Continuous positive airway pressure is unsafe for radiofrequency ablation of lung cancer under sedation: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of a minimum continuous positive airway pressure of 4 cmH2O (CPAP + 4) during computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for lung malignancies under procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label medical device conducted at a single tertiary university hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Forty-six patients over 18 years of age scheduled for CT-guided RFA of a malignant pulmonary tumour under PSA were randomised to receive either CPAP + 4 or a modified mask for placebo CPAP (Sham-CPAP). Exclusion criteria included contraindications for RFA, refusal to participate, inability to understand the procedure or tolerate the CPAP test, lung biopsy just prior to RFA, intercurrent diseases, or previous randomisation for additional pulmonary RFA. Primary outcomes were the percentage of patients reporting at least one serious adverse event (SAE), classification for complications from the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE), and Clavien-Dindo classifications for complications, hospital stay, and readmissions. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), respiratory parameters, airway management, and the local radiological efficacy of pulmonary ablation. RESULTS: CPAP + 4 prolonged hospital stay (1.5 ± 1.1 vs. 1.0 ± 0 inpatient nights, p = 0.022) and increased the risk of AE post-RFA (odds ratio (95% CI): 4.250 (1.234 to 14.637), p = 0.021 with more pneumothorax cases (n = 5/22, 22.7% vs. n = 0/24, 0%, p = 0.019). Per-protocol analysis revealed more SAEs and CIRSE grade 3 complications in the CPAP + 4 group (23.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.036). No significant differences were found in the effectiveness of oxygenation, ventilation, or pulmonary ablation. CONCLUSION: CPAP is unsafe during CT-guided RFA for lung cancer under PSA even at the lowest pressure setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02117908, Registered 11 April 2014, https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/study/NCT02117908 CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study highlights the hazards of continuous positive airway pressure during radiofrequency ablation of lung cancer, even at minimal pressures, deeming it unsafe under procedural sedation and analgesia in pulmonary interventional procedures. Findings provide crucial insights to prioritise patient safety. KEY POINTS: No prior randomised controlled trials on CPAP safety in percutaneous lung thermo-ablation. Standardised outcome measures are crucial for radiology research. CPAP during lung RFA raises hospital stay and the risk of complications. CPAP is unsafe during CT-guided RFA of lung cancer under procedural sedoanalgesia.

Preoperative localization of lung nodules: a comparative analysis of hookwire and radio-guided procedures.

Background: Histological diagnosis of pulmonary nodules requires surgical resection on many occasions. There are multiple localization strategies each with their own benefits and complications. The objective of this study is to compare preoperative lung nodule localization with hookwire and radiotracer injection (radioguided occult lesion localization, ROLL). To compare results, complications, and volume of the sample resected with both techniques. Methods: Patients undergoing resection of pulmonary nodules with video-assisted thoracoscopy and pre-surgical localization with hookwire or ROLL were studied. Eighty-eight pulmonary nodules were resected in 76 patients: 52 with a hook wire and 36 with a radiotracer. The localization rate, the shortest distance between the nodule and the pleura, the intrapulmonary distance of the locator, the complications, the volume of the resection piece, and the histological result were all assessed. In addition, the factors that influence the volume of the surgical piece were analyzed. Results: All the nodules were resected with both techniques. The intrapulmonary path of the locator is longer for the ROLL group (23.91 vs. 16.28 mm; P=0.04), with no differences in the distance from the nodule to the pleura. The rate of pneumothorax was significantly higher after the placement of a hook wire (69.2% vs. 24.2%; P<0.0001), while there were no differences in the presence of hemorrhage. The volume of the pieces resected using ROLL was more minor than with hookwire, although not statistically significant (20.19 vs. 34.26 cc; P=0.07). Conclusions: Preoperative localization with the ROLL technique is safer than the placement of hookwire. In addition, the ROLL technique shows a tendency to obtain a smaller volume of resected tissue since the marking is not affected by the intrapulmonary route used during marker placement. ROLL technique allows to locate lung nodules with fewer complications than hookwire and probably gets smaller resection samples.

Intraventricular hemorrhage after dural fistula embolization.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dural arteriovenous fistulas are anomalous shunts between dural arterial and venous channels whose nidus is located between the dural leaflets. For those circumstances when invasive treatment is mandatory, endovascular techniques have grown to become the mainstay of practice, choice attributable to their reported safety and effectiveness. We describe the unique and rare case of a dural arteriovenous fistula treated by transarterial embolization and complicated by an intraventricular hemorrhage. We aim to emphasize some central aspects of the perioperative management of these patients in order to help improving the future approach of similar cases. CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old woman with a previously diagnosed Cognard Type IV dural arteriovenous fistula presented for transarterial embolization, performed outside the operating room, under total intravenous anesthesia. The procedure underwent without complications and the intraoperative angiography revealed complete obliteration of the fistula. In the early postoperative period, the patient presented with clinical signs of raised intracranial pressure attributable to a later diagnosed intraventricular hemorrhage, which conditioned placement of a ventricular drain, admission to an intensive care unit, cerebral vasospasm and a prolonged hospital stay. Throughout the perioperative period, there were no changes in the cerebral brain oximetry. The patient was discharged without neurological sequelae. CONCLUSION: Intraventricular hemorrhage may be a serious complication after the endovascular treatment of dural arteriovenous fistula. A close postoperative surveillance and monitoring allow an early diagnosis and treatment which increases the odds for an improved outcome.

[Intraventricular hemorrhage after dural fistula embolization]. / Hemorragia intraventricular após embolização de fístula dural.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dural arteriovenous fistulas are anomalous shunts between dural arterial and venous channels whose nidus is located between the dural leaflets. For those circumstances when invasive treatment is mandatory, endovascular techniques have grown to become the mainstay of practice, choice attributable to their reported safety and effectiveness. We describe the unique and rare case of a dural arteriovenous fistula treated by transarterial embolization and complicated by an intraventricular hemorrhage. We aim to emphasize some central aspects of the perioperative management of these patients in order to help improving the future approach of similar cases. CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old woman with a previously diagnosed Cognard Type IV dural arteriovenous fistula presented for transarterial embolization, performed outside the operating room, under total intravenous anesthesia. The procedure underwent without complications and the intraoperative angiography revealed complete obliteration of the fistula. In the early postoperative period, the patient presented with clinical signs of raised intracranial pressure attributable to a later diagnosed intraventricular hemorrhage, which conditioned placement of a ventricular drain, admission to an intensive care unit, cerebral vasospasm and a prolonged hospital stay. Throughout the perioperative period, there were no changes in the cerebral brain oximetry. The patient was discharged without neurological sequelae. CONCLUSION: Intraventricular hemorrhage may be a serious complication after the endovascular treatment of dural arteriovenous fistula. A close postoperative surveillance and monitoring allow an early diagnosis and treatment which increases the odds for an improved outcome.