Comparisons of PNEC derivation logic flows under example regulatory schemes and implications for ecoTTC.

Derivation of Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNECs) for aquatic systems is the primary deterministic form of hazard extrapolation used in environmental risk assessment. Depending on the data availability, different regulatory jurisdictions apply application factors (AFs) to the most sensitive measured endpoint to derive the PNEC for a chemical. To assess differences in estimated PNEC values, two PNEC determination methodologies were applied to a curated public database using the EnviroTox Platform (www.EnviroToxdatabase.org). PNECs were derived for 3647 compounds using derivation procedures based on example US EPA and a modified European Union chemical registration procedure to allow for comparisons. Ranked probability distributions of PNEC values were developed and 5th percentile values were calculated for the entire dataset and scenarios where full acute or full chronic data sets were available. The lowest PNEC values indicated categorization based on chemical attributes and modes of action would lead to improved extrapolations. Full acute or chronic datasets gave measurably higher 5th percentile PNEC values. Algae were under-represented in available ecotoxicity data but drove PNECs disproportionately. Including algal inhibition studies will be important in understanding chemical hazards. The PNEC derivation logic flows are embedded in the EnviroTox Platform providing transparent and consistent PNEC derivations and PNEC distribution calculations.

SSDs Revisited: Part I-A Framework for Sample Size Guidance on Species Sensitivity Distribution Analysis.

We propose a framework on sample size for species sensitivity distribution (SSD) analyses, with perspectives on Bayesian, frequentist, and even nonparametric approaches to estimation. The intent of a statistical sample size analysis is to ensure that the implementation of a statistical model will satisfy a minimum performance standard when relevant conditions are met. It requires that a statistical model be fully specified and that the means of measuring its performance as a function of sample size be detailed. Defining the model conditions under which sample size is calculated is often the most difficult, and important, aspect of sample size analysis because if the model is not representative, then the sample size analysis will provide incorrect guidance. Definitive guidance on sample size requires general agreement on representative models and their performance from stakeholders in important domains such as chemical safety assessments involving government regulators and industry; the present study provides an initial framework that could be used to this end in the future. In addition, our analysis provides immediate value for understanding how well current SSD analyses perform under a few basic models, sample sizes, and quantitative performance criteria. The results confirm that many analyses are adequately sized to estimate hazardous concentration percentile values (typically the 5th percentile for chemical hazard assessments). However, on the low end of sizes seen in common practice, hazardous concentration estimates can be more than 1 order of magnitude greater than the model-defined value. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1514-1525. © 2019 SETAC.

SSDs revisited: part II-practical considerations in the development and use of application factors applied to species sensitivity distributions.

Application factors are routinely applied in the extrapolation of laboratory aquatic toxicity data to ensure protection from exposure to chemicals in the natural environment. The magnitude of the application factor is both a scientific and a policy decision, but in any case, it should be rooted in scientific knowledge so as to not be arbitrary. Information-rich chemicals are often subjected to species sensitivity distribution (SSD) analysis to transparently describe certain aspects of assessment uncertainty and are normally subjected to much smaller application factors than screening information data sets. We describe a new set of tools useful to assess the quality of SSDs. Twenty-two data sets and 19 chemicals representing agrochemicals, biocides, surfactants, metals, and common wastewater contaminants were compiled to demonstrate how the tools can be used. "Add-one-in" and "leave-one-out" simulations were used to investigate SSD robustness and develop quantitative evidence for the use of application factors. Theoretical new toxicity data were identified for add-one-in simulations based on the expected probabilities necessary to lower the hazardous concentration to 5% of a species (HC5) by a factor of 2, 3, 5, or 10. Simulations demonstrate the basis for application factors in the range of 1 to 5 for well-studied chemicals with high-quality SSDs. Leave-one-out simulations identify the fact that the most influential values in the SSD come from the extremes of the sensitive and tolerant toxicity values. Mesocosm and field data consistently demonstrate that HC5s are conservative, further justifying the use of small application factors for high-quality SSDs. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1526-1541. © 2019 SETAC.

Xenobiotic metabolism gene expression in the EpiDermin vitro 3D human epidermis model compared to human skin.

There is an urgent need to validate in vitro human skin models for use in safety testing. An important component of validation is characterizing the metabolizing capacity of these models. We report comparison of the expression of 139 genes encoding xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in the EpiDerm model and human skin. In microarray analysis, the expression of 87% of the genes was consistent between the EpiDerm model and human skin indicating the presence of similar metabolic pathways suggesting commonality in function. Analysis of EpiDerm models constructed from four donors showed highly comparable expression of xenobiotic metabolizing genes demonstrating reproducibility of the model. Overall, the expression of Phase II enzymes appeared to be more pronounced in human skin and the EpiDerm model than that of Phase I enzymes, consistent with the role of skin in detoxification of xenobiotics. Though the basal expression of CYPs in particular was low in EpiDerm, significant induction of CYP1A1/1B1 activity was observed following treatment with 3-methylcholanthrene. These results indicate that the xenobiotic metabolizing capacity of the EpiDerm model appears to be representative of human skin. Models such as EpiDerm provide a valuable in vitro approach for evaluation of metabolism and toxicity of cutaneous exposures to xenobiotics.

Is the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio) a potential alternative for the fish acute toxicity test?

The fish acute toxicity test is a mandatory component in the base set of data requirements for ecotoxicity testing. The fish acute toxicity test is not compatible with most current animal welfare legislation because mortality is the primary endpoint and it is often hypothesized that fish suffer distress and perhaps pain. Animal alternative considerations have also been incorporated into new European REACH regulations through strong advocacy for the reduction of testing with live animals. One of the most promising alternative approaches to classical acute fish toxicity testing with live fish is the fish embryo toxicity (FET) test. The FET has been a mandatory component in routine whole effluent testing in Germany since 2005 and has already been standardized at the international level. In order to analyze the applicability of the FET also in chemical testing, a comparative re-evaluation of both fish and fish embryo toxicity data was carried out for a total of 143 substances, and statistical approaches were developed to evaluate the correlation between fish and fish embryo toxicity data. Results confirm that fish embryo tests are neither better nor worse than acute fish toxicity tests and provide strong scientific support for the FET as a surrogate for the acute fish toxicity test.

Hepatic gene expression profiling using GeneChips in zebrafish exposed to 17alpha-methyldihydrotestosterone.

Concentration and time-dependent changes in hepatic gene expression were examined in adult, female zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to 0, 0.1, 0.7, 4.9 microg/L of a model androgen, 17alpha-methyldihydrotestosterone (MDHT). At 24 and 168 h, fish were sacrificed and liver was extracted for gene expression analysis using custom Affymetrix GeneChip Zebrafish Genome Microarrays. In an effort to link gene expression changes to higher levels of biological organization, blood was collected for measurement of plasma steroid hormones (17beta-estradiol (E2), testosterone (T)) and vitellogenin (VTG) using ELISA. Body and ovary weight were also measured. A significant reduction in E2 occurred at 24h (0.7 and 4.9 microg/L) and 168 h (4.9 microg/L) following MDHT exposure. In contrast, T was significantly increased at 24h (4.9 microg/L) and 168 h (0.1, 0.7, 4.9 microg/L). 171 and 575 genes were significantly affected in a concentration-dependent manner at either 24 or 168 h by MDHT exposure at p

Hepatic gene expression profiling using Genechips in zebrafish exposed to 17alpha-ethynylestradiol.

Genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic technologies continue to receive increasing interest from environmental toxicologists. This interest is due to the great potential of these technologies to identify detailed modes of action and to provide assistance in the evaluation of a contaminant's risk to aquatic organisms. Our experimental model is the zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposed to reference endocrine disrupting compounds in order to investigate compound-induced changes in gene transcript profiles. Adult, female zebrafish were exposed to 0, 15, 40, and 100ng/L of 17alpha-ethynylestradiol (EE2) and concentration and time-dependent changes in hepatic gene expression were examined using Affymetrix GeneChip Zebrafish Genome Microarrays. At 24, 48, and 168h, fish were sacrificed and liver mRNA was extracted for gene expression analysis (24 and 168h only). In an effort to link gene expression changes to effects on higher levels of biological organization, body and ovary weights were measured and blood was collected for measurement of plasma steroid hormones (17beta-estradiol (E2), testosterone (T)) and vitellogenin (VTG) using ELISA. EE2 exposure significantly affected gene expression, GSI, E2, T, and VTG. We observed 1622 genes that were significantly affected (p< or =0.001) in a concentration-dependent manner by EE2 exposure at either 24 or 168h. Gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed that EE2 exposure affected genes involved in hormone metabolism, vitamin A metabolism, steroid binding, sterol metabolism, and cell growth. Plasma VTG was significantly increased at 24, 48, and 168h (p< or =0.05) at 40 and 100ng/L and at 15ng/L at 168h. E2 and T were significantly reduced following EE2 exposure at 48 and 168h. GSI was decreased in a concentration-dependent manner at 168h. In this study, we identified genes involved in a variety of biological processes that have the potential to be used as markers of exposure to estrogenic substances. Future work will evaluate the use of these genes in zebrafish exposed to weak estrogens to determine if these genes are indicative of exposure to estrogens with varying potencies.

An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 1. Toxicity test methods that have predictive capacity no greater than chance.

An approach commonly used to measure new toxicity test method (NTM) performance in validation studies is to divide toxicity results into positive and negative classifications, and the identify true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) results. After this step is completed, the contingent probability statistics (CPS), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) are calculated. Although these statistics are widely used and often the only statistics used to assess the performance of toxicity test methods, there is little specific guidance in the validation literature on what values for these statistics indicate adequate performance. The purpose of this study was to begin developing data-based answers to this question by characterizing the CPS obtained from an NTM whose data have a completely random association with a reference test method (RTM). Determining the CPS of this worst-case scenario is useful because it provides a lower baseline from which the performance of an NTM can be judged in future validation studies. It also provides an indication of relationships in the CPS that help identify random or near-random relationships in the data. The results from this study of randomly associated tests show that the values obtained for the statistics vary significantly depending on the cut-offs chosen, that high values can be obtained for individual statistics, and that the different measures cannot be considered independently when evaluating the performance of an NTM. When the association between results of an NTM and RTM is random the sum of the complementary pairs of statistics (sensitivity + specificity, NPV + PPV) is approximately 1, and the prevalence (i.e., the proportion of toxic chemicals in the population of chemicals) and PPV are equal. Given that combinations of high sensitivity-low specificity or low specificity-high sensitivity (i.e., the sum of the sensitivity and specificity equal to approximately 1) indicate lack of predictive capacity, an NTM having these performance characteristics should be considered no better for predicting toxicity than by chance alone.

An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 2. Comparison of three measures of toxicity test performance.

An area that requires further research is how best to measure test method performance in validation studies and how to set criteria that should be used to judge the adequacy of this performance. The studies reported here were designed to begin an investigation of these questions. Computer simulations were used to generate data sets similar to those that might be obtained from a large validation study. These data were then analysed using three procedures including determination of the 95% prediction interval (PI), calculation of Pearson's correlation coefficient and calculation of the contingent probability statistics (CPS), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The results of this work suggest that of the three approaches examined, quantitative measurements with calculation of the 95% PI provide the most information to allow discrimination between the performance of several different NTMs. The results also suggest that dividing data sets into positive and negative toxicity classifications followed by the calculation of CPS leads to considerable information loss. This loss of information may be so significant that it is not possible in certain circumstances to distinguish between NTMs that are adequate and those that are not.

An investigation of new toxicity test method performance in validation studies: 3. Sensitivity and specificity are not independent of prevalence or distribution of toxicity.

Often, the only measures of toxicity test performance provided in validation studies are the contingent probability statistics (CPS) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Sensitivity and specificity are generally used in preference to NPV and PPV since NPV and PPV are assumed to vary with changes in prevalence while sensitivity and specificity are assumed to be independent of changes in prevalence. The purpose of the studies reported here was to test whether or not sensitivity and specificity are actually independent of changes in prevalence. Results derived from these studies indicate that sensitivity and specificity vary significantly depending on the prevalence of toxic substances in the set of chemicals being tested. This means sensitivity and specificity should not always be considered constant indicators of toxicity test performance.

Pathology of ocular irritation with bleaching agents in the rabbit low-volume eye test.

Despite differences in the processes leading to tissue damage, the ocular irritation response to various surfactants, two concentrations of an acid and an alkali, and an acetone, alcohol, aromatic amine, and aldehyde has been shown to depend on the extent of initial injury. The purpose of this study was to assess the extent to which this fundamental relationship exists for bleaching agents in the rabbit low-volume eye test. Ten microl of sodium perborate monohydrate (NaBO3), sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 10% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and 15% H2O2 was applied directly to the cornea of the right eye of each rabbit. Macroscopic assessments for irritation were made 3 hours after dosing and periodically until 35 days. Light microscopic examinations were conducted on tissues obtained at 3 hr and on 1, 3, and 35 days. In vivo confocal microscopy (CM) and measurements of dead corneal epithelial cells and keratocytes at 3 hours and 1 day were used to characterize quantitatively initial corneal injury, while in vivo CM performed at 3 hours and 1, 3, 7, 14, and 35 days was used to characterize quantitatively the corneal changes over time. The changes with NaBO3 and NaOCl were consistent with mild irritancy. For both, corneal injury was limited to the epithelium and superficial stroma. The changes with 10% H202 and 15% H2O2 were consistent with severe irritation. Both concentrations affected the epithelium and deep stroma, with 15% H2O2 also at times affecting the endothelium. However, unlike other irritants previously studied, with 10% H2O2 and 15% H2O2 there was an incongruity between the extent of epithelial and stromal injury, with stromal injury being more extensive than epithelial injury. A similar, although less dramatic, effect was observed with NaBO3. Additionally, there was still significant keratocyte loss at 35 days with 10% H2O2 and 15% H2O2 even though the eyes at times were considered to be macroscopically normal. These observations highlight the need to include both epithelial and stromal components in an ex vivo or in vitro alternative assay. In conclusion, these results continue to support and extend our hypothesis that ocular irritation is principally defined by the extent of initial injury despite clear differences in the means by which irritants cause tissue damage. Importantly, we have identified unique differences in the ocular injury and responses occurring with bleaching agents that are important to consider in the development and validation of alternative ocular irritation tests to characterize a broad range of materials differing in type and irritancy.

Pathology of ocular irritation with acetone, cyclohexanol, parafluoroaniline, and formaldehyde in the rabbit low-volume eye test.

The ocular irritation responses to 11 different surfactants and two concentrations of acetic acid and sodium hydroxide have been shown to depend on the extent of initial injury, despite marked differences in the processes leading to tissue damage. The purpose of these studies was to determine the extent to which this fundamental relationship applies to other nonsurfactants. Ten microl of acetone (ACT). cyclohexanol (CY), parafluoroaniline (PF), or 37% formaldehyde (FA) was directly applied to the cornea of the right eye of each rabbit. Eyes and eyelids were macroscopically scored for signs of irritation beginning 3 hours after dosing and periodically until recovery or 35 days. Tissues were obtained for light microscopic examination after 3 hours and on days 1, 3, and 35. Initial corneal injury was characterized quantitatively at 3 hours and I day using in vivo confocal microscopy (CM) and by postmortem quantitation of dead corneal epithelial cells and keratocytes using a Live Dead Assay (L/D, Molecular Probes) and scanning laser CM. Corneal changes over time were characterized quantitatively using in vivo CM performed at 3 hours and 1, 3, 7, 14, and 35 days. The changes with ACT were consistent with mild irritation. Corneal injury was limited to the epithelium and superficial stroma, with the mean normalized depth of injury (NDI) being less than 10% with the majority of regions showing no stromal injury. Changes with CY and PF were consistent with moderate to severe irritation, and FA caused severe irritation. Specifically, corneal injury by CY and PF tended to involve the epithelium and anterior stroma, with the mean NDI being 10.4% to 23.8%, while injury with FA involved the epithelium, deep stroma, and at times the endothelium. Interestingly, with FA significantly less injury was observed at 3 hours with a dramatic increase in injury observed at 1 day and thereafter. In conclusion, these results continue to support and extend our hypothesis that ocular irritation is principally defined by the extent of initial injury despite clear differences in the means by which irritants cause tissue damage. We believe this approach can be applied to developing alternative assays based on injury to ex vivo eyes or injury to an in vitro corneal equivalent system.

Quantitative characterization of acid- and alkali-induced corneal injury in the low-volume eye test.

Defining the extent of initial injury has proven to be a useful basis for differentiating the ocular irritation potential of surfactants; however, the applicability of this method to other types of irritants has not been demonstrated. In the following studies we characterized the extent of corneal injury following exposure to different concentrations of acetic acid and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in the rabbit low-volume eye test. Groups of rabbits received 3% acetic acid, 10% acetic acid, 2% NaOH, or 8% NaOH and were evaluated in vivo by macroscopic and in vivo confocal microscopic examination and postmortem using a live/dead staining kit and scanning laser confocal microscopic examination. Quantitative assessment of macroscopic scores, corneal surface epithelial cell size, corneal epithelial thickness, corneal thickness, depth of stromal injury, corneal light scattering (confocal microscopy through focusing, CMTF), and number of dead cells was conducted at various times, including the following: at 3 hours and at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 35 days. Based on macroscopic scores, the order of ocular irritancy potential was 3% acetic acid < 2% NaOH < 10% acetic acid < 8% NaOH. Evaluation of the quantitative in vivo and postmortem microscopic live/dead data revealed a slight decrease in epithelial thickness and an increase in dead epithelial cell numbers with 3% acetic acid. With 2% NaOH, significant focal changes in epithelial cell size, epithelial thickness, corneal thickness, and number of dead surface epithelial cells occurred at 3 hours and at 1 day, with injury to only a very small number of corneal stromal keratocytes, despite the presence of epithelial denudation. Changes with 10% acetic acid were similar to those noted with 2% NaOH at 3 hours and 1 day, but these changes were more diffuse and included stromal injury to a depth of 7.2 +/- 9.3% of the corneal thickness, with significant numbers of dead keratocytes. Eight percent NaOH, on the other hand, caused focally extensive injury that averaged 26.3 +/- 18.4% of the corneal thickness at 1 day, with significant light scattering from the cornea, which did not return to normal by 35 days postinjury. Overall, these data indicate that ocular irritation as a result of acetic acid and NaOH was associated with changes similar to those observed with surfactants (ie, slight irritants damage the corneal epithelium, mild and moderate irritants damage the corneal epithelium and anterior stromal cells, and severe irritants damage the corneal epithelium and deep stroma). To our knowledge, this is the first time that the ocular irritation potential for different types of materials (acid/alkali, surfactants) has been shown to be primarily dependent on the initial area and depth of injury.

Quantitative measurement of acute corneal injury in rabbits with surfactants of different type and irritancy.

We have hypothesized that differences in ocular irritancy are related to differences in extent of initial injury and that, regardless of the processes leading to tissue damage, extent of injury is the primary factor that determines the final outcome of ocular irritation. In previous in vivo confocal microscopic (CM) studies we identified quantifiable differences in the extent of corneal injury occurring with four surfactants (three anionic, one cationic) known to cause different levels of ocular irritation and demonstrated that extent of initial corneal injury was related to the magnitude of cell death. The purpose of this study was to assess the applicability of this hypothesis to a broad sampling of surfactants. Specifically, initial corneal changes induced by seven different surfactants (one anionic, three cationic, three nonionic) were measured by in vivo CM and cell death was measured by an ex vivo live/dead assay. The right eye of each rabbit was treated by placing 10 microl of a surfactant directly on the cornea. Eyes were examined macroscopically and scored for irritation at 3 h and 1 day. At 3 h and 1 day, in vivo CM was used to examine the corneas and quantitate epithelial cell size, epithelial thickness, corneal thickness, and depth of stromal injury. At 3 h and/or at 1 day, corneas were removed and excised regions were placed in culture media containing 2 microM calcein AM and 4 microM ethidium homodimer. Using laser scanning CM, the number of dead epithelial and/or stromal cells in a 300 x 300 x 170-microm3 (xyz) volume of the cornea was determined. In vivo CM and live/dead assay findings revealed three surfactants to affect only the epithelium, three surfactants to affect the epithelium and superficial stroma, and one surfactant to affect the epithelium and deep stroma. Extent of initial corneal injury reflected level of ocular irritation, and magnitude of cell death was related to the extent of initial corneal injury. These findings are consistent with those for known slight, mild, and moderate to severe irritants, respectively. They suggest that our hypothesis is broadly applicable to surfactants. Additionally, we believe these surfactants should be included as part of a new "gold standard" for use in developing and validating in vitro tests to replace the use of animals in ocular irritancy testing.

Assessment of the Cytosensor Microphysiometer Assay in the COLIPA In Vitro Eye Irritation Validation Study.

The Cytosensor(TM) microphysiometer assay and its associated prediction model were evaluated in the COLIPA ocular irritation validation study for cosmetic ingredients and formulations. Test materials were prepared in low-buffer medium and exposed to L929 cells grown in transwells. The metabolic rate of the cell population was measured after each dose and the dose inducing a 50% decrease in the rate (MRD(50)) was determined and used to predict the ocular irritation potential. Only 29 of the 55 materials could be tested because of solubility limitations. The irritancy potential of many chemical classes was underpredicted by the assay, particularly acids, bases and organics. The use of the assay for surfactants and surfactant-based formulations showed promise, confirming the use of the method for these types of materials, although some revision of the prediction model would be necessary. Excellent interlaboratory reproducibility for the MRD(50) values across all test materials was observed.

The Performance of the Tissue Equivalent Assay using the Skin(2)(TM) ZK1200 Model in the COLIPA International Validation Study on Alternatives to the Draize Eye Irritation Test.

The tissue equivalent assay (TEA) (Osborne et al., 1995) was used to evaluate 55 mixed ingredients and formulations in the COLIPA International Validation Study on Alternatives to the Draize Rabbit Eye Irritation Test (Brantom et al., 1997). The TEA can be used to test all types of materials since it uses a topical application approach and is not limited to only testing liquid or soluble materials. A prediction model (PM) for the test was developed using historical eye irritation data from a total of 132 materials on which in vivo and in vitro data were available. A regression model was derived from these data and used to relate the in vitro endpoint (t(50)) obtained in the study to a Draize MMAS (modified maximum average score). This provided a measure of the predicted in vivo eye irritation scores. In the current study, two separate laboratories used the same protocol to test the same set of coded materials and the results of both laboratories were compared to the initial PM. The TEA met the reliability criteria of the validation study in reproducing the predefined PM in both laboratories, and a good relationship between predicted and observed Draize MMAS values was obtained (r=0.906 and r=0.850). Good correlations were maintained when separate analyses were made of the formulations and ingredients included in the test set. Good relationships between the in vitro endpoint and individual Draize tissue scores (r>0.8) were also exhibited. Although insufficient data were available to make an assessment of interlaboratory variation, some difference in the reproducibility of the assay was noted between the two laboratories, particularly for the highly irritating materials. However, the consistency of data was encouraging and the discrepancies seen between the laboratories suggested a sensitivity of the model to subtle differences in application techniques, and in handling and timing. Taken together, these results indicate the utility of the TEA test for these types of substances and the need to more fully address the issue of interlaboratory reproducibility.

Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury predicts extent of subsequent ocular responses.

PURPOSE: To correlate area and depth of initial corneal injury induced by surfactants of differing type and irritant properties with corneal responses and outcome in the same animals over time by using in vivo confocal microscopy (CM). METHODS: Six groups of six adult rabbits were treated with anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants that caused different levels of ocular irritation. Test materials included slight irritants: 5% sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), polyoxyethylene glycol monoalkyl ether (POE), and 5% 3-isotridecyloxypropyl-bis(polyoxyethylene) ammonium chloride (ITDOP); mild irritants: 5% 3-decyloxypropyl-bis(polyoxyethylene) amine (DOP) and sodium linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS); and a moderate irritant: a proprietary detergent (DTRGT). Ten microliters surfactant were directly applied to the cornea of one eye of each rabbit. Ten untreated rabbits served as control subjects. Area and depth of initial injury was determined by using in vivo CM to measure epithelial thickness, epithelial cell size, corneal thickness, and depth of stromal injury in four corneal regions at 3 hours and at day 1. Area and depth of corneal responses to injury were evaluated at various times from days 3 through 35 by macroscopic grading and quantitative confocal microscopy through-focusing (CMTF). RESULTS: In vivo CM revealed corneal injury with slight irritants to be restricted to the epithelium, whereas the mild and moderate irritants caused complete epithelial cell loss with increasing anterior stromal damage: DOP < LAS < DTRGT. With the slight ocular irritants there was little or no change in corneal thickness or the CMTF intensity profiles. Three hours after treatment, mild and moderate ocular irritants caused a significant increase in corneal thickness, which peaked at day 1 with DOP (483.3+/-80.1 microm) and LAS (572.3+/-60.0 microm) and day 3 with DTRGT (601.4+/-68.7 microm); returning to normal (similar to control values) by day 7 with DOP and day 35 with LAS and DTRGT. The CMTF intensity profiles also showed significant elevation over that in the anterior stroma, which peaked at day 1 with DOP (14,608+/-4,306 U [U is defined as micrometers X pixel intensity]) and day 3 with LAS and DTRGT (18,471+/-6,581 U and 22,424+/-3,704 U, respectively) and returned toward normal by day 7 with DOP and day 14 with LAS and DTRGT. Elevated CMTF profiles principally reflected the presence of hyperreflective, punctate keratocytes and inflammatory cells at days 1 and 3 and the presence of activated keratocytes at day 7. There was a significant correlation between the elevated CMTF intensity profile and the corresponding macroscopic total score in each eye (r = 0.839; P < 0.001). More important, there was a significant correlation between area and depth of initial stromal injury measured at day 1, regardless of ocular irritant and the stromal response measured by the area under the CMTF intensity profile curve in each cornea (r = 0.87; P < 0.0005). A significant correlation between the area and depth of injury and the area under the corneal thickness curve was also observed in each cornea (r = 0.75; P < 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: In individual animals, the extent of initial stromal injury correlated with the magnitude of the corneal responses, measured by the change in corneal thickness and the CMTF depth intensity profile. These findings further support the hypothesis that area and depth of injury are the principal factors determining the early responses and eventual repair processes after accidental eye irritation. They also support the proposed use of area and depth of acute injury as a mechanistic correlate to ocular irritation in the development and validation of potential in vitro ocular irritation tests.

A force plate system for measuring low-magnitude reaction forces in small laboratory animals.

We present a force plate system which measures low-magnitude vertical reaction forces generated by small laboratory animals. The force plate mechanical design minimizes radiated transverse waves, acoustic reverberation, and standing waves caused by impacts on the force plate surface. A secondary force plate and PC-based software algorithm minimize floor vibrational artifact. The force plate was used to measure function of rats during two tests: forelimb/hindlimb hopping reaction and surface righting reaction. In control rats, forelimb hopping rate exceeded hindlimb hopping rate during 16 weeks of repeated testing. Subchronic intraperitoneal (i.p.) dosing of 10 mg/kg/day acrylamide produced a selective impairment of hindlimb hopping. In contrast, single doses of haloperidol (1-5 mg/kg, i.p.) slowed the righting reaction and produced a relatively selective impairment of forelimb hopping. The force plate system presents new opportunities for performing quantitative neurological assessments of small laboratory animals when previously such tests had been performed subjectively and qualitatively.

Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury correlates with cell death.

PURPOSE: In previous studies in which in vivo confocal microscopy (CM) was used, quantifiable differences were identified in the corneal epithelium and stroma for surfactants producing different degrees of ocular irritation. In the present study, in vivo confocal microscopy was used to determine area and depth of the initial corneal changes, and the correlation of the data to cell death was characterized by ex vivo live-dead assay. METHODS: In four groups of rabbits (12 animals each), 10 microl surfactants known to produce slight, mild, moderate, or severe irritation was applied to the central cornea of one eye; 4 untreated rabbits served as controls. Measurements of group total mean epithelial thickness, epithelial cell area, and depth of keratocyte loss in four corneal regions were made by in vivo CM in 6 rabbits of each group and in 4 control animals at 3 hours and in the remaining rabbits at 3 hours and 1 day. Corneas were then removed and fixed for conventional histologic examination (two eyes/treatment/group), or regions were excised and placed in culture media containing 2 microM calcein-acetoxymethyl ester (calcein-AM) and 4 microM ethidium homodimer. Using laser scanning CM, the number of dead epithelial or stromal cells in a 300 x 300 x 170 microm (in the x, y, and z axes, respectively) volume of the cornea was determined. RESULTS: Confocal microscopy showed that application of the slight irritant resulted in decreased epithelial thickness at 3 hours (41.2+/-2.6 microm in treated eyes versus 43.6+/-3 microm in control eyes; n=6 and 4, respectively) and a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in epithelial cell size (630+/-203 microm2 versus 1427.2+/-90.7 microm2). On day 1, mild, moderate, and severe irritants caused complete loss of epithelium and disappearance of keratocytes to a depth of 30.8+/-10.7 microm, 47.2+/-10.4 microm, and 764.6+/-159.6 microm (n=6, 5, and 6), respectively. At 3 hours, live-dead assay detected more dead epithelial cells as a percentage of total surface cells (49.2+/-4.5% in slightly irritated eyes versus 20.9+/-3.2% in control eyes), significantly correlating with the measurement by in vivo CM of average epithelial cell size in each eye (r=-0.96; P < 0.005). On day 1, mild and moderate irritants showed increasing stromal cell death from 9.8+/-16.2 cells to 36.4+/-17.7 cells, which significantly correlated with the depth of stromal injury determined by in vivo CM (r=0.79; P < 0.00001). No surviving keratocytes were detected in severely irritated eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The data support the hypothesis that differences in surfactant-induced ocular irritation are directly related to area and depth of acute corneal injury.