Asthma care during COVID-19: differences in attitudes and expectations between physicians and patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore differences in attitudes, behaviors and expectations related to COVID-19 between physicians and patients with asthma. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed through email and social media to adult patients with asthma during a three-week period in April-May 2020. A separate survey was sent to physicians. The surveys asked about demographic information, specific challenges and concerns due to COVID-19, and attitudes/behaviors during this time. RESULTS: A total of 1171 patients and 225 physicians completed the surveys. Overall, patients with asthma and physicians had large differences in expectations related to COVID-19. Patients were more likely than physicians to believe that individuals with asthma are at a higher risk to get COVID-19 (37.5% vs. 12.0%, p < 0.001), have increased anxiety due to COVID-19 (79.6% vs 70.0%, p = 0.002), and should not go to work (62.7% vs 11.9%, p < 0.001). Neither patients nor physicians felt confident they could distinguish COVID-19 symptoms from asthma (61.2% and 74.5% did not feel confident, respectively). Patients with severe asthma were significantly more impacted by the pandemic (e.g., became unemployed [OR 2.15], had difficulty getting asthma medications [OR 2.37]) compared to those with nonsevere asthma. CONCLUSION: Patients with asthma and their physicians have markedly different attitudes and opinions regarding care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Such differences have important implications when providing patient-centered care.Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at publisher's website.

Breathing exercises in older adults with asthma: a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Breathing exercises have been found to benefit patients with some respiratory disorders, but can take a significant amount of time to complete. The effects of a breathing exercise program are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a short multi-component exercise program for older adults with asthma. METHODS: To be included, subjects were age 65 years or older with persistent asthma. 90 subjects with predominantly moderate to severe asthma were randomized, 45 each, into either the exercise or control groups. After in person training at the initial visit, those in the exercise group performed a short three-part exercise program twice per day at home for one month. Those in the control group performed 2 breaths with the incentive spirometer twice per day. At the initial visit patients completed baseline questionnaires assessing demographic information, asthma control (Asthma Control Test - ACT) and quality of life (mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire - mini-AQLQ) as well as spirometry. After the one-month period at the follow-up visit the ACT, mini-AQLQ, and spirometry were repeated. RESULTS: Subjects in the intervention felt that breathing exercises were helpful, and 87% would recommend them to a friend. Although both groups had improvement in ACT and mini-AQLQ, there were no differences between groups. FEV1 was lower in both groups. CONCLUSION: Although a short breathing exercise program was acceptable for older adults with asthma, it did not produce meaningful improvements in asthma outcomes. A longer program may be necessary.

Asthma Disparities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey of Patients and Physicians.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has demonstrated significantly worse outcomes for minority (black and Hispanic) individuals. Understanding the reasons for COVID-19-related disparities among patients with asthma has important public health implications. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors contributing to health disparities in those with asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: An anonymous survey was sent through social media to adult patients with asthma, and a separate survey was sent to physicians who provide asthma care. The patient survey addressed demographic information including socioeconomic status, asthma control, and attitudes/health behaviors during COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 1171 patients (10.1% minority individuals) and 225 physicians completed the survey. Minority patients were more likely to have been affected by COVID-19 (eg, became unemployed, lived in a community with high COVID-19 cases). They had worse asthma control (increased emergency visits for asthma, lower Asthma Control Test score), were more likely to live in urban areas, and had a lower household income. Initial differences in attitudes and health behaviors disappeared after controlling for baseline demographic features. Institutional racism was demonstrated by findings that minority individuals were less likely to have a primary care physician, had more trouble affording asthma medications due to COVID-19, and were more likely to have lost health insurance because of COVID-19, and that 25% of physicians found it more challenging to care for black individuals with asthma during COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in socioeconomic status and the effects of institutional racism, but not health behaviors, sources of information, or attitudes, are playing a role in disparities seen for patients with asthma during COVID-19.

Sustaining school-based asthma interventions through policy and practice change.

BACKGROUND: Schools are an ideal setting for implementation of asthma interventions for children; however, sustaining school-based programs can be challenging. This study illustrates policy and practice changes brought about through the Childhood Asthma Linkages in Missouri (CALM) program to sustain such programs. METHODS: Researchers analyzed caregiver-reported quantitative data regarding asthma-related outcomes in preintervention and postintervention surveys and qualitative data regarding sustainability efforts in schools reported by CALM grantees. A grounded theory approach was used to identify key concepts and themes that emerged. RESULTS: In 330 children, significant improvements were seen in asthma symptoms, rescue inhaler use, health care utilization, school absenteeism, and activity limitations. Overall, 27 school-based policy and practice changes supporting program sustainability were reported, with policy changes most often concerning the assessment and/or monitoring of children with asthma in the school setting, and practice changes most often regarding institution of regular asthma education programs for students and school personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Sustaining school-based asthma programs is challenging, but can be realized through the participation of diverse partners in enacting policy and practice changes that support the institutionalization of programs into the day-to-day processes of the schools.