Antitumor efficacy of capecitabine and celecoxib in irradiated and lead-shielded, contralateral human BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer xenografts: clinical implications of abscopal effects.

PURPOSE: X-ray therapy (XRT) remains one of the major modalities used to treat patients diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. However, the effect of XRT on metastatic tumors outside the field of irradiation (abscopal effect) remains largely unknown. In the current study, we examined the effect of XRT alone and in combination with capecitabine and/or celecoxib in both irradiated and lead-shielded contralateral BxPC-3 pancreatic cancer xenografts. This chemoradiation regimen was chosen based on our molecular analysis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Athymic mice were injected bilaterally with BxPC-3 cells and treatment was initiated 28 days postimplant. During XRT (2 Gy for 5 consecutive days, administered on days 0 and 24), one flank was irradiated whereas the rest of the body (including the contralateral tumor) was lead shielded. Capecitabine (350 mg/kg) was administered on days 0 to 13 and 24 to 37. Celecoxib was initiated in the diet at 100 ppm (equivalent to 20 mg/kg/d p.o.) and administered throughout the study. RESULTS: In irradiated xenografts, capecitabine and XRT showed synergistic anitiumor efficacy (P=0.008), which was further improved with the addition of celecoxib (P<0.001). In contralateral shielded xenografts, abscopal effects were observed. Whereas monotherapy with XRT showed significant reduction in tumor area in irradiated xenografts, growth was promoted by 23% (P<0.001) in contralateral lead-shielded tumors in the same animals relative to untreated tumors. Interestingly, synergistic antiproliferative efficacy occurred in these contralateral tumors when capecitabine was administered (P<0.001), despite being outside the irradiated field. The addition of celecoxib further inhibited tumor growth (P<0.001). This trimodal combination most effectively stabilized disease in both shielded and irradiated tumors; however, tumor eradication was not observed. There were no significant changes in thymidine phosphorylase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, or cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA levels in irradiated or lead-shielded tumors, suggesting that efficacy cannot be predicted solely from these previously identified indicators of response. Immunohistochemistry examining the proliferation marker Ki-67 showed concordance with tumor response in both irradiated and contralateral shielded xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: These results have implications in the rational design of treatment paradigms for pancreatic cancer where metastatic disease remains the primary cause of patient morbidity and abscopal effects in tumors outside the field of irradiation may affect tumor response.

A phase I study of anti-kinase insert domain-containing receptor antibody, IMC-1C11, in patients with liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Angiogenesis plays an important role in colorectal cancer progression. Stimulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), a transmembrane glycoprotein, results in endothelial mitogenesis. Within this family of receptors, VEGFR 2/kinase-insert-domain-containing receptor (KDR) appear to be principally up-regulated during tumorigenesis. A chimeric anti-KDR antibody, IMC-1C11, blocks VEGFR-KDR interaction and inhibits VEGFR-induced endothelial cell proliferation. This trial seeks to assess the safety, tolerability and feasibility of targeting an important pathway in tumorigenesis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a dose-escalation, single-agent study of IMC-1C11, we enrolled 14 patients with colorectal carcinoma and hepatic metastases. Safety-, pharmacokinetic-, immunogenicity-, and magnetic resonance imaging-assessed alteration of vascular effects of IMC-1C11 were evaluated in this trial. IMC-1C11 was infused weekly at 0.2 mg/kg (n = 3), 0.6 mg/kg (n = 4), 2.0 mg/kg (n = 3), and 4.0 mg/kg (n = 4) for 4 weeks, which constituted a cycle. RESULTS: No grade-3 or -4 IMC-1C11-related toxicities were observed. Minor grade-1 bleeding events were observed in four patients [0.2 mg/kg (n = 1) and 0.6 mg/kg (n = 3)]. Each resolved quickly and required no intervention. The starting dose of IMC-1C11 was selected to achieve a C(max) of approximately 5 micro g/ml. This concentration prevented KDR phosphorylation in vitro. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that the plasma t(1/2) and C(max) were dose dependent with a plasma t(1/2) of 67 +/- 3 h at the 4-mg/kg dose level. Human antichimeric antibodies were detected in 7 of 14 patients. The antibodies to IMC-1C11 inhibited the circulation of the agent in two patients. One patient had prolonged stable disease for seven cycles (28 weeks). The mean changes in tumor-influx volume-transfer constant k(in) (min(-1)) and enhancement factor after 4 weeks of therapy were significantly decreased compared with pretreatment values in 11 patients. CONCLUSION: IMC-1C11 was both safe and well tolerated. Drug levels of IMC-1C11 were reliably predicted. Further clinical investigation of anti-VEGFR/KDR agents is warranted.