Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Robot Surg ; 16(2): 307-314, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33855681

ABSTRACT

To determine whether local anesthetic infiltration and non-narcotic pain medications can safely reduce or eliminate opioid use following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy while maintaining adequate pain control. After initiation of this quality-improvement project, patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy had surgeon-administered local anesthesia around all incisions into each successive layer from peritoneum to skin, with the majority infiltrated into the transversus abdominis muscle plane and posterior rectus sheath of the midline extraction incision. Post-operatively patients received scheduled acetaminophen plus ketorolac, renal function permitting. A retrospective review was performed for all cases over 19 months, spanning project implementation. 157 cases (76 in opioid-free pathway, 81 in standard pathway) were included. Five patients (6.6%) in the opioid-free pathway required post-operative opioids while inpatient, versus 61 (75.3%) in the standard pathway, p < .001. Mean patient-reported pain score on each post-operative day was lower in the opioid-free pathway compared to the standard pathway [day 0: 2.4 (SD 2.6) vs. 3.9 (SD 2.7), p < .001; day 1: 1.4 [SD 1.6] vs. 3.3 (SD 2.2), p < .001; day 2 0.9 (SD 1.5) vs. 2.6 (SD 1.9), p < .001]. Fewer post-operative complications were seen in the opioid-free pathway versus standard [0 vs. 5 (6.2%), p = 0.028], and there was no statistically significant difference in number of emergency room visits or readmissions within 3 weeks of surgery. The use of surgeon-administered local anesthetic plus scheduled non-narcotic analgesics can safely and significantly reduce opioid use after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy while improving pain control.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
3.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 56(6): 670-676, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27667501

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe an innovative hepatitis C virus (HCV) care program and treatment outcomes resulting from pharmacist services. SETTING: Adult ambulatory care HCV clinic within the Miami Veteran Affairs Healthcare System. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Pharmacists with limited prescriptive authority are integrated into a medical hepatology care team. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Pharmacists screen patients with HCV infection for treatment eligibility, counsel patients upon treatment initiation, assess ongoing treatment success and toxicity through patient appointments, telephone calls, and the ordering of pertinent laboratory data, and provide oversight of all patients on HCV therapies. Treatment outcomes are reported to the institutional Antimicrobial Stewardship Program. EVALUATION: Data produced from a continuous quality assurance initiative were utilized. Descriptive statistics were used to present data. RESULTS: From January 2014 through September 2015 there were 1619 pharmacist encounters for 532 unique patients and 597 screenings (including 578 approvals) were completed by a pharmacist. During this time 555 patients were initiated on at least 1 HCV treatment course, with 565 total treatment courses initiated. As new agents became available for use, fluctuation in regimen selection was seen. The most commonly prescribed medications were sofosbuvir (46%), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (37%), and simeprevir (33%). Of the 565 HCV treatment courses initiated, 360 were completed, 29 were stopped early during treatment, and 176 were ongoing. Of the 360 completed courses, 249 had sustained virologic response at week 12 results available, of which 225 (90%) achieved treatment success and 24 (10%) relapsed. Of the 29 courses stopped early, 11 were due to poor medication adherence and 8 were due to adverse drug reaction. CONCLUSION: Through a structured process employing a scope of practice, pharmacists can extend the capacity of medical hepatology providers and provide pharmacotherapy services to enhance care. Information provided here may serve beneficial to others looking to initiate or expand existing HCV pharmacist services.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Pharmaceutical Services/organization & administration , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Female , Florida , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Medication Adherence , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Professional Role , Treatment Outcome , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...