ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: After a breast cancer diagnosis, patients are at high risk of reducing their physical activity and gaining weight. Lack of physical activity and weight gain are known negative but modifiable prognostic factors. An observational study of a 3-month adapted physical activity (APA) program was performed to assess its effectiveness in improving physical activity level and reducing risk factors related to health during or after breast cancer treatments. METHOD: Height, weight, and waist circumference (WC) were measured at the beginning and end of the 26-session program. Body mass index (BMI) and WC to height ratio (WHtR) were calculated. Physical activity profile, aerobic capacity, and usual average daily energy expenditure were estimated. Median values were compared using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: Sixty-one (61) voluntary breast cancer patients attended 80% of the sessions. At baseline, median (minimum-maximum) BMI was 23.3 (16.1-36.8) kg.m(-2) and WC and WHtR showed metabolic risks. After 3 months, anthropometric data remained stable. Moderate physical activity significantly improved (+13 min/day) and sedentary tended to decrease (-18 min/day). CONCLUSION: A 3-month APA program allows patients to limit risk factors related to health such as physical inactivity and metabolic risks. This study reinforces the need to promote physical activity as early as possible in cancer patients' care.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological , Breast Neoplasms/physiopathology , Exercise , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Waist CircumferenceABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: After a diagnosis of localised breast cancer, overweight, obesity and weight gain are negatively associated with prognosis. In contrast, maintaining an optimal weight through a balanced diet combined with regular physical activity appears to be effective protective behaviour against comorbidity or mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis. The primary aim of the Programme pour une Alimentation Saine et une Activité Physique Adaptée pour les patientes atteintes d'un cancer du Sein (PASAPAS) randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an intervention of adapted physical activity (APA) for 6 months concomitant with the prescription of a first line of adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary aims include assessing the acceptability of the intervention, compliance to the programme, process implementation, patients' satisfaction, evolution of biological parameters and the medicoeconomic impact of the intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study population consists of 60 women eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy after a diagnosis of localised invasive breast cancer. They will be recruited during a 2-year inclusion period and randomly allocated between an APA intervention arm and a control arm following a 2:1 ratio. All participants should benefit from personalised dietetic counselling and patients allocated to the intervention arm will be offered an APA programme of two to three weekly sessions of Nordic walking and aerobic fitness. During the 6-month intervention and 6-month follow-up, four assessments will be performed including blood draw, anthropometrics and body composition measurements, and questionnaires about physical activity level, diet, lifestyle factors, psychological criteria, satisfaction with the intervention and medical data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the French Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Est IV) and the national agencies for biomedical studies and for privacy. All participants will give written informed consent. The study findings will be disseminated through the scientific public and serve as a foundation for future randomised controlled trials of efficacy.
ABSTRACT
Transferring results of research into clinical practice and their effective use for decisions in health care have become a major concern and are pivotal to quality improvement. Among the tools that have been developed are clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Developing reliable and valid recommendations requires a rigorous methodological approach that combines a systematic review of the results of clinical research with expert, pondered and explicit judgment. Guaranteeing applicability and implementation of these recommendations implies asking the question of how acceptable the recommendations are for the patient, the availability of the procedure and the expertise necessary in the specific context as well as identification of the organizational impact when put into action. CPG are a source of information not only for physicians but also for policy makers, insurance institutions, continued education programs and production of information for high quality decision making for patients.
Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic/standardsABSTRACT
Medical practice has undergone a significant evolution over the last decade due to two important factors: (1) the theory and practice of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) has become widely established; (2) the relationship between health-care professionals and patients or clients has been profoundly modified. In this review, we discuss the heterogeneity and variability of patient preference and the need to develop a doctor-patient relationship, which facilitates shared decision-making in preference to previous models based on patient information without choice and paternalistic attitudes. Thus, this modern concept of care based on EBM shifts the focus of interest from the disease entity itself to that of the patient suffering from a disease. The patient has a right to information concerning his illness; this information helps the patient to participate in medical decisions through the laying out of clinical practice guidelines. These aspects of the patient's role in care management are illustrated by a national program in the field of oncology which empower the patient in the decisions arrived at by a multi-disciplinary oncology team.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Participation , Decision Making , Humans , Informed Consent , Patient Compliance , Patient Satisfaction , Physician-Patient Relations , Practice Guidelines as TopicABSTRACT
In response to the evolution of the information-seeking behaviour of patients and concerns from health professionals regarding cancer patient information, the French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) introduced, in 1998, an information and education program dedicated to patients and relatives, the SOR SAVOIR PATIENT program. Lexonco project is a dictionary on oncology adapted for patients and relatives and validated by medical experts and cancer patients. This paper describes the methodological aspects which take into account patients and experts' perspectives to produce the defi nitions.
Subject(s)
Dictionaries, Medical as Topic , Neoplasms , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Terminology as Topic , Algorithms , France , HumansABSTRACT
In response to the evolution of the information-seeking behaviour of patients and concerns from health professionals regarding cancer patient information, the French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) introduced, in 1998, an information and education program dedicated to patients and relatives, the SOR SAVOIR PATIENT program. The methodology of this program adheres to established quality criteria regarding the elaboration of patient information. Cancer patient information developed in this program is based on clinical practice guidelines produced by the FNCLCC and the twenty French regional cancer centres,the National League against Cancer, The National Cancer Institute, the French Hospital Federation, the National Oncology Federation of Regional and University Hospitals, the French Oncology Federation of General Hospitals, many learned societies, as well as an active participation of patients, former patients and caregivers. The handbook SOR SAVOIR PATIENT Understanding nephroblastoma is an adapted version of various scientific publications and international clinical practice guidelines, validated by oncology experts and by the Nephroblastoma Committee of the French Society against Cancers and Leukaemias in children and adolescents (SFCE). It was elaborated with the active participation of parents and other family members. It is meant to provide a basis for the explanation of the disease, to help parents asking questions, and to facilitate discussions with the healthcare team. It is available from the FNCLCC (101, rue de Tolbiac, 75013 PARIS, Tel. (0033)1 76 64 78 00, www.fnclcc.fr). This document was validated at the end of 2005 and published in May 2006. SOR SAVOIR PATIENT guides are systematically updated when new research becomes available. Information leaflets, extracted from the handbook SOR SAVOIR PATIENT Understanding nephroblastoma and published in this edition of the Cancer et Radiothérapie, describe the physiopathology of nephroblastoma, as well as treatments and follow-up. The guide allows parents and relatives to better understand the disease and the treatments proposed. It also offers health professionals a synthetic evidence-based patient information source which facilitates discussions with the patient.
