Drug-resistant epilepsy and ketogenic diet therapy - a qualitative study of families' experiences.

BACKGROUND: A diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy is life changing for a family. Ketogenic diet therapy (KDT) can offer hope when other treatments have failed. However, it often requires a significant change in daily routine and dietary habits. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore families' experiences of epilepsy and KDT. METHODS: Parents of a child aged ≤18 years with epilepsy, currently or recently treated with KDT, were recruited from the UK and internationally via UK Ketogenic Diet (KD) centres, charities, and social media. Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised, coded using Nvivo (V12), and inductive thematic analysis undertaken. RESULTS: Twenty-one parents participated. Four themes and 12 subthemes emerged: 1. 'Epilepsy is all consuming' explored the impact of epilepsy on the family. 2. 'KD provides a window to new opportunities' explores the motivators for KDT and positive outcomes. 3. 'The reality of KD' explores day to day life and how families adapt to KD. 4. 'Looking to the future' explores the factors that may make KD easier for families. All were glad their child trialled KD, even when less successful. The importance of a support network including family, friends, charity organisations and the KD team was evident across all themes. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude with five recommendations to help support families in their management of KDT; Improved access to KDT and transition to adult services, access to quality education and support, enhanced variety of KD foods, regular social education and finally consideration of peer mentoring.

Patient and carer perspectives on the use of video consultations in the management of the ketogenic diet for epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant change in the way healthcare was delivered worldwide. During this time, a survey of Ketogenic Dietitians Research Network (KDRN) members found that all respondents expected digital platforms for clinics and/or education to continue post-pandemic. As a follow-up to this, we surveyed views about video consultations (VCs) of patients and carers of those following the ketogenic diet for drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: The SurveymonkeyTM survey was distributed on Matthews' Friends and KDRN social media platforms and emailed from five United Kingdom ketogenic diet centers to their patients/carers. RESULTS: Forty eligible responses were received. More than half of the respondents (23, 57.5%) had attended a VC. Eighteen respondents (45%) would like to have VCs for most (categorized as approximately 75%) or all of their consultations. Half as many (9, 22.5%) would not like video consultations. The most common benefits selected were saving travel time (32, 80%), less stress of finding somewhere to park and not having to take time off work (22, 55% each). Twelve (30%) responded that VCs lessened environmental impact. The most common disadvantages selected were not being able to get blood tests/having to make a separate consultation for blood tests (22, 55% overall), not being able to get weight or height checked/having to make a separate consultation for this and it is less personal/preferring face-to-face (17, 42.5% each). Three-quarters (30 respondents) felt it would be very easy or easy to accurately weigh the patient when not attending an in-person consultation. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that many patients and carers would welcome the option of VCs as well as face-to-face consultations. Where possible and appropriate patients and their families should be offered both options. This is in line with the NHS Long-Term Plan and the NHS response to climate change.

A core outcome set for childhood epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet therapy (CORE-KDT study): International parent and health professional consensus.

OBJECTIVE: Ketogenic diet therapy (KDT) can result in benefits (seizure-related and non-seizure-related) for children with drug-resistant epilepsy. However, clinical trials report a wide range of outcomes, making synthesis of evidence difficult, and do not adequately reflect parent views on important outcomes for their child. To address this, we established the first international parent, health professional, and researcher consensus to develop a core outcome set, guided by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative (COMET registration #1116). METHODS: Ethical approval was granted (London-Surrey REC19/LO/1680). A scoping review and interviews with parents identified a comprehensive list of potentially important outcomes, followed by a two-round online Delphi survey of parents and health professionals to prioritize outcomes of importance for inclusion in a core outcome set. This informed a stakeholder consensus meeting and consultation process to finalize the core outcome set. RESULTS: In total, 97 outcomes were identified; 90 from the scoping review and seven from parent interviews. These were rationalized to 77 by the study advisory group, then rated in the first Delphi round by 49 parents and 96 health professionals, who suggested 12 new outcomes for rating in Round 2. Sixty-six percent of participants (30 parents and 66 professionals) completed Round 2, where 22 outcomes met criteria for inclusion. In the consensus meeting (nine parents and 13 professionals), 27 undecided outcomes were discussed and scored; one further outcome reached consensus for inclusion. After consultation and ratification, 14 outcomes across five domains were included in the core outcome set. SIGNIFICANCE: A core outcome set for childhood epilepsy treated with KDT has been developed, incorporating the views of international parents and professionals. Implementation in research and clinical settings will standardize outcome selection and reporting, facilitate data synthesis, and ultimately enhance the relevance of outcomes to parents, researchers, and health professionals.

The CORE-KDT study: a mixed methods protocol to establish core outcomes for refractory childhood epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet therapy.

BACKGROUND: A core outcome set defines the minimum outcomes that should be included in clinical trials, audit or practice. The aim being to increase the quality and relevance of research by ensuring consistency in the measurement and reporting of outcomes. Core outcome sets have been developed for a variety of disease states and treatments. However, there is no established set of core outcomes for refractory childhood epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet therapy. This should be developed using a patient-centred approach to ensure the outcomes measured are relevant to patients and clinical practice. METHODS: This is a mixed methods study of four phases to develop a core outcome set for refractory childhood epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet therapy. In phase 1, a systematic scoping review of the literature will establish which outcomes are measured in trials of refractory epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet therapy. In phase 2, qualitative interviews with parents and carers will aim to identify the outcomes of importance to these stakeholders. Phase 3 will see a comprehensive list of outcomes collated from the first two phases, grouped into domains according to an outcome taxonomy. Phase 4 will invite parents, health care professionals and researchers to participate in a two-round Delphi study to rate the importance of the presented outcomes. Following which, the core outcome set will be ratified at a face to face consensus meeting. DISCUSSION: This study will guide outcome measurement in future studies of childhood epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet therapy and clinical practice through audit and service evaluation.

Core outcome set development for childhood epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet therapy: Results of a scoping review and parent interviews.

PURPOSE: Clinical trials on childhood epilepsy treated with ketogenic diet (KD) use a wide range of outcomes, however, patients and decision-makers often do not perceive the outcomes used as the most important. We sought parental opinion on outcomes of importance and compared these to outcomes reported in published research. METHODS: Ethical approval (London-Surrey-REC19/LO/1680). A scoping review identified outcomes reported in previous studies of childhood epilepsy and KD. Parents were recruited from nine KD centres (UK), charities and social media (international), then interviewed (Jan-April 2020) to explore priority outcomes. Content analysis identified all outcomes in transcripts. Parent identified outcomes were compared with those in the scoping review. Outcomes were collated and grouped into domains according to the COMET Taxonomy. RESULTS: Of 2663 articles;147 met inclusion criteria. 921 verbatim outcomes were sorted into 90 discrete outcomes, reduced to 70 in consultation with the study advisory group, then classified into 21 domains. Parents (n = 21) identified 39 outcomes as important from the scoping review and seven new outcomes. They prioritised both physiological and functional outcomes in contrast to past studies, which prioritised physiological outcomes. CONCLUSION: Little consistency exists in the outcomes used in childhood epilepsy and KD research. Those traditionally used do not adequately reflect parents' important outcomes for their child. Clinical trials should consider the broader priorities of parents when choosing outcomes, in particular, functional outcomes. Identified outcomes will inform an international two-round Delphi-study with parent, professional and researcher participants to develop a core outcome set for this clinical area (COMET registration #1116).