade lesions, supporting the results of previous investigations indicating that HPV-positive patients with p53 Arg/Arg have an increased risk of developing pre-cancerous lesions. In addition, T350G HPV 16 variant was over-represented in p53 Arg homozygous women with cervical lesions. When p53 genotype and HPV 16 variants are considered together, no difference emerges between cases and controls so is not possible to assess that the oncogenic effect of HPV 16 T350G variant may be influenced by the p53 genotype.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/virology , Oncogene Proteins, Viral/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Polymorphism, Genetic , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adult , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Italy , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/genetics , Neoplasms, Squamous Cell/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Risk Factors
6.
J Clin Microbiol ; 49(4): 1446-51, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21325553

ABSTRACT

Randomized trials have produced sound evidence about the efficacy of screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA tests in reducing cervical cancer incidence and mortality. We evaluated the clinical performance and reproducibility of the Abbott RealTime High Risk (HR) HPV test compared with that of the HR hybrid capture 2 (HC2) assay as assessed by a noninferiority score test. A random sample of 998 cervical specimens (914 specimens of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia less severe than grade 2 [

Subject(s)
Mass Screening/methods , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Virology/methods , Adult , Cervix Uteri/virology , Female , Humans , Italy , Middle Aged , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Br J Cancer ; 104(2): 248-54, 2011 Jan 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21179038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Italy, cervical cancer screening programmes actively invite women aged 25-64 years. Programmes are hindered by low participation. METHODS: A sample of non-responder women aged 35-64 years, belonging to three different programmes (in Rome, Florence and Teramo), was randomly split into four arms: two control groups received standard recall letters to perform either Pap-test (first group) or human papillomavirus (HPV) test (second group) at the clinic. A third arm was sent letters offering a self-sampler for HPV testing, to be requested by phone, whereas a fourth group was directly sent the self-samplers home. RESULTS: Compliance with standard recall was 13.9% (N619). Offering HPV test at the clinic had a nonsignificant effect on compliance (N616, relative risk (RR)=1.08; 95% CI=0.82-1.41). Self-sampler at request had the poorest performance, 8.7% (N622, RR=0.62; 95% CI=0.45-0.86), whereas direct mailing of the self-sampler registered the highest compliance: 19.6% (N616, RR=1.41; 95% CI=1.10-1.82). This effect on compliance was observed only in urban areas, Florence and Rome (N438, RR=1.69; 95% CI=1.24-2.30), but not in Abruzzo (N178, RR=0.95; 95% CI=0.61-1.50), a prevalently rural area. CONCLUSIONS: Mailing self-samplers to non-responders may increase compliance as compared with delivering standard recall letters. Nevertheless, effectiveness is context specific and the strategy costs should be carefully considered.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Mass Screening , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Humans , Italy , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Compliance , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaginal Smears
8.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 35(9): 541-4, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17703457

ABSTRACT

Within a multicentre controlled trial framework, an external quality control (EQC) was scheduled to evaluate the interlaboratory reproducibility of liquid-based cytology. In particular, this EQC intended to evaluate the reproducibility of the ASCUS diagnosis.A selected set of 30 slides (4 within normal limit cases, 16 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance; 4 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 6 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions) circulated among the 13 laboratories involved in the trial.Kappa values were obtained from the comparison between individual laboratory diagnoses and majority diagnoses with target diagnoses. Specific kappa values resulted moderate to high for HSIL and low to moderate for LSIL and WNL. Meanwhile, the specific kappa for ASCUS was below 0.4 in 12 of 13 participating laboratories. The lack of reproducibility for ASCUS was not a result of the introduction of this new technology but rather to the low reproducibility of the ASCUS category itself stemming from intrinsic uncertainties in the reporting criteria.


Subject(s)
Cytological Techniques/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Smears/methods , Vaginal Smears/standards , Cytological Techniques/standards , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results
9.
Cytopathology ; 17(6): 353-60, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17168918

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-laboratory reproducibility for atypical glandular cells (AGC) (The Bethesda System (TBS) 2001) of the laboratories involved in the screening programmes in Italy. METHODS: A set of 35 selected slides were circulated among 167 laboratories involved in local population-based cervical screening programmes. Each laboratory provided one single diagnosis per smear. The smears were read blind to the original diagnosis and to the diagnoses provided by other laboratories. A 'majority' diagnosis was defined for each case and assumed as the reference standard. The diagnosis provided from each laboratory was compared with the majority diagnosis. RESULTS: According to the majority report the 35 slides in the set were classified as negative in nine cases, AGC in eight, adenocarcinoma in eight, and squamous lesion or squamous + glandular lesion in 10. The crude agreement between all pairs of laboratories was 49.43%. K-values were 0.46, 0.21, 0.34, 0.36 and 0.32 for negative, AGC/AIS (adenocarcinoma in situ of endocervix), AdenoCa, Sq/Sq + Gl and all reporting categories respectively. Concordance according to overall K was moderate to substantial in 77% of the participating laboratories. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the AGC category is not easily reproducible. The data confirmed the importance, in a screening scenario, of AGC/AIS diagnoses, but also presented difficulties in differentiating between the two diagnoses. In addition to the results obtained from the circulation of the slides, laboratories which had annually a low number of cervical smears were able to gain experience focused on particular morphological pictures.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/cytology , Mass Screening/methods , Vaginal Smears/methods , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Vaginal Smears/standards
10.
Breast ; 15(1): 44-51, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16076556

ABSTRACT

The inter- and intraobserver agreement (K statistic) in reporting according to BI-RADS assessment categories was tested on 12 dedicated breast radiologists, with little prior working knowledge of BI-RADS, reading a set of 50 lesions (29 malignant, 21 benign). Intraobserver agreement (four categories: R2, R3, R4, R5) was fair (0.21-0.40), moderate (0.41-0.60), substantial (0.61-0.80) or almost perfect (>0.80) for one, two, five or four radiologists, or (six categories: R2, R3, R4a, R4b, R4c, R5) fair, moderate, substantial or almost perfect for three, three, three or three radiologists, respectively. Interobserver agreement (four categories) was fair, moderate or substantial for three, six, or three radiologists, or (six categories) slight, fair or moderate for one, six, or five radiologists. Major disagreement occurred for intermediate categories (R3=0.12, R4=0.25, R4a=0.08, R4b=0.07, R4c=0.10). We found insufficient intra- and interobserver consistency of breast radiologists in reporting BI-RADS assessment categories. Although training may improve these results, simpler alternative reporting methods (systems), focused on clinical decision-making, should be explored.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Mammography/standards , Female , Humans , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 33(6): 387-93, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16299751

ABSTRACT

The CellSlide Processor (Menarini Diagnostics) is an automatic computer-controlled instrument, designed to prepare standardized, thin-layer cytological preparations using a filtration process. In this report, this new processor has been tested in a multicentric investigation, designed to evaluate cell recovery, cellular morphology and possible time saved in reading the slide. The results of this study show that the CellSlide processing system is suitable for use in the preparation of liquid-based gynaecology samples. Furthermore, the high-quality smear produced by the CellSlide decreases the reading time by approximately 20-25%.


Subject(s)
Histocytochemistry/instrumentation , Vaginal Smears , Histocytochemistry/methods
12.
Breast ; 14(4): 269-75, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16085233

ABSTRACT

The inter- and intraobserver agreement (kappa-statistic) in reporting according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS((R))) breast density categories was tested in 12 dedicated breast radiologists reading a digitized set of 100 two-view mammograms. Average intraobserver agreement was substantial (kappa=0.71, range 0.32-0.88) on a four-grade scale (D1/D2/D3/D4) and almost perfect (kappa=0.81, range 0.62-1.00) on a two-grade scale (D1-2/D3-4). Average interobserver agreement was moderate (kappa=0.54, range 0.02-0.77) on a four-grade scale and substantial (kappa=0.71, range 0.31-0.88) on a two-grade scale. Major disagreement was found for intermediate categories (D2=0.25, D3=0.28). Categorization of breast density according to BI-RADS is feasible and consistency is good within readers and reasonable between readers. Interobserver inconsistency does occur, and checking the adoption of proper criteria through a proficiency test and appropriate training might be useful. As inconsistency is probably due to erroneous perception of classification criteria, standard sets of reference images should be made available for training.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/standards , Female , Humans , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results
14.
Int J Biol Markers ; 19(4): 257-61, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15646830

ABSTRACT

The study purpose was to investigate the association of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection with prostate cancer. The presence and type of HPV DNA were investigated by polymerase chain reaction in the preservation fluid of 60 consecutive prostate core biopsies (29 benign, 31 malignant). The material was inadequate (no DNA found at beta-globin testing) in four benign and five cancer biopsies. HPV DNA was found in 17 of 26 (65.3%) cancer and 12 of 25 (48.0%) benign biopsies (chi2 = 0.94, p = 0.33). High-risk HPV type positivity was observed in 14 of 26 (53.8%) cancer and in five of 25 (20.0%) benign biopsies (chi2 = 4.38, p = 0.03). Twenty-three of 29 cases were positive at L1 region testing with MY09/11 primers; testing with primers directed to the E6/E7 region revealed six further HPV-positive cases (four cancer, two benign). The presence of HPV in prostate tissue suggests a possible reservoir for sexual transmission of types with oncogenic potential. Our findings also suggest a possible role of high-risk HPV infection in the etiology of prostate cancer and encourage further research into this issue.


Subject(s)
Papillomaviridae/metabolism , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/virology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , DNA Primers/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk
15.
Cytopathology ; 14(5): 263-8, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14510890

ABSTRACT

The study was aimed at assessing interlaboratory reproducibility in the reporting of cervical smears in the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) category. A set of 50 selected slides circulated among 89 laboratories, currently involved in population-based screening programmes for cervical cancer, which provided a diagnostic report according to four main reporting categories based on the 1991 Bethesda system. Interlaboratory agreement was determined according to kappa (K) statistics: overall and weighted K values were determined for each laboratory and for single reporting categories. The results showed a very low reproducibility for the ASCUS category. This finding supports the Bethesda system 1991 recommendation to limit the use of this reporting category and suggests that the clinical response to ASCUS reports should be decided locally, based on the observed positive predictive value for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or more severe lesions.


Subject(s)
Laboratories, Hospital , Precancerous Conditions/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology , Vaginal Smears/classification , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Laboratories , Mass Screening , Observer Variation , Pathology, Clinical/statistics & numerical data , Precancerous Conditions/classification , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/classification , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/classification , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis
16.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 29(1): 4-7, 2003 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12827706

ABSTRACT

The cost-effectiveness of qualifying ASCUS cases into two different subcategories, favoring a reactive (ASCUS-R) or dysplastic process (ASCUS-S), was evaluated at the Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica of Florence in a prospective study. The study determined the positive predictive value (PPV) for histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or more (CIN>) severe lesion of the two ASCUS subgroups. ASCUS-S had a PPV (10.78%) comparable to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) (11.40%). For ASCUS-R cases, the recommendation of 6-mo repeat cytology prompting colposcopy in cases of persistent ASCUS or more severe cytology was also effective, as it selected a subgroup with a relatively high PPV (10.34%). The cost-effectiveness of a protocol based on ASCUS qualification was compared with two other possible options for nonqualified ASCUS cases: immediate colposcopy and colposcopy in persistent ASCUS at 6-mo repeat cytology. The detection rate of CIN2> was substantially higher using ASCUS qualification (35.9 vs 14.8 or 17.1). The cost per ASCUS subject was euro 24.99, 27.11, or 25.14 and that per CIN2> detected was euro 697, 1,831 or 1,470 for the three options, respectively. The evidence that ASCUS detection option implies a higher detection rate of CIN2> and subsequently a lower cost per CIN2> detection must be considered with caution and deserves confirmation by other comparative studies.


Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/economics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/economics , Vaginal Smears/economics , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Colposcopy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
17.
Cytopathology ; 13(2): 92-100, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11952747

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to establish the interlaboratory reproducibility of immunocytochemical analysis of oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) expression and Mib1 growth fraction on fine needle aspiration (FNA) smears. A set of 44 immunostained slides for ER, PR and Mib1 were randomly selected from the archives of the Center for the Study and Prevention of Cancer (CSPO) of Florence, Italy, and submitted for reading to 6 Italian laboratories. The generalized kappa statistic was used as an indicator of agreement among the six laboratories. A good correlation for ER and PR was evident. For Mib1 the results showed some discrepancies. In addition to adequate standardization of procedures, these data confirm that the reliability of the immunocytochemistry is strictly linked to accurate analysis of the results.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Antigens, Nuclear , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Biopsy, Needle , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Division , Female , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Nuclear Proteins/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis , Reproducibility of Results
19.
Br J Cancer ; 83(11): 1462-7, 2000 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11076654

ABSTRACT

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has been suggested for primary screening of cervical cancer. Prediction of future high-grade cervical lesions is crucial for effectiveness and cost. We performed a case control study in a retrospective cohort of women with at least two cervical smears, all but the last one being negative, from the organized cervical screening programme in Florence, Italy. We searched for high-risk HPV in all previous, archival, smears from cases (new histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II or worse) and in one previous smear from each control (last smear cytologically normal, matched by age and interval (latency) from last smear). We applied polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the b-globin gene was used as a DNA preservation marker. High-risk HPV was identified in 71/92 (77.17%) previous smears from 79 cases and 17/332 controls (5.12%). The odds ratio (OR) was 63.76 (95% CI 30.57-132.96). Among cases the proportion of HPV-positive smears declined slightly with increasing latency. Among cases, HPV was found in 81.24% (95% CI 69.93-88.96%) of smears with latency < 4 years and in 67.80% (95% CI 47.72-82.93%) of those taken at longer intervals, up to 6 years. These findings suggest that testing for high-risk HPV allows predicting 80% of CINII/III 3 years before the cytological diagnosis and two thirds 6 years before. They also suggest that testing women negative for high-risk HPV at longer interval and strictly following-up women who are HPV positive could be an effective strategy for cervical cancer screening.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/virology , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Tumor Virus Infections/complications , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Cervix Uteri/cytology , DNA, Viral/analysis , Female , Globins/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tumor Virus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
20.
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed ; 11(7): 685-99, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11011767

ABSTRACT

The biocompatibility of a hemostatic gelatin sponge (Cutanplast Standard) was evaluated in vitro. Cytotoxicity was assessed by neutral red uptake and amido black staining tests; genotoxicity was assayed using the Ames test, Sister Chromatides Exchanges (SCE) and chromosomal aberrations. The ability of the hemostatic gelatin sponge to induce platelet adhesion and release reaction was also determined. The undiluted extract of the test material was found to be cytotoxic, but cell viability was not affected by 1:2 and 1:10 diluted extract. The same extract was found to be non-genotoxic using the three assays for genotoxicity. A significant decrease of platelet number, as well as a significant release of platelet factor 4 was found to be caused by the solid material. In conclusion, Cutanplast Standard is neither cytotoxic nor genotoxic, while inducing platelet adhesion and release reaction when challenged with blood.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Chromosome Aberrations , Gelatin/pharmacology , Hemostatic Techniques , Platelet Factor 4/metabolism , Sister Chromatid Exchange/drug effects , Absorbable Implants , Animals , Biocompatible Materials/toxicity , CHO Cells , Cell Survival/drug effects , Cricetinae , Gelatin/toxicity , Humans , L Cells , Mice , Mutagenicity Tests , Platelet Count , Salmonella typhimurium/drug effects , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...