Are we well? A post-pandemic snapshot of dental educator wellness, well-being, and fulfillment.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented changes to oral care and dental education delivery. To date, the vast majority of studies focus on the impact COVID-19 had on the well-being and wellness of patients, practitioners, and students; however, limited literature addresses the pandemic's impact on dental educators. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the wellness, well-being, and fulfillment of dental educators in the years following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval, an anonymous electronic Qualtrics survey was emailed to full-time and adjunct faculty across five (5) dental education institutions in the US. Faculty self-reported on their wellness, general well-being, physical well-being, mental well-being, fulfillment, and work-life balance. Group differences were examined using analysis of variance and the Tukey-Kramer test for multiple comparisons at the p < 0.05 level. RESULTS: The results revealed females and younger dental faculty members reported statistically significantly lower levels of wellness (F2, 123  = 11.16, p < 0.001, F3, 121  = 8.53, p < 0.001), physical (F2, 123  = 11.53, p < 0.001, F3, 121  = 5.54, p = 0.001) and mental well-being (F2, 123  = 12.49, p < 0.001, F3, 121  = 8.63, p < 0.001), fulfillment (F3, 121  = 5.01, p < 0.003), and higher levels of burnout (F2, 123  = 5.53, p = 0.005, F3, 121  = 4.85, p < 0.003). Those who expressed higher levels of burnout also had statistically lower mean well-being scores (F4, 119  = 10.54, p < 0.001). Females also reported a significantly lower work-life balance score compared to male respondents (F2, 121  = 10.37, p < 0.002). CONCLUSION: Despite the social and environmental challenges faced over the last couple of years post-pandemic, dental educators demonstrate a quick ability to adapt, however, disproportional differences in gender and age groups were identified as being significantly correlated to dental educators' self-reports on wellness, well-being, and fulfillment. Insight into these variables can help inform strategies in the academic setting to help support and strengthen the academic workforce.

Prevalencia de infecciones asociadas al donante en receptores de trasplante pulmonar

Resumen La complicación infecciosa es la más frecuente posterior a un trasplante. Existe una limitada descripción respecto a la prevalencia de infecciones asociadas al donante (IAD) en receptores de trasplante de pulmón (TxP). Hay reportes de dicha situación de un 7,6%, con documentación de fracaso profiláctico de 5,6%. Objetivo: estimar la frecuencia de infecciones asociadas al donante tras el TxP y su desenlace en términos de supervivencia global (SG). Materiales y métodos: estudio observacional, descriptivo, llevado a cabo en un centro trasplante de Argentina entre los meses de enero 2018 a junio 2020. Se incluyó a todos los pacientes trasplantados en dicho intervalo, y se contabilizaron a todos aquellos con IAD definida/probada. Resultados: en el periodo antedicho se realizaron 65 TxP en 64 individuos (un caso se realizó trasplante y posterior retrasplante en el mismo periodo de estudio). La mediana de edad fue de 39 (12 - 72) años. La fibrosis quística constituyó el principal motivo de TxP (26,2%). En 61/65 (94%) se aislaron gérmenes de muestras biológicas procedentes del donante: en el líquido de conservación 78,6%, secreciones del donante 73,7%, muestras quirúrgicas 21,3% y en hemocultivos 4,9%. Se identificaron IAD en 2/61 casos (prevalencia de 3,1%; IC 95% 0,4-10,7%), con una mediana de SG postrasplante de 12 meses, y una SG del 98,4% (IC 95% 91,7 - 99,9%). Conclusión: la prevalencia de IAD en receptores de TxP en la presente serie fue del 3,1%, superior a lo documentado en trasplantes de órganos sólidos en general (< 1%), aunque menor a la encontrada en los pocos reportes publicados (7,6%).

Prevalence of Donor-Associated Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients

Abstract The infectious complication is the most common condition after a transplantation. There is a limited description regarding the preva lence of donor-associated infections (DAIs) in lung transplant (LTx) recipients. There are reports of DAIs in LTx recipients of 7.6%, with documented prophylactic failure of 5.6%. Objective: to estimate the frequency of donor-associated infections after lung transplantation and their outcome in terms of overall survival (OS). Methodology: an observational, descriptive study, carried out in a transplant center in Argentina between January 2018 and June 2020. The study included all the patients who underwent a transplantation within such period and those with defined/proven DAIs. Results: during the aforementioned period, 65 LTx were performed in 64 individuals (one patient underwent transplantation and subsequent retransplantation in the same study period). The median age was 39 (12-72) years. Cystic fibrosis was the main reason for transplantation (26.2%) In 61/65 cases (94%), germs were isolated from biological samples collected from the donor: 78.6% in the preservation liquid, 73.7% in donor secretions, 21.3% surgical samples, and 4.9% blood cultures. Donor-associated infections were identified in 2/61 cases (prevalence of 3.1%; 95% CI: 0.4-10.7%), with a median posttransplant OS of 12 months, and an OS of 98.4% (95% CI: 91.7-99.9%). Conclusion: the prevalence of DAIs in LTx recipients in the present series was 3.1%: higher than the figures documented for solid organ transplants in general (< 1%), but lower than the numbers found in the few published reports (7.6%).