Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 19(4): 323-9, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17726364

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The increase in the proportion of elderly people and a consequent increase in the demand for care have caused healthcare systems to become overloaded. This paper describes the use of Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs), derived from the Minimum Data Set for Home Care, for monitoring quality of care. Research questions were, "Do HCQI scores vary between home care organizations in different countries?" and "Are one or more country-specific sites consistently scoring better on most or all HCQIs"? METHODS: a cross-sectional observational study of 65+ randomly selected clients of home care organizations in urban areas in 11 European countries who had been receiving home care for at least two weeks. Data were collected with the MDS-HC. The scoring of 16 prevalent quality indicators for home care, adjusted for population differences, was calculated with baseline data. RESULTS: Population size at baseline was 4,007 clients. Among home care clients in Europe, "rehabilitation potential in Activities of Daily Living and no therapies" (average 75.9%) and "inadequate pain control" were the most common quality problems. The prevalence between populations studied in various countries varied substantially. No country-specific site consistently scored worst or best. CONCLUSIONS: HCQIs derived from the MDS-HC detect variance in quality scores between home care in the 11 partner countries. The highest prevalence of unwanted outcomes were most often found in the Czech Republic, Italy and Germany. Although further research is necessary, we believe that HCQIs may be of great value for quality improvement in home care.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Czech Republic , Germany , Humans , Italy , Pain Clinics
2.
Can J Public Health ; 97(4): 335-9, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16967757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examined factors associated with the receipt of influenza vaccination among Ontario home care clients. METHODS: Home care clients were assessed, as part of a routine home visit, during a pilot study of the Resident Assessment Instrument - Home Care (RAI-HC) in 12 Ontario Community Care Access Centres (CCACs). The RAI-HC is a multidimensional assessment that identifies clients' needs and level of functional ability. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with influenza immunization in the two years prior to assessment. RESULTS: The overall rate of immunization reached about 80% by 2002. Factors such as age, respiratory problems, diabetes and congestive heart failure were associated with greater uptake, but overall rates of influenza immunization were lower than expected. Low education, smoking and poor medication adherence were negatively associated with influenza immunization. In addition, there was considerable variation in uptake among CCACs after adjusting for other significant individual-level independent variables. INTERPRETATION: Comprehensive assessments like the RAI-HC can be used to help identify and respond to health promotion and disease prevention issues in this population, and to compare rates across Canada.


Subject(s)
Home Care Agencies , Immunization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza, Human/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario
4.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 14(6): 489-97, 2006 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16731717

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine crossnationally the prevalence of indicators of elder abuse and their relationship to putative risk factors, particularly depression, dementia, and lack of service provision. METHOD: Nearly 4,000 people aged 65+ receiving health or social community services in 11 European countries were interviewed using the minimum dataset homecare (MDS-HC) interview, which includes an abuse screen used previously in elder abuse studies and questions about demographic, physical, psychiatric, cognitive, and service factors. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine (4.6%) people assessed had at least one indicator of abuse. The proportion screening positive increased with severity of cognitive impairment, presence of depression, delusions, pressure ulcers, actively resisting care, less informal care, expressed conflict with family or friends, or living in Italy or Germany, but not with having a known psychiatric diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Severity of cognitive impairment, depression, and delusions predicted screening positive for abuse in older adults, but having a known psychiatric diagnosis did not, indicating that screening for psychiatric morbidity might be rational strategies to combat elder abuse. People in Italy and Germany were most likely to screen positive for indicators of abuse, and the authors suggest that this might relate to higher levels of dependency in the participants looked after at home in these countries as a result of cultural and service provision differences.


Subject(s)
Delusions/epidemiology , Dementia/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Elder Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Community Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Czech Republic/epidemiology , Delusions/diagnosis , Dementia/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Elder Abuse/diagnosis , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , France/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Prevalence , Scandinavian and Nordic Countries/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
5.
BMC Geriatr ; 6: 7, 2006 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16584565

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the responsiveness of the Minimum Data Set Activities of Daily Living (MDS-ADL) Scale to change over time by examining the change in physical function in adults with moderate to severe dementia with no comorbid illness who had been resident in a nursing home for over 90 days. METHODS: Longitudinal data were collected on nursing home residents with moderate (n = 7001) or severe (n = 4616) dementia in one US state from the US national Minimum Data Set (MDS). Severity of dementia was determined by the MDS Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS). Physical function was assessed by summing the seven items (bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, eating, toilet use, personal hygiene) on the MDS activities of daily living (ADL) Long Form scale. Mean change over time of MDS-ADL scores were estimated at three and six months for residents with moderate (CPS score of 3) and severe (CPS score of 4 or 5) dementia. RESULTS: Physical function in residents with moderate cognitive impairment deteriorated over six months by an average of 1.78 points on the MDS-ADL Long Form scale, while those with severe cognitive impairment declined by an average of 1.70 points. Approximately one quarter of residents in both groups showed some improvement in physical function over the six month period. Residents with moderate cognitive impairment experienced the greatest deterioration in early-loss and mid-loss ADL items (personal hygiene, dressing, toilet use) and residents with severe cognitive impairment showed the greatest deterioration in activities related to eating, a late loss ADL. CONCLUSION: The MDS-ADL Long Form scale detected clinically meaningful change in physical function in a large cohort of long-stay nursing home residents with moderate to severe dementia, supporting its use as a research tool in future studies.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Dementia/classification , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Nursing Homes , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Long-Term Care , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Severity of Illness Index
6.
BMC Geriatr ; 5: 1, 2005 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15627403

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) as measures of depression among nursing home residents. METHODS: The data for this study were baseline, pre-intervention assessment data from a research study involving nine nursing homes and 704 residents in Massachusetts. Trained research nurses assessed residents using the MDS and the GDS 15-item version. Demographic, psychiatric, and cognitive data were obtained using the MDS. Level of depression was operationalized as: (1) a sum of the MDS Depression items; (2) the MDS Depression Rating Scale; (3) the 15-item GDS; and (4) the five-item GDS. We compared missing data, floor effects, means, internal consistency reliability, scale score correlation, and ability to identify residents with conspicuous depression (chart diagnosis or use of antidepressant) across cognitive impairment strata. RESULTS: The GDS and MDS Depression scales were uncorrelated. Nevertheless, both MDS and GDS measures demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability. The MDS suggested greater depression among those with cognitive impairment, whereas the GDS suggested a more severe depression among those with better cognitive functioning. The GDS was limited by missing data; the DRS by a larger floor effect. The DRS was more strongly correlated with conspicuous depression, but only among those with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The MDS Depression items and GDS identify different elements of depression. This may be due to differences in the manifest symptom content and/or the self-report nature of the GDS versus the observer-rated MDS. Our findings suggest that the GDS and the MDS are not interchangeable measures of depression.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Psychological Tests , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognition Disorders/complications , Depression/complications , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Nursing Homes , Psychometrics
7.
Age Ageing ; 32(3): 343-6, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12720624

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: standardised assessment is recommended in geriatric practice to improve patient care and generate quality data for audit and research. High level indicators used to measure performance of rehabilitation units suggested that more patients were discharged to long-term residential care from one of two hospitals in a Health Authority in South East England. OBJECTIVES: to test whether the information provided by standardised assessment could inform performance indicators used to compare outcomes between hospitals. DESIGN: prospective observational study. SUBJECTS: consecutive patients admitted for rehabilitation to two general geriatric rehabilitation wards in each of two nearby district general hospitals. METHODS: patients were assessed using standard tools (Barthel and Abbreviated Mental Test score) and various scales of the interRAI MDS assessment system (mental and physical functioning, pressure ulcers, continence, falls, mood), within a week of admission and up to one week before discharge. Place of residence prior to admission and discharge destination were determined. RESULTS: on bivariate analysis there was a significant difference in discharge to residential and nursing homes between hospitals. Results from multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an increased risk for institutionalisation at discharge for women [odds ratio 2.42 (95% CI 1.41-4.14)] and patients with impaired cognitive function [odds ratio 1.53 (95% CI 1.28-1.82) for each point increase in MDS cognitive performance scale] and physical function [odds ratio 1.15 (95% CI 1.08-1.22) for each point increase in MDS short ADL scale]. Barthel and Abbreviated Mental Test showed similar odds ratios. Hospital did not remain a significant predictor of discharge destination following adjustment for patients' physical and cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: comparisons of outcomes between hospitals could be misleading unless informed by standardised data on physical and mental functioning of rehabilitation patients.


Subject(s)
Health Services for the Aged/standards , Hospitals/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Activities of Daily Living , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cognition Disorders , Female , Humans , Male
8.
Age Ageing ; 31(1): 58-64, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11850309

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is concern about inappropriate use of psychotropic medication in nursing homes in the UK. Older people with advanced dementia, who might need such medication, are supposed to be admitted to specialist 'Elderly Mentally Infirm' homes. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of dementia and psychotropic medication use in UK non-Elderly Mentally Infirm homes. DESIGN: a) Probability sample of non-elderly mentally infirm places in nursing-homes in South-East England then b) two-stage survey of a probability sample of residents in these places SETTING: Non-Elderly Mentally Infirm nursing homes for older people in SE England. SUBJECTS: Residents registered non-Elderly Mentally Infirm homes. METHODS: Assessment using mini mental state examination for cognitive impairment, the Behave-AD for behavioural problems and the Cornell Scale for depression. Mini mental state examination scores were validated against independent psychiatric assessment in a sub-sample of residents. We gathered medication data from prescription sheets. RESULTS: Of the 445 residents 74% assessed had probable clinical dementia. Of all the residents 38% had severe cognitive impairment, with a three-fold higher rate of behavioural disturbance than others. Psychotropic medication was strongly associated with cognitive impairment. Antipsychotic drugs were prescribed for only 15% of all residents. CONCLUSIONS: If nearly three-quarters of non-Elderly Mentally Infirm nursing home residents have dementia, many with behavioural disturbance, then dementia care is not a 'specialist' area of nursing home care. This study offers no support for the hypothesis that use of antipsychotic drugs in nursing homes is excessive. Questions are raised about policy, staffing and training in nursing homes.


Subject(s)
Dementia/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Homes for the Aged , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Nursing Homes , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Aged , Dementia/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Drug Utilization , England , Female , Frail Elderly , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...