Hearing loss in pediatric temporal bone fractures: Evaluating two radiographic classification systems as prognosticators.

INTRODUCTION: Temporal bone fractures (TBF) are traditionally classified by their angle of fracture relative to the petrous ridge, and more recently by whether or not they violate the otic-capsule. This study compared rates of hearing loss (HL) and signs of otologic dysfunction among fracture types of both classification systems, within the pediatric population. METHODS: Pediatric patients were retrospectively characterized from a previously identified cohort of TBF patients, diagnosed from 2000 to 2014. CT scans were reviewed and TBFs were classified first as longitudinal (L), transverse (T) or mixed (M), and then as otic-capsule sparing (OCS) or otic-capsule violating (OCV). Medical records were reviewed, and rates of HL and presenting signs were compared among L, T and M fractures, and OCS and OCV fractures. RESULTS: Forty-three patients with 47 TBFs met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen, 4 and 25 TBFs were classified as L, T and M fractures, respectively. Thirty-three and 9 were classified as OCS, and OCV, respectively. Among 24 cases of HL: 20, 3, and 1 were conductive HL (CHL), sensorineural HL (SNHL) and mixed HL, respectively. Two cases of SNHL were found among OCV fractures, with none in OCS fractures (estimated difference 0.22; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.60). Similar rates of CHL were found across L, T and M fractures (range 36-50%), and across OCV and OCS fractures (range 42-44%). Hemotympanum was the most common presenting sign, found in 68% of TBFs and 80% of CHL cases. There were no significant differences in the incidence of signs or symptoms between fracture types. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, both the traditional and otic-capsule radiographic classification systems failed to predict the incidence of CHL and other otologic signs in the pediatric population. Though OCV fractures conferred an increased risk for developing SNHL, we found a lower incidence than anticipated given violation to the bony labyrinth.

Pediatric temporal bone fractures: A case series.

OBJECTIVES: Temporal bone fractures are relatively common findings in patients with head trauma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of temporal bone fractures in the pediatric population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. Tertiary care pediatric academic medical center. METHODS: The medical records of patients aged 18 years or less diagnosed with a temporal bone fracture at the Montreal Children's Hospital from January 2000 to August 2014 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, mechanism of injury and complications were analyzed. Imaging studies and audiograms were also evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 323 patients presenting to the emergency department with a skull fracture, 61 presented with a temporal bone fracture. Of these, 5 presented with bilateral fractures. 47 patients had associated fractures, and 3 patients deceased. We observed a male to female ratio of 2.8:1, and the average age was 9.5 years. Motor vehicle accidents were the primary mechanism of injury (53%), followed by falls (21%) and bicycle or skateboard accidents (10%). The most common presenting signs included hemotympanum, decreased or loss of consciousness, facial swelling and nausea and vomiting. 8 patients had otic involvement on computed tomography scans, and 30 patients had documented hearing loss near the time of accident with a majority being conductive hearing loss. 17 patients underwent surgical management of intracranial pressure. CONCLUSION: In children, fractures of the temporal bone were most often caused by motor vehicle accidents and falls. It is common for these patients to have associated fractures.

Appendicitis in adults with incidental midgut malrotation: CT findings.

AIM: To report the computed tomography (CT) findings of acute and complicated appendicitis in adults with incidental midgut malrotation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records and CT studies of eight patients with appendicitis and incidental midgut malrotation who presented to two medical centres between 1998 and 2009 were reviewed. RESULTS: All patients presented with 1-5 days of acute abdominal pain, which was diffuse in two, left-sided in two, lower abdominal in two, and in the right lower quadrant in two patients. The inflamed appendix was right-sided in three, left-sided in three, and in the midline in two patients. Three cases were complicated by a peri-appendicular abscess, and one patient also had a small bowel obstruction. All patients had a complete non-rotation with right-sided duodenum and jejunum, and left-sided colon. All eight patients had an abnormal superior mesenteric artery-superior mesenteric vein (SMA/SMV) relationship and a dysplastic uncinate process of the pancreas. Urgent surgery was performed in six patients and the remaining two were treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: Altered anatomy in malrotation affects the typical clinical and CT findings of acute appendicitis, therefore delaying diagnosis. When CT shows focal inflammation anywhere within the abdomen, along with an abnormal SMA/SMV relationship, the position of the caecum should be ascertained and acute appendicitis ruled out.