Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Primatol ; 51(4): 234-245, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35426147

ABSTRACT

In efforts to increase rigor and reproducibility, the USA National Primate Research Centers (NPRCs) have focused on qualification of reagents, cross-laboratory validations, and proficiency testing for methods to detect infectious agents and accompanying immune responses in nonhuman primates. The pathogen detection working group, comprised of laboratory scientists, colony managers, and leaders from the NPRCs, has championed the effort to produce testing that is reliable and consistent across laboratories. Through multi-year efforts with shared proficiency samples, testing percent agreement has increased from as low as 67.1% for SRV testing in 2010 to 92.1% in 2019. The 2019 average agreement for the four basic SPF agents improved to >96% (86.5% BV, 98.9 SIV, 92.1 SRV, and 97.0 STLV). As new pathogens such as SARS coronavirus type 2 emerge, these steps can now be quickly replicated to develop and implement new assays that ensure rigor, reproducibly, and quality for NHP pathogen detection.


Subject(s)
Simian T-lymphotropic virus 1 , Animals , Primates , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms
2.
J Med Primatol ; 49(6): 322-331, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32621339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and the ensuing COVID-19 pandemic prompted the need for a surveillance program to determine the viral status of the California National Primate Research Center non-human primate breeding colony, both for reasons of maintaining colony health and minimizing the risk of interference in COVID-19 and other research studies. METHODS: We collected biological samples from 10% of the rhesus macaque population for systematic testing to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus by RT-PCR and host antibody response by ELISA. Testing required the development and validation of new assays and an algorithm using in laboratory-developed and commercially available reagents and protocols. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: No SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antibody was detected in this study; therefore, we have proposed a modified testing algorithm for sentinel surveillance to monitor for any future transmissions. As additional reagents and controls become available, assay development and validation will continue, leading to the enhanced sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and efficiency of testing.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Macaca mulatta/virology , Monkey Diseases/virology , Pandemics/veterinary , Pneumonia, Viral/veterinary , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Betacoronavirus/immunology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Feces/virology , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2 , Sentinel Surveillance/veterinary
3.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 632(1-3): 33-8, 2010 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20138862

ABSTRACT

[(3)H]cimetidine, a radiolabeled histamine H(2) receptor antagonist, binds with high affinity to an unknown hemoprotein in the brain which is not the histamine H(2) receptor. Improgan, a close chemical congener of cimetidine, is a highly effective pain-relieving drug following CNS administration, yet its mechanism of action remains unknown. To test the hypothesis that the [(3)H]cimetidine-binding site is the improgan antinociceptive target, improgan, cimetidine, and 8 other chemical congeners were studied as potential inhibitors of [(3)H]cimetidine binding in membrane fractions from the rat brain. All compounds produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of [(3)H]cimetidine binding over a 500-fold range of potencies (K(i) values were 14.5 to >8000nM). However, antinociceptive potencies in rats did not significantly correlate with [(3)H]cimetidine-binding affinities (r=0.018, p=0.97, n=10). These results suggest that the [(3)H]cimetidine-binding site is not the analgesic target for improgan-like drugs.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/pharmacology , Brain/metabolism , Cimetidine/analogs & derivatives , Cimetidine/antagonists & inhibitors , Analgesics/chemistry , Animals , Binding Sites , Cimetidine/chemistry , Cimetidine/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Histamine/metabolism , Histamine H2 Antagonists/metabolism , Male , Molecular Structure , Pain/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...