[Long-term follow-up of 2 therapeutic programs for the treatment of high-risk childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Experience at the 20 de Noviembre National Medical Center]. / Seguimiento a largo plazo de dos programas terapéuticos para el tratamiento de la leucemia aguda linfoblástica infantil de riesgo alto. Experiencia del Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre.

This paper reports the long-term, disease-free survival of children with high-risk (HR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with two different chemotherapy regimens. HR was defined in children with ALL, younger than 2 or older than 10 years, with or without initial extrahematopoietic disease, with a leukocyte count higher than 25 x 10(9)L, or with L3 FAB type. The first group, LAL1, included 67 patients; they received induction with vincristine (VCR) and prednisone (PDN), early consolidation with 3 cycles of 6-mercaptopurine (6MP), citarabine (ARA) and VCR: central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis (PFX) consisted of both chemotherapy in induction, consolidation and maintenance, radiotherapy (RT) in consolidation. Maintenance was given with 6MP, methotrexate (MTX), VCR adriamycin (ADR), ARA, cyclophosphamide (CFA) and PDN. The second group, LAL2, with 45 patients, received induction with VCR, PDN, CFA, epirrubicin (EPI), L-Asparaginase (L-ASP); early and late consolidation with 6MP, ARA, VCR, carmustine (BCNU), CFA, EPI, MTX and teniposide 8VM26): CNS PFX consisted of both chemotherapy in induction, consolidation and maintenance, RT in consolidation, maintenance with 6MP, MTX, EPI, CFA, ARA VM26 and BCNU. At the time of diagnosis, both groups were comparable. Disease-free survival probability, for LAL1 group was 0.41 at 14 years and for LAL2 group 0.34 at 8 years (p = 0.45). In the LAL1 group there were three failures and 20 relapses, and in the LAL2 group, there were two failures and 22 relapses. CNS relapses were one and seven in LAL1 and LAL2 groups respectively (p = 0.04). In the LAL2, group relapses were more frequent in patients with dose reduction or difered dose due to marrow toxicity (p = 0.02). We believe that the increase in CNS relapse in the LAL2 group was caused by the late administration of CNS PFX. We also believe that although intensive chemotherapy can increase long-term survival, dose adjustments due to marrow toxicity have a negative effect on long-term, relapse-free survival.

[Long-term results of 2 therapeutic protocols in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia of usual risk. Experience at the 20th of November National Medical Center]. / Resultados a largo plazo de dos protocolos terapéuticos, en niños con leucemia linfoblástica aguda de riesgo habitual. Experiencia en el Centro Médico Nacional "20 de Noviembre".

The purpose of this study is to know the disease-free survival in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), submitted to two therapeutic programs. Habitual risk was defined as age older than 2 and younger than 10 years, without neurological, mediastinal or testicular infiltrations, leukocytes < 25 x 10(9)/l and morphologic cell type distinct of L-3. The first group (LAL81) included 30 patients, from 1981 to 1986, and they received: induction with vincristine (VCR) and prednisone (PDN); consolidation with mercaptopurine (MP), cytosine arabinoside (ARA) and doxorubicin (DOX); prophylaxis to the central nervous system (CNS) with radiotherapy and methotrexate (MTX)-ARA-hydrocortisone (HDR) intrathecal, and maintenance with MP and MTX. In the second group (LAL87), 28 patients were included from 1987 to 1993. They received: induction with VCR, PDN and lasparaginase (ASP); consolidation with MP, ARA, DOX, carmustine (BCNU) and cyclophosphamide (CFA); prophylaxis to the (CNS) with intrathecal MTX-ARA-HDR, and maintenance with MP and MTX. There was just one therapeutic failure. In the LAL81, protocol 11 relapses and 9 in LAL87 (p = 0.71) were observed. Of these, two in each group went to the CNS. The disease-free survival in LAL81 was 0.39 at 14 years; in LAL87, was 0.53 at 8 years (p = 0.62).

[Busulfan versus busulfan-interferon as maintenance therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia]. / Busulfán versus busulfán-interterón como terapia de mantenimiento en leucemia mieloide crónica.

We studied 30 patients in order to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of alfa interferon associated with busulfan as maintenance treatment in de novo chronic granulocytic leukemia. Patients received 0.2 mg/kg of busulfan and reached complete hematological remission (CHR). Patients were then randomized in two groups: one to receive busulfan to be administered when the leukocyte count was above 15 x 10(9)/L, and another to receive subcutaneously 5 million IU of alpha-interferon three times per week (plus busulfan if the leukocyte count went above 15 x 10(9)/L). The duration of CHR was longer in the alfa-interferon group: 31 vs 16 months (p = 0.03) but no cytogenetic remissions were observed. Alfa interferon was well tolerated: no patient was excluded from the study due to toxicity.