Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Eur Heart J ; 40(21): 1728-1738, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30226525

ABSTRACT

AIMS: The provision of high-quality education allows the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) to achieve its mission of better cardiovascular practice and provides an essential component of translating new evidence to improve outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 4th ESC Education Conference, held in Sophia Antipolis (December 2016), brought together ESC education leaders, National Directors of Training of 43 ESC countries, and representatives of the ESC Young Community. Integrating national descriptions of education and cardiology training, we discussed innovative pathways to further improve knowledge and skills across different training programmes and health care systems. We developed an ESC roadmap supporting better cardiology training and continued medical education (CME), noting: (i) The ESC provides an excellent framework for unbiased and up-to-date cardiovascular education in close cooperation with its National Societies. (ii) The ESC should support the harmonization of cardiology training, curriculum development, and professional dialogue and mentorship. (iii) ESC congresses are an essential forum to learn and discuss the latest developments in cardiovascular medicine. (iv) The ESC should create a unified, interactive educational platform for cardiology training and continued cardiovascular education combining Webinars, eLearning Courses, Clinical Cases, and other educational programmes, along with ESC Congress content, Practice Guidelines and the next ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. (v) ESC-delivered online education should be integrated into National and regional cardiology training and CME programmes. CONCLUSION: These recommendations support the ESC to deliver excellent and comprehensive cardiovascular education for the next generation of specialists. Teamwork between international, national and local partners is essential to achieve this objective.


Subject(s)
Cardiology , Education, Medical, Continuing/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Cardiology/education , Cardiology/organization & administration , Europe , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic
3.
Europace ; 20(12): 1919-1928, 2018 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29538637

ABSTRACT

Aims: Guideline-adherent treatment is associated with improved prognosis in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients but is insufficiently implemented in clinical practice. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) performed a multinational educational needs assessment study among cardiologists, general practitioners/family physicians (GPs/FPs), and neurologists in order to evaluate knowledge and skills of physicians and system factors related to AF care delivery. Methods and results: A total of 561 physicians (294 cardiologists, 131 neurologists, and 136 GPs/FPs) from six European countries participated. This mixed-methods study included exploratory semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 30) and a quantitative survey that included two clinical cases (n = 531). We identified eight key knowledge gaps and system barriers across all domains of AF care. A majority across all specialties reported skills needing improvement to classify AF pathophysiologically, rather than based on duration of episodes, and reported lack of availability of long-term electrocardiogram recording. Skills interpreting the CHA2DS2-VASc and the HAS-BLED scores were reported as needing improvement by the majority of neurologists (52% and 60%, respectively) and GPs/FPs (65% and 74%). Cardiologists calculated the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores in 94%/70% in a presented case patient, but only 60%/49% of neurologists and 58%/42% of GPs/FPs did. There was much uncertainty on how to deal with anticoagulant therapy in complex patients. There was also a high disparity in using rate or rhythm control strategies, and indications for ablation. Information delivery to patients and communication between different specialties was often considered suboptimal, while national regulations and restrictions often hamper international guideline implementation. Conclusion: We identified major gaps in physicians' knowledge and skills across all domains of AF care, as well as system factors hampering guideline-compliant care implementation and communication. These gaps should be addressed by targeted educational and advocacy efforts.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Cardiologists/education , Education, Medical, Graduate , General Practitioners/education , Guideline Adherence , Health Services Needs and Demand , Needs Assessment , Neurologists/education , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Professional Practice Gaps , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Cardiologists/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Education, Medical, Graduate/standards , Europe , Female , General Practitioners/standards , Guideline Adherence/standards , Health Services Needs and Demand/standards , Healthcare Disparities/standards , Humans , Male , Needs Assessment/standards , Neurologists/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Professional Practice Gaps/standards
4.
Eur Heart J ; 39(15): 1295-1303, 2018 04 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29300869

ABSTRACT

Aims: To assess the knowledge and application of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines in the management of mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods and results: A mixed-methods educational needs assessment was performed. Following a qualitative phase (interviews), an online survey was undertaken using three case scenarios (asymptomatic severe primary MR, symptomatic severe primary MR in the elderly, and severe secondary MR) in 115 primary care physicians (PCPs), and 439 cardiologists or cardiac surgeons from seven European countries. Systematic cardiac auscultation was performed by only 54% of clinicians in asymptomatic patients. Cardiologists appropriately interpreted echocardiographic assessment of mechanism and quantification of primary MR (≥75%), but only 44% recognized secondary MR as severe. In asymptomatic severe primary MR with an indication for surgery, 27% of PCPs did not refer the patient to a cardiologist and medical therapy was overused by 19% of cardiologists. In the elderly patient with severe symptomatic primary MR, 72% of cardiologists considered mitral intervention (transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair in 72%). In severe symptomatic secondary MR, optimization of medical therapy was advised by only 51% of PCPs and 33% of cardiologists, and surgery considered in 30% of cases (transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in 64%). Conclusion: Systematic auscultation is underused by PCPs for the early detection of MR. Medical therapy is overused in primary MR and underused in secondary MR. Indications for interventions are appropriate in most patients with primary MR, but are unexpectedly frequent for secondary MR. These gaps identify important targets for future educational programs.


Subject(s)
Cardiologists/education , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/drug therapy , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Needs Assessment/standards , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Cardiologists/ethics , Cardiologists/organization & administration , Clinical Decision-Making/ethics , Echocardiography/methods , European Union , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Heart Auscultation/standards , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Medical Overuse/statistics & numerical data , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Physicians, Primary Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...