Outcomes of Abbreviated MRI (Ab-MRI) for Women of any Breast Cancer Risk and Breast Density in a Community Academic Setting.

BACKGROUND: Abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (Ab-MRI) has been evaluated for elevated breast cancer risk or dense breasts but has not been evaluated across all risk profiles. METHODS: Patients selected underwent Ab-MRI from February 2020 to September 2021. Women were older than aged 30 years, up to date with screening mammography, and paid $299 cash. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were identified with a mean age of 52 years; 92.5% were Caucasian, 0% black, and 97.9% were from high socioeconomic status. Mean Gail score was 14.2, and 83.3% had a lifetime risk of breast cancer <20%. Reasons for Ab-MRI: dense breasts (36.6%); family history (24.7%); palpable mass (12.9%). Providers ordering: OBGYN (49.5%); breast surgeon (39.1%); primary care (6.6%). Thirteen biopsies (14%) detected one breast cancer. 31.1% had a change in follow-up screening: 58.6% 6-month MRI, 20.7% 6-month mammogram, and 10.3% 6-month ultrasound. Negative predictive value was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95-100%, p < 0.0001). Sensitivity was 100% (95% CI: 2.5-100%, p < 0.0001), and specificity was 87% (95% CI: 78.3-93.1%, p < 0.0001) compared with 77.6% and 98.8% for mammography. Only one cancer was detected: cost of $27,807 plus cost of 13 MRI or ultrasound (US)-guided biopsies and additional follow-up imaging. Historically 20% of abnormalities detected on full MRI are malignant; however, 7.7% of ab-MRI abnormalities were malignant CONCLUSIONS: One third of women were recommended a change in follow-up, which predominantly included a 6-month MRI. Ab-MRI may introduce average risk women to unnecessary follow-up and increased biopsies with a lower cancer detection rate. Ab-MRI should be evaluated closely before implementation.

The use of neoadjuvant therapy increases the rate of breast conservation in men with locally advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is often diagnosed at a later stage and with a more unfavorable tumor-to-breast ratio compared to women, prompting lower rates of breast conservation (BCT). We sought to assess the practice patterns of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) in MBC patients and the impact on BCT. METHODS: Men with nonmetastatic, invasive breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database. Patients were categorized as having small (cT1/2) or locally advanced (cT3/4) tumors and by whether they received NT (which included endocrine or chemotherapy). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess patterns of NT use and rates BCT. RESULTS: Of 15,151 male patients, 4.8% received NT and 21.6% underwent BCT. NT was more common among males with cT3/4 tumors than those with cT1/2 tumors (8.2 vs. 2.1%, P < .001). Overall, unadjusted rates of BCT were higher for patients receiving NT in the cT3/4 subgroup (19.0 vs. 12.5%, P < .001), a difference which persisted on multivariable analysis. For all patients analyzed, overall survival (OS) did not differ between males who underwent NT and those who did not (110 vs. 122 months, P = .67), but NT was associated with poorer OS in both univariate and multivariate analyses for patients with cT3/4 tumors (both P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Men with invasive breast cancer have an expected low rate of BCT, but NT appears to reduce the use of mastectomy in patients with locally advanced cancers. More work is needed to understand the impacts of BCT on locoregional recurrence and disease-free and overall survival for MBC.

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and mortality in Pennsylvania.

PURPOSE: Many studies have demonstrated disparities in breast cancer (BC) incidence and mortality among Black women. We hypothesized that in Pennsylvania (PA), a large economically diverse state, BC diagnosis and mortality would be similar among races when stratified by a municipality's median income. METHODS: We collected the frequencies of BC diagnosis and mortality for years 2011-2015 from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry and demographics from the 2010 US Census. We analyzed BC diagnoses and mortalities after stratifying by median income, municipality size, and race with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: In this cohort, of 5,353,875 women there were 54,038 BC diagnoses (1.01% diagnosis rate) and 9,828 BC mortalities (0.18% mortality rate). Unadjusted diagnosis rate was highest among white women (1.06%) but Black women had a higher age-adjusted diagnosis rate (1.06%) than white women (1.02%). Race, age and income were all significantly associated with BC diagnosis, but there were no differences in BC diagnosis between white and Black women across all levels of income in the multivariable model. BC mortality was highest in Black women, a difference which persisted when adjusted for age. Black women 35 years and older had a higher mortality rate in all income quartiles. CONCLUSION: We found that in PA, age, race and income are all associated with BC diagnosis and mortality with noteworthy disparities for Black women. Continued surveillance of differences in both breast cancer diagnosis and mortality, and targeted interventions related to education, screening and treatment may help to eliminate these socioeconomic and racial disparities.

Institutions Treating Breast Cancer Patients of a Low Socioeconomic Status Achieve Multidisciplinary Quality Standards at Lower Rates.

BACKGROUND: The National Accreditation Program of Breast Centers (NAPBC) certifies institutions that provide quality breast care. Whereas low socioeconomic status (SES) has a negative impact on patient outcomes, it is unknown whether an institution's patient SES mix is associated with meeting NAPBC standards. METHODS: All institutions submitting at least 100 breast cancer patients to the National Cancer Database (2006-2017) were ranked based on the patients' insurance status, income, and education. The 10% treating the largest proportion of low-SES patients were termed low-SES institutions (LSES). Patient cohorts were created based on the 2018 NAPBC standards. Uni- and multivariate comparisons of patient, tumor, and treatment factors were made to calculate adjusted odds of meeting each standard between low- and non-low-SES institutions. RESULTS: The analysis included 1319 institutions. Both the LSES and non-LSES reached the benchmark rate of 50% lumpectomies (61.2 vs 62.9%; p < 0.001), but the unadjusted and adjusted rates of lumpectomy were lower in LSES. The rate for sentinel lymphadenectomy was lower for LSES (49.2 vs 53.7%; p < 0.001). Similarly, the unadjusted and adjusted rates of adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy were lower at LSES. Although the unadjusted rate of adjuvant radiation was higher at LSES, adjusted odds demonstrated that patients treated at LSES were less likely to undergo adjuvant radiation when appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Small but significant differences in achieving multidisciplinary standards for quality breast cancer care exist between LSES and non-LSES and may exacerbate disparities already faced by patients of low SES.

COVID-19 Pandemic: Changes in Care for a Community Academic Breast Center and Patient Perception of Those Changes.

BACKGROUND: Philadelphia and its suburbs were an epicenter for the initial COVID-19 outbreak. Accordingly, alterations were made in breast cancer care at a community hospital. METHODS: The authors developed a prospective database of all the patients with invasive or in situ breast cancer between March 1 and June 15 at their breast center. Any change in a breast cancer plan due to the pandemic was documented, and the patients were grouped into two cohorts according to whether a change was made (CTX) or no change was made (NC) in their care. The patients were asked a series of questions about their care, including those in the Generalized Anxiety Disorder two-item questionnaire (GAD-2), via telephone. RESULTS: The study enrolled 73 patients: 41 NC patients (56%) and 32 CTX patients (44%). The two cohorts did not differ in terms of age, race, or stage. Changes included delay in therapy (15.1%) and use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET, 28.8%). The median time to surgery was 24 days (interequartile range [IQR], 16-45 days) for the NC patients and 82 day s (IQR, 52-98 days) for the CTX patients (p ≤ 0.001). The median duration of NET was 78 days. The GAD-2 showed anxiety positivity to be 29.6% for the CTX patients and 32.4% for the NC patients (p = 1.00). More than half (55.6%) of the CTX patients believed COVID-19 affected their treatment outlook compared with 25.7% of the NC patients (p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: A prospective database captured changes in breast cancer care at a community academic breast center during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. 44% of patients experienced a change in breast cancer care due to COVID-19. The same level of anxiety and depression was seen in both change in therapy (CTX) and no change (NC). 55.6% of CTX cohort believed COVID-19 affected their treatment outlook.

Comparison of open and minimally invasive approaches to colon cancer resection in compliance with 12 regional lymph node harvest quality measure.

BACKGROUND: There has been a growing trend toward minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for colon cancer. Pathological analysis of a minimum of 12 lymph nodes (LNs) is a benchmark for adequate resection. Here, we present a comparison of surgical techniques in achieving a full oncologic resection. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery for Stage I-III colon cancer (2010-2016) were identified from the National Cancer Database. Cases were stratified by surgical approach. Trends in approach were assessed, including whether the 12-LN benchmark was met. Uni- and multivariate regression was used to assess overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 290,776 colectomies were analyzed. MIS increased from 32.8% to 57.2% from 2010 to 2016 (p < .001). An overall median of 18 LNs were harvested and compliance with the 12-LN benchmark increased (84.6%-91.6%, p < .001); there were no difference between open and MIS. A subset analysis comparing hospital type revealed that regardless of approach, compliance was lower at community hospitals (p < .001). OS was better for patients treated at academic or National Cancer Institute centers, underwent MIS, and in those meeting the 12-LN benchmark (all p ≤ .002). CONCLUSION: As MIS colon resections continue to increase, we demonstrate that there is no difference in the ability to achieve the 12-LN benchmark with open and MIS approaches.

Metabolic Syndrome: does this influence breast cancer outcomes in the triple-negative population?

INTRODUCTION: Metabolic syndrome (MS) is defined by having at least 3 of 4 components: obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension (HTN), and diabetes. Prior studies analyzed the individual components of MS for all breast cancers which are predominantly hormone positive. Our study is the first to evaluate MS in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: A retrospective review of TNBC from 2007 to 2013 identified 177 patients with complete information for statistical analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the association between MS, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 48 (27%) patients had MS. After controlling for age, race, pathologic stage, surgery type, and additional comorbidities outside of MS, MS was significantly associated with poorer DFS (adjusted HR: 2.24, p = 0.030), but not associated with OS (adjusted HR: 1.92, p = 0.103). HTN was significantly associated with poorer DFS (adjusted HR: 3.63, p = 0.006) and OS (adjusted HR: 3.45, p = 0.035) in the univariable and multivariable analyses. Diabetes was not associated with worse OS or DFS. The 5-year age-adjusted OS rates for 60-year-old patients with and without diabetes were 85.8% and 87.3%, respectively. The age-adjusted 5-year OS rate for 60-year old patients was higher in patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 (90.2%) versus BMIs of 25-29.9 (88.2%) or < 25 (83.5%). CONCLUSION: In the TNBC population, MS was significantly associated with poorer DFS, but not associated with OS. HTN was the only component of MS that was significantly associated with both DFS and OS. Obesity has a potential small protective benefit in the TNBC population.

Compliance with Cancer Quality Measures Over Time and Their Association with Survival Outcomes: The Commission on Cancer's Experience with the Quality Measure Requiring at Least 12 Regional Lymph Nodes to be Removed and Analyzed with Colon Cancer Resections.

BACKGROUND: Many quality measures in cancer care are process measures. The rates of compliance for these measures over time have not been well described, and the relationships between measure compliance and survival are not well understood. METHODS: The National Cancer Database, representing cancer registry data from approximately 1500 Commission on Cancer (CoC) cancer programs, was queried to determine the rates of compliance, with the CoC's colon cancer quality measure requiring 12 regional lymph nodes be removed at resection. Data were assessed in 2003, before the measure was reported to programs, through 2015. Measure compliance and risk-adjusted survival were examined by hospital type. RESULTS: From 2003 to 2015, 544,018 cases of colon cancer were analyzed for number of nodes removed. In 2003, compliance was 52.8% and National Cancer Institute (NCI) centers had the highest compliance rate (69.0%), followed by academic cancer centers (61.9%), comprehensive community hospitals (50.9%), and community hospitals (44.0%). Between 2003 and 2015, compliance improved for all hospital types, although differences remained. Risk-adjusted survival in 2009 was better at NCI centers [hazard ratio (HR) 0.76] than at academic cancer centers (HR 0.90), which had better survivals than comprehensive community programs (HR 0.93) when compared with patients treated at community hospitals. CONCLUSION: After introduction of this quality measure, performance at CoC-accredited hospitals improved over the subsequent 13 years, and survival by hospital type paralleled measure compliance by hospital type. This demonstrated measurement may be associated with improvements in performance, and that there are differences in performance and outcome by hospital type.

Rationale for a Minimum Number of Lymph Nodes Removed with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resection: Correlating the Number of Nodes Removed with Survival in 98,970 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of thoracic lymphadenectomy in the treatment of resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to be debated. We hypothesized that the number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed for patients with pathologic node-negative NSCLC would correlate with survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for resected, node-negative, NSCLC patients treated between 2004 and 2014. Patients were grouped according to the number of LNs removed (1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, and ≥17). Patients with <10 LNs removed were also compared with those with ≥10 LNs removed. A Cox regression analysis was performed and hazard ratios (HRs) calculated, with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of 1,089,880 patients with NSCLC reported to the NCDB during the study period, 98,970 (9.0 %) underwent resection without evidence of pathologic nodal involvement. Lobectomy was performed in 83.9 %, sublobar resection was performed in 12.7 % and pneumonectomy was performed in 2.8 % of patients. The number of LNs removed correlated with increasing tumor size and extent of resection. On multivariate analysis, increasing age, male sex, white ethnicity, high tumor grade, larger tumor size, pneumonectomy, and positive surgical margins were all negatively correlated with overall survival. The number of LNs removed and lobectomy/bi-lobectomy correlated with improved survival. The removal of <10 LNs was associated with a 12 % increased risk of death (HR: 1.12, 95 % CI 1.09-1.14; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Survival of early-stage NSCLC patients is associated with the number of LNs removed. The surgical management of early-stage NSCLC should include thoracic lymphadenectomy of at least 10 nodes.

A Phase II Trial Exploring the Success of Cryoablation Therapy in the Treatment of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: Results from ACOSOG (Alliance) Z1072.

BACKGROUND: Cryoablation is a well-established technique to treat fibroadenomas. Pilot studies suggest this could be an effective non-surgical treatment for breast cancer. American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1072 is a phase II trial exploring the effectiveness of cryoablation in the treatment of breast cancers. METHODS: The primary endpoint of Z1072 was the rate of complete tumor ablation, defined as no remaining invasive breast cancer (IBC) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) on pathologic examination of the targeted lesion. A secondary objective was to evaluate the negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine residual IBC or DCIS. Eligible patients included those with unifocal invasive ductal breast cancer ≤2 cm, with <25 % intraductal component and tumor enhancement on MRI. A total of 19 centers contributed 99 patients, of which 86 patients (87 breast cancers) were evaluable for data analysis. RESULTS: Final pathology results, regardless of whether residual IBC/DCIS was in the targeted ablation zone or elsewhere in the breast, showed successful ablation in 66/87 (75.9 %) cancers. The 90 % confidence interval for the estimate of successful cryoablation was 67.1-83.2, with the one-sided lower-sided 90 % CI of 69.0. The negative predictive value of MRI was 81.2 % (90 % CI 71.4-88.8). When multifocal disease outside of the targeted cryoablation zone was not defined as an ablation failure, 80/87 (92 %) of the treated cancers had a successful cryoablation. CONCLUSION: Further studies with modifications on the Z1072 protocol could be considered to evaluate the role for cryoablation as a non-surgical treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy accurately stage melanoma in patients presenting after wide local excision.

BACKGROUND: Patients have traditionally been considered candidates for sentinel node biopsy (SNBx) only at the time of wide local excision (WLE). We hypothesized that patients with prior WLE may also be staged accurately with SNBx. METHODS: Seventy-six patients, including 18 patients from the University of Virginia and 58 from a multicenter study of SNBx led by investigators at the University of Vermont, who had previous WLE for clinically localized melanoma underwent lymphoscintigraphy with SNBx. Median follow-up time was 38 months. RESULTS: Intraoperative identification of at least 1 sentinel node was accomplished in 75 patients (98.6%). The mean number of sentinel nodes removed per patient was 2.0. Eleven patients (15%) had positive sentinel nodes. Among the 64 patients with negative SNBx, 3 (4%) developed nodal recurrences in a sentinel node-negative basin simultaneous with systemic metastasis, and 1 (1%) developed an isolated first recurrence in a lymph node. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study more than doubles the published experience with SNBx after WLE and provides much-needed outcome data on recurrence after SNBx in these patients. These outcomes compare favorably with the reported literature for patients with SNBx at the time of WLE, suggesting that accurate staging of the regional lymph node bed is possible in patients after WLE.

Breast Cancer Cells in the Blood: A Pilot Study.

The goal of this pilot study was to determine in patients with operable breast cancer the incidence of breast cancer cells present in the blood, the clearance rate after surgical resection of the primary tumor, and the incidence of patients with persistent cancer cells in the blood after the primary tumor was removed. Twenty-one patients with operable breast cancer had 15 ml venous blood obtained twice prior to surgery and after surgery at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours and also on days 7 and 14. Immunomagnetic selection of malignant cells was performed on each sample. Cells were then fixed on slides and immunocytochemistry performed on the collected cells. Cells that had a rosette of magnetic beads, cytoplasmic staining for keratin, and malignant morphology were counted as breast cancer cells. Eighteen of 19 of patients had cancer cells detected in at least one of the two blood samples preceding surgical removal of the primary tumor. The incidence of cancer cells in the blood of patients rapidly declined during the 48 hours postsurgery. The incidence of cancer cells in the blood remained stable in approximately 30% of patients to 14 days. The majority of breast cancer patients in this pilot study (even with small tumors and negative nodes) had detectable cancer cells in the blood prior to resection of the primary tumor. These findings justify further investigation. Successful application of this methodology may serve as a powerful indicator of which patients need systemic adjuvant therapy, the effectiveness of systemic adjuvant therapy, tumor recurrence, and early detection of breast cancer.