Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurosci ; 36(17): 4895-906, 2016 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27122044

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Dyslexia is the most common developmental language disorder and is marked by deficits in reading and phonological awareness. One theory of dyslexia suggests that the phonological awareness deficit is due to abnormal auditory processing of speech sounds. Variants in DCDC2 and several other neural migration genes are associated with dyslexia and may contribute to auditory processing deficits. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that RNAi suppression of Dcdc2 in rats causes abnormal cortical responses to sound and impaired speech sound discrimination. In the current study, rats were subjected in utero to RNA interference targeting of the gene Dcdc2 or a scrambled sequence. Primary auditory cortex (A1) responses were acquired from 11 rats (5 with Dcdc2 RNAi; DC-) before any behavioral training. A separate group of 8 rats (3 DC-) were trained on a variety of speech sound discrimination tasks, and auditory cortex responses were acquired following training. Dcdc2 RNAi nearly eliminated the ability of rats to identify specific speech sounds from a continuous train of speech sounds but did not impair performance during discrimination of isolated speech sounds. The neural responses to speech sounds in A1 were not degraded as a function of presentation rate before training. These results suggest that A1 is not directly involved in the impaired speech discrimination caused by Dcdc2 RNAi. This result contrasts earlier results using Kiaa0319 RNAi and suggests that different dyslexia genes may cause different deficits in the speech processing circuitry, which may explain differential responses to therapy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although dyslexia is diagnosed through reading difficulty, there is a great deal of variation in the phenotypes of these individuals. The underlying neural and genetic mechanisms causing these differences are still widely debated. In the current study, we demonstrate that suppression of a candidate-dyslexia gene causes deficits on tasks of rapid stimulus processing. These animals also exhibited abnormal neural plasticity after training, which may be a mechanism for why some children with dyslexia do not respond to intervention. These results are in stark contrast to our previous work with a different candidate gene, which caused a different set of deficits. Our results shed some light on possible neural and genetic mechanisms causing heterogeneity in the dyslexic population.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Dyslexia/genetics , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/genetics , Sound , Speech Perception/physiology , Animals , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Auditory Perception , Female , Male , Neuronal Plasticity/genetics , RNA Interference , Rats , Speech Perception/genetics , Speech Perception/radiation effects
2.
Behav Brain Res ; 258: 166-78, 2014 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24344364

ABSTRACT

Previous studies in both humans and animals have documented improved performance following discrimination training. This enhanced performance is often associated with cortical response changes. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that long-term speech training on multiple tasks can improve primary auditory cortex (A1) responses compared to rats trained on a single speech discrimination task or experimentally naïve rats. Specifically, we compared the percent of A1 responding to trained sounds, the responses to both trained and untrained sounds, receptive field properties of A1 neurons, and the neural discrimination of pairs of speech sounds in speech trained and naïve rats. Speech training led to accurate discrimination of consonant and vowel sounds, but did not enhance A1 response strength or the neural discrimination of these sounds. Speech training altered tone responses in rats trained on six speech discrimination tasks but not in rats trained on a single speech discrimination task. Extensive speech training resulted in broader frequency tuning, shorter onset latencies, a decreased driven response to tones, and caused a shift in the frequency map to favor tones in the range where speech sounds are the loudest. Both the number of trained tasks and the number of days of training strongly predict the percent of A1 responding to a low frequency tone. Rats trained on a single speech discrimination task performed less accurately than rats trained on multiple tasks and did not exhibit A1 response changes. Our results indicate that extensive speech training can reorganize the A1 frequency map, which may have downstream consequences on speech sound processing.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiology , Discrimination Learning/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Speech/physiology , Animals , Male , Phonetics , Rats
3.
PLoS One ; 8(10): e78607, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24147140

ABSTRACT

Humans and animals readily generalize previously learned knowledge to new situations. Determining similarity is critical for assigning category membership to a novel stimulus. We tested the hypothesis that category membership is initially encoded by the similarity of the activity pattern evoked by a novel stimulus to the patterns from known categories. We provide behavioral and neurophysiological evidence that activity patterns in primary auditory cortex contain sufficient information to explain behavioral categorization of novel speech sounds by rats. Our results suggest that category membership might be encoded by the similarity of the activity pattern evoked by a novel speech sound to the patterns evoked by known sounds. Categorization based on featureless pattern matching may represent a general neural mechanism for ensuring accurate generalization across sensory and cognitive systems.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Cognition/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Female , Male , Rats , Speech Perception/physiology
4.
Cereb Cortex ; 23(3): 670-83, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22426334

ABSTRACT

Psychophysical, clinical, and imaging evidence suggests that consonant and vowel sounds have distinct neural representations. This study tests the hypothesis that consonant and vowel sounds are represented on different timescales within the same population of neurons by comparing behavioral discrimination with neural discrimination based on activity recorded in rat inferior colliculus and primary auditory cortex. Performance on 9 vowel discrimination tasks was highly correlated with neural discrimination based on spike count and was not correlated when spike timing was preserved. In contrast, performance on 11 consonant discrimination tasks was highly correlated with neural discrimination when spike timing was preserved and not when spike timing was eliminated. These results suggest that in the early stages of auditory processing, spike count encodes vowel sounds and spike timing encodes consonant sounds. These distinct coding strategies likely contribute to the robust nature of speech sound representations and may help explain some aspects of developmental and acquired speech processing disorders.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiology , Auditory Perception/physiology , Brain Mapping , Inferior Colliculi/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Animals , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Female , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
5.
Hear Res ; 289(1-2): 1-12, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22575207

ABSTRACT

Early experience of structured inputs and complex sound features generate lasting changes in tonotopy and receptive field properties of primary auditory cortex (A1). In this study we tested whether these changes are severe enough to alter neural representations and behavioral discrimination of speech. We exposed two groups of rat pups during the critical period of auditory development to pulsed-noise or speech. Both groups of rats were trained to discriminate speech sounds when they were young adults, and anesthetized neural responses were recorded from A1. The representation of speech in A1 and behavioral discrimination of speech remained robust to altered spectral and temporal characteristics of A1 neurons after pulsed-noise exposure. Exposure to passive speech during early development provided no added advantage in speech sound processing. Speech training increased A1 neuronal firing rate for speech stimuli in naïve rats, but did not increase responses in rats that experienced early exposure to pulsed-noise or speech. Our results suggest that speech sound processing is resistant to changes in simple neural response properties caused by manipulating early acoustic environment.


Subject(s)
Auditory Cortex/physiology , Discrimination, Psychological , Speech Acoustics , Speech Perception , Acoustic Stimulation , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Auditory Cortex/growth & development , Auditory Threshold , Conditioning, Operant , Electroencephalography , Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Humans , Noise , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Reaction Time , Time Factors
6.
Nat Neurosci ; 11(5): 603-8, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18425123

ABSTRACT

Neural activity in the cerebral cortex can explain many aspects of sensory perception. Extensive psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of visual motion and vibrotactile processing show that the firing rate of cortical neurons averaged across 50-500 ms is well correlated with discrimination ability. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that primary auditory cortex (A1) neurons use temporal precision on the order of 1-10 ms to represent speech sounds shifted into the rat hearing range. Neural discrimination was highly correlated with behavioral performance on 11 consonant-discrimination tasks when spike timing was preserved and was not correlated when spike timing was eliminated. This result suggests that spike timing contributes to the auditory cortex representation of consonant sounds.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials/physiology , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Auditory Pathways/physiology , Nerve Net/physiology , Neurons/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation/instrumentation , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Animals , Auditory Cortex/anatomy & histology , Auditory Pathways/anatomy & histology , Discrimination Learning/physiology , Female , Language Tests , Nerve Net/anatomy & histology , Phonetics , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Reaction Time/physiology , Time Factors , Time Perception/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL