ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Volumetric imaging research has shown abnormal brain morphology in adults with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) when compared with matched control subjects. In this article, we present brain imaging findings from a study of children with PTSD symptoms. METHODS: Twenty-four children between the ages of 7 and 14 with a history of trauma and PTSD symptoms were assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Children and Adolescents (CAPS-CA). The sample underwent magnetic resonance imaging in a 1.5 T scanner. Brain images were analyzed by raters blind to diagnostic status using well-standardized methods, and images were compared with age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects. RESULTS: The clinical group demonstrated attenuation of frontal lobe asymmetry and smaller total brain and cerebral volumes when compared with the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in hippocampal volume between clinical and control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Frontal lobe abnormalities may occur as a result of PTSD in children or, alternatively, be a risk factor for the development of the syndrome in this age group. The implications of the findings and their consistency with previous research are discussed.
Subject(s)
Brain/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/pathology , Survivors/psychology , Adolescent , Amygdala/pathology , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child Behavior , Child Development , Cognition , Female , Frontal Lobe/pathology , Hippocampus/pathology , Humans , Intelligence , Male , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Wechsler ScalesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess history of trauma and dissociation in a group of juvenile delinquents and to assess how adolescents would respond to a structured interview for dissociative symptoms. METHOD: Sixty-four adolescents in juvenile probation hall participated in 2 investigational sessions in 1996-1997. For session 1 they answered the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), the Response Evaluation Measure for Youth-71 (REMY-71), and the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory. For session 2 they were given the Childhood Trauma Interview (CTI) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D). RESULTS: In this sample 28.3% met criteria for a dissociative disorder and 96.8% endorsed a history of traumatic events. There were significant positive correlations between CTI and CTQ trauma scores and SCID-D and REMY-71 dissociative symptoms. All dissociative symptoms were endorsed, but depersonalization was the most common experience. There was a lack of congruence between the different methods of assessing dissociation. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides support for an early link between history of trauma and dissociation. Adolescents were able to answer questions from a structured interview assessing dissociation.
Subject(s)
Dissociative Disorders/diagnosis , Juvenile Delinquency/psychology , Life Change Events , Prisoners/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Adolescent , Child , Dissociative Disorders/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychologySubject(s)
Naltrexone/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Trichotillomania/drug therapy , Drug Synergism , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Fluoxetine/therapeutic use , Humans , Middle Aged , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/drug therapy , Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/psychology , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Trichotillomania/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a potentially lifesaving procedure, is initiated on hospitalized patients who have an arrest in the absence of a written do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. New York State Law specifies that attending physicians may write a DNR order on an adult patient either with his/her consent or that of a surrogate. Under specified circumstances, concurring physician and witness signatures are also required. This study examines potential obstacles physicians may encounter when implementing a DNR order for a hospitalized patient. METHODS: Sixty house staff officers and 45 attending physicians at two New York City medical centers responded to a questionnaire listing 18 potential problems in obtaining a DNR order. Using a Likert scale, respondents rated the prevalence of each problem. RESULTS: Analysis of the data indicates that attending physician's failure to discuss DNR issues with patients and situations involving surrogate decision making are considered major obstacles to obtaining a DNR order. Procedural regulations, including abundant paperwork and witnessed signatures, are not identified as major obstacles. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a need for improved communication among physicians, patients, and surrogates about advance directives, when feasible, either prior to hospitalization or early in its course, in an effort to comply with DNR legislation in a manner that reflects the patient's wishes and best interests.
