Resident Use of EEG Cap System to Rule Out Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus.

BACKGROUND: Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) requires an EEG for diagnosis and in many centers access may be limited. The authors aimed to test whether neurology residents can be trained to use and interpret full-montage EEGs using an EEG cap electrode system to detect NCSE while on-call. METHODS: Neurology residents were trained to interpret EEG recordings using the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society critical care EEG terminology. Residents who achieved a score of 70% or higher in the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society certification test and attended a training session were eligible to use the EEG cap on-call with patients suspected of having NCSE. Residents' experience and interpretation of observed EEG patterns were evaluated using a questionnaire. Each EEG recording was independently reviewed by three epilepsy specialists to determine the interpretability of each study and whether the residents correctly identified the EEG patterns. RESULTS: Sixteen residents undertook the training and 12 (75%) achieved a score of 70% or higher on the certification test. Seven of these residents performed 14 EEG cap studies between August 2017 and May 2018. The percent agreement between residents and electroencephalographers was 78.6% for EEG interpretability and 57.1% for description of EEG pattern. Residents did not miss any malignant patterns concerning for NCSE, which accounted for 1 of 14 EEGs but "overcalled" patterns as malignant in 3 of 14 recordings. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that neurology residents can be taught to perform and interpret EEGs using a cap system to monitor for NCSE. Additional training will help improve EEG interpretation and sensitivity.

Resident training and interrater agreements using the ACNS critical care EEG terminology.

PURPOSE: Electroencephalography (EEG) remains the gold standard for identifying rhythmic and periodic patterns in critically ill patients. Residents have frequent exposures to EEG and critically ill patients during their training. Our study aimed to assess resident competency in the use of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) critical care EEG terminology. METHODS: After self-guided reading and a 2-hour session reviewing the ACNS critical care EEG Terminology training slides, 16 adult neurology residents (PGY 2-4) completed the ACNS certification test. Performance scores were reported as average percent agreement (PA%) with a previously established 5-member expert panel. Interrater agreement was calculated to gauge consensus among peers within the resident cohort. Self-reported comfort levels using the terminology were also obtained. RESULTS: The overall pass rate for our cohort was 50% and the median score was 74%. The terms with the highest PA% were: seizures (86.4%), main term 1 (78%), main term 2 (74%). Interrater agreement scores (kappa values) were almost perfect for seizure, and substantial for main terms 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that with minimal investment, adult neurology residents at various stages of training can effectively learn the ACNS critical care EEG Terminology.