ABSTRACT
Dithiothreitol (DTT), at 1 mmol/L or higher, is widely used as a mucolytic in gastrointestinal research. Previous observations suggest that it may be toxic to the mucosa. DTT effects on the mucosal electrical behavior were assessed. Cumulative concentration-response relationships of DTT effects on rat distal colon mucosa were studied. Isolated mucosa preparations were mounted in an Ussing chamber under short-circuit conditions. The effects of concentrations ranging from 1 mumol/L to 1 mmol/L, applied to either the mucosal or serosal side, were studied. As compared with control, untreated preparations, DTT depressed short-circuit current at 10 mumol/L and higher when applied to the serosal side, and at 50 mumol/L and higher when applied to the mucosal side of the epithelium. On the other hand, transepithelial resistivity showed a progressive increase with DTT applied to either side at a concentration of up to 500 mumol/L, while at the highest concentration (1 mmol/L) a marked decrease in resistivity occurred. Neither the short-circuit current decrease, nor the resistivity collapse showed recovery after repeated rinsing with DTT-free solution. It is concluded that DTT affects epithelial electrical properties at low concentrations, and therefore its use as a mucolytic for electrophysiological studies should be discouraged.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rats , In Vitro Techniques , RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOVT , Colon/drug effects , Dithiothreitol/pharmacology , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Colon/physiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Electrophysiology , Expectorants/pharmacology , Gastrointestinal Agents/pharmacology , Intestinal Mucosa/physiology , Rats, Inbred StrainsABSTRACT
Dithiothreitol (DTT), at 1 mmol/L or higher, is widely used as a mucolytic in gastrointestinal research. Previous observations suggest that it may be toxic to the mucosa. DTT effects on the mucosal electrical behavior were assessed. Cumulative concentration-response relationships of DTT effects on rat distal colon mucosa were studied. Isolated mucosa preparations were mounted in an Ussing chamber under short-circuit conditions. The effects of concentrations ranging from 1 mumol/L to 1 mmol/L, applied to either the mucosal or serosal side, were studied. As compared with control, untreated preparations, DTT depressed short-circuit current at 10 mumol/L and higher when applied to the serosal side, and at 50 mumol/L and higher when applied to the mucosal side of the epithelium. On the other hand, transepithelial resistivity showed a progressive increase with DTT applied to either side at a concentration of up to 500 mumol/L, while at the highest concentration (1 mmol/L) a marked decrease in resistivity occurred. Neither the short-circuit current decrease, nor the resistivity collapse showed recovery after repeated rinsing with DTT-free solution. It is concluded that DTT affects epithelial electrical properties at low concentrations, and therefore its use as a mucolytic for electrophysiological studies should be discouraged.
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rats , Colon , Dithiothreitol , In Vitro Techniques , Intestinal Mucosa , Colon , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Electrophysiology , Expectorants , Gastrointestinal Agents , Intestinal Mucosa , Rats, Inbred StrainsABSTRACT
In normal rat distal colon isolated mucosa, basal short-circuit current (Isc) is mostly due to chloride secretion. Isc is depressed by a brief (5 min) acute hypoxia and overshoots above baseline during reoxygenation. Sodium deprivation raises serum aldosterone levels and leads to expression of functional epithelial sodium channels which are amiloride-sensitive. Thus, in sodium-deprived rats (SDRs) Isc is dependent on electrogenic sodium absorption. Since the ion primarily responsible for the Isc is different in each functional condition, it is not known whether hypoxia and reoxygenation affect SDRs epithelial response in the same way as in normal rats. Therefore the electrical behavior of isolated mucosa preparations from normal and SDRs was studied in an Ussing chamber, and the effect of the epithelial sodium channel blocker, amiloride sensitive, basal Isc than controls. Their response to hypoxia (expressed as a fraction of basal Isc) was similar to controls but upon reoxygenation their recovery was incomplete. SDRs response to hypoxia was not affected by amiloride at any concentration tested. However, post-hypoxic recovery was modified by amiloride in a concentration-dependent way: it was incomplete at 10(-8) M, complete at 10(-6) M, and at 10(-4) M it overshooted above baseline values. Therefore, in sodium-deprived rats, sodium channel blockade reverts the pattern of blunted recovery to the overshooting pattern seen normal rats. These results may be explained by two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses: Epithelial sodium channel blockade in sodium-deprived rats might (1) unmask a basal chloride conductance, and (2) interfere with a negative interaction between sodium chloride conductances.
Subject(s)
Aldosterone/blood , Cell Hypoxia , Colon/physiopathology , Sodium/deficiency , Amiloride/pharmacology , Animals , Colon/drug effects , Diuretics/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Electrophysiology , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Intestinal Mucosa/physiopathology , Male , Rats , Rats, WistarABSTRACT
Dithiothreitol (DTT), at 1 mmol/L or higher, is widely used as a mucolytic in gastrointestinal research. Previous observations suggest that it may be toxic to the mucosa. DTT effects on the mucosal electrical behavior were assessed. Cumulative concentration-response relationships of DTT effects on rat distal colon mucosa were studied. Isolated mucosa preparations were mounted in an Ussing chamber under short-circuit conditions. The effects of concentrations ranging from 1 mumol/L to 1 mmol/L, applied to either the mucosal or serosal side, were studied. As compared with control, untreated preparations, DTT depressed short-circuit current at 10 mumol/L and higher when applied to the serosal side, and at 50 mumol/L and higher when applied to the mucosal side of the epithelium. On the other hand, transepithelial resistivity showed a progressive increase with DTT applied to either side at a concentration of up to 500 mumol/L, while at the highest concentration (1 mmol/L) a marked decrease in resistivity occurred. Neither the short-circuit current decrease, nor the resistivity collapse showed recovery after repeated rinsing with DTT-free solution. It is concluded that DTT affects epithelial electrical properties at low concentrations, and therefore its use as a mucolytic for electrophysiological studies should be discouraged.
Subject(s)
Colon/drug effects , Dithiothreitol/pharmacology , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Animals , Colon/physiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Electrophysiology , Expectorants/pharmacology , Gastrointestinal Agents/pharmacology , In Vitro Techniques , Intestinal Mucosa/physiology , Male , Rats , Rats, Inbred StrainsABSTRACT
In normal rat distal colon isolated mucosa, basal short-circuit current (Isc) is mostly due to chloride secretion. Isc is depressed by a brief (5 min) acute hypoxia and overshoots above baseline during reoxygenation. Sodium deprivation raises serum aldosterone levels and leads to expression of functional epithelial sodium channels which are amiloride-sensitive. Thus, in sodium-deprived rats (SDRs) Isc is dependent on electrogenic sodium absorption. Since the ion primarily responsible for the Isc is different in each functional condition, it is not known whether hypoxia and reoxygenation affect SDRs epithelial response in the same way as in normal rats. Therefore the electrical behavior of isolated mucosa preparations from normal and SDRs was studied in an Ussing chamber, and the effect of the epithelial sodium channel blocker, amiloride sensitive, basal Isc than controls. Their response to hypoxia (expressed as a fraction of basal Isc) was similar to controls but upon reoxygenation their recovery was incomplete. SDRs response to hypoxia was not affected by amiloride at any concentration tested. However, post-hypoxic recovery was modified by amiloride in a concentration-dependent way: it was incomplete at 10(-8) M, complete at 10(-6) M, and at 10(-4) M it overshooted above baseline values. Therefore, in sodium-deprived rats, sodium channel blockade reverts the pattern of blunted recovery to the overshooting pattern seen normal rats. These results may be explained by two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses: Epithelial sodium channel blockade in sodium-deprived rats might (1) unmask a basal chloride conductance, and (2) interfere with a negative interaction between sodium chloride conductances.
ABSTRACT
Dithiothreitol (DTT), at 1 mmol/L or higher, is widely used as a mucolytic in gastrointestinal research. Previous observations suggest that it may be toxic to the mucosa. DTT effects on the mucosal electrical behavior were assessed. Cumulative concentration-response relationships of DTT effects on rat distal colon mucosa were studied. Isolated mucosa preparations were mounted in an Ussing chamber under short-circuit conditions. The effects of concentrations ranging from 1 mumol/L to 1 mmol/L, applied to either the mucosal or serosal side, were studied. As compared with control, untreated preparations, DTT depressed short-circuit current at 10 mumol/L and higher when applied to the serosal side, and at 50 mumol/L and higher when applied to the mucosal side of the epithelium. On the other hand, transepithelial resistivity showed a progressive increase with DTT applied to either side at a concentration of up to 500 mumol/L, while at the highest concentration (1 mmol/L) a marked decrease in resistivity occurred. Neither the short-circuit current decrease, nor the resistivity collapse showed recovery after repeated rinsing with DTT-free solution. It is concluded that DTT affects epithelial electrical properties at low concentrations, and therefore its use as a mucolytic for electrophysiological studies should be discouraged.
ABSTRACT
The contributions of subepithelial tissue, mucosa, and mucus gel layer as restraints for oxygen diffusion in rat distal colon in vitro were assessed by comparing oxygen transfer through preparations of isolated submucosa, isolated mucosa with and without the superficial mucus gel layer, and mucosa-submucosa mounted as flat sheets in a diffusion chamber. One side of the chamber was gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2 while the time course of oxygen concentration rise was measured in the continuously stirred opposite side, initially equilibrated with near-zero oxygen solution. The procedure does not affect epithelial viability. Diffusion in isolated mucosa was the same before and after KCN (5 mM) treatment, suggesting that epithelial oxygen consumption does not influence transfer rates. Subepithelial tissue, mucosa, and mucus gel layer are roughly responsible, respectively, for 12%, 56%, and 32% of oxygen diffusive hindrance. Diffusion coefficients range from 13% (mucosa-submucosa) to 54% (isolated submucosa) of that of water. Subepithelial tissue accounts for about 12% of total diffusive restraint.
Subject(s)
Colon/physiology , Intestinal Mucosa/physiology , Mucus/physiology , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Animals , Culture Techniques , Diffusion , Epithelium/physiology , Male , Rats , Rats, WistarABSTRACT
Short-circuit current (Isc) and transepithelial potential difference (PD) of the rat distal colon mucosa are sensitive to acute hypoxia in vitro. The relative contribution of luminal and serosal oxygenation in sustaining Isc and PD was assessed. Rat distal colon Isc and PD responses to hypoxia and reoxygenation of preparations of mucosa-submucosa, and of isolated mucosa (with and without the mucus gel layer), mounted in an Ussing chamber, and of sacs of everted and non-everted isolated mucosa, were measured. In Ussing chambers, a 5-min total (bilateral) hypoxia reduces Isc and PD by 50 to 70%, while an overshoot was observed on reoxygenation. Serosal hypoxia caused about the same effect as total hypoxia, with complete recovery on reoxygenation. Luminal hypoxia had no effect in either Isc or PD. After total hypoxia, selective serosal reoxygenation allowed complete recovery of Isc and PD; addition of luminal reoxygenation did not further increase Isc and PD. Luminal reoxygenation after total hypoxia did not modify the decrease in Isc and PD, but addition of serosal reoxygenation led to complete recovery. A similar behaviour was seen in isolated mucosa preparations without the mucus gel layer. Baseline Isc and PD of everted sacs were about 45% of those of non-everted sacs, but their response to a hypoxic challenge was slightly attenuated. On reoxygenation, both everted and non-everted sacs showed complete recovery. Summing up: serosal oxygenation is both necessary and sufficient to sustain rat distal colon Isc and PD, while luminal oxygenation is not; there seems to exist a barrier, different from the mucus gel layer, for oxygen access from the luminal side of the epithelium; and distal colon isolated mucosa everted sac preparations are suboptimally oxygenated.