Patients whom neurologists find difficult to help.

BACKGROUND: All doctors recognise that some patients are more "difficult to help" than others, but the issue has received little systematic investigation in neurological practice. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that patients whose symptoms were less explained by organic disease would be perceived as more difficult to help. METHODS: In a consecutive series of 300 new neurology outpatients, neurologists indicated on four point Likert-type scales how "difficult to help" they found the patient and to what extent the patient's symptoms were explained by organic disease. The patients' demographics, health status, number of somatic symptoms, and mental state were also assessed. RESULTS: The neurologists rated 143 patients (48%) as "not at all difficult" to help, 111 (37%) as "somewhat difficult", 27 (9%) as "very difficult", and 18 (6%) as "extremely difficult". A logistic regression model was constructed and the hypothesis that patients whose symptoms were less explained by organic disease would be perceived as more difficult to help was supported. The only other measured variable that contributed to perceived difficulty was physical disability, but it explained only a small amount of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologists find patients whose symptoms are not explained by organic disease more difficult to help than their other patients.

The outcome of depressive disorders in neurology patients: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In a previous prospective study of 300 consecutive new attenders at neurology outpatient clinics, depressive disorders were diagnosed in 119 patients (40%) and major depressive disorder in 77 (26%). OBJECTIVE: To describe the eight month outcome of depression in this cohort. METHODS: Patients were reinterviewed eight months after their baseline assessment. Mental state was examined using the primary care evaluation of mental disorders (PRIME-MD) interview and the hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) self rating scale. Health status was measured using the medical outcome study 36 item short form scale (SF-36). RESULTS: Of the original cohort of 300, 226 (75%) participated in the follow up. Among them, 88 had a depressive disorder at baseline and 69 (78%) of those were still depressed at follow up; 54 had major depression at baseline and 46 (85%) of those still had a major depressive disorder at follow up. Among the 138 patients who had no depression at baseline, 20 new major depressive disorders had developed by the time of follow up. Resolution of major depressive disorders was associated with an improvement in health status. CONCLUSIONS: Most depressive disorders detected in neurology outpatients persist at an eight month follow up, and a substantial number of new cases arise. Resolution of depressive disorders, particularly major depressive disorder, is associated with an improvement in health status.

The outcome of neurology outpatients with medically unexplained symptoms: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In a previous cross sectional study of 300 consecutive new attenders at neurology outpatient clinics, 90 were detected with symptoms that were rated as "not at all" or only "somewhat" explained by organic disease. OBJECTIVE: To report a follow up study of this cohort. METHODS: Patients were reinterviewed by telephone eight months after their initial assessment. They were asked to rate their overall improvement on a clinical global improvement scale, and their health status on the medical outcome short form 36 item scale (SF-36). The PRIME MD interview was administered to determine psychiatric diagnoses. Neurological and primary care records were reviewed for any changes in diagnostic opinion during the follow up period. RESULTS: Of the 90 eligible patients, 66 (73%) participated in follow up. Among these, five (8%) rated themselves as "much worse," four (6%) as "somewhat worse," 27 (40%) as "just the same," 15 (23%) as "somewhat better," and 15 (23%) as "much better." There were no cases in which an organic cause for the presenting complaint was uncovered during the follow up period. Poorer physical function at baseline was the only predictor of poorer outcome at follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Over half the patients who presented to neurologists with symptoms that were rated as largely or completely medically unexplained had not improved eight months later. In no case was a disease explanation for the original presenting symptoms subsequently identified.

Quantifying the burden of emotional ill-health amongst patients referred to a specialist rheumatology service.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the prevalence of emotional disorders (DSM IV depression, anxiety and panic disorders) amongst patients referred to a rheumatology out-patient service and the proportion of these detected by the rheumatologist. (2) To test the hypotheses that emotional disorders are associated with (i) broad categories of rheumatological diagnosis (systemic, inflammatory vs non-systemic, non-inflammatory), (ii) female gender, (iii) greater symptom burden and disability and (iv) markers of socio-economic deprivation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was made of consecutive newly referred attenders at a hospital-based, regional rheumatology service. Emotional disorders, pain, health status and socio-economic factors were assessed by questionnaire. The letter to the referrer was scrutinized for the rheumatological diagnosis and mention of emotional disorder. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients were eligible and 203 (79%) participated. The sample was 69% female, had a mean age of 50 yr and 68 patients (33.5%) had one or more emotional disorders. Only a minority were detected. There was no association with type of rheumatological diagnosis. Patients with an emotional disorder were more likely to be female (81 vs 62%; P<0.007), to report more pain (mean Visual Analogue Score 70 vs 50 mm, P<0.001), a greater number of somatic symptoms (median 3 vs 1, P<0.001) and greater disability (median Health Assessment Questionnaire 1.1 vs 0.5, P<0.001). Emotional disorders were also associated with some, but not all, measures of lower social and economic status and life dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Emotional disorder is present in one-third of new rheumatology referrals. The course, causation and management of this important component of rheumatological illness merit further attention.

Psychological autopsy studies of suicide: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The psychological autopsy method offers the most direct technique currently available for examining the relationship between particular antecedents and suicide. This systematic review aimed to examine the results of studies of suicide that used a psychological autopsy method. METHOD: A computer aided search of MEDLINE, BIDS ISI and PSYCHLIT, supplemented by reports known to the reviewers and reports identified from the reference lists of other retrieved reports. Two investigators systematically and independently examined all reports. Median proportions were determined and population attributable fractions were calculated, where possible, in cases of suicide and controls. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four reports were identified, of which 76 met the criteria for inclusion; 54 were case series and 22 were case-control studies. The median proportion of cases with mental disorder was 91% (95 % CI 81-98%) in the case series. In the case-control studies the figure was 90% (88-95%) in the cases and 27% (14-48%) in the controls. Co-morbid mental disorder and substance abuse also preceded suicide in more cases (38%, 19-57%) than controls (6%, 0-13%). The population attributable fraction for mental disorder ranged from 47-74% in the seven studies in which it could be calculated. The effects of particular disorders and sociological variables have been insufficiently studied to draw clear conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that mental disorder was the most strongly associated variable of those that have been studied. Further studies should focus on specific disorders and psychosocial factors. Suicide prevention strategies may be most effective if focused on the treatment of mental disorders.

Medically unexplained symptoms in patients referred to a specialist rheumatology service: prevalence and associations.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of medically unexplained rheumatic symptoms amongst patients newly referred to a rheumatology out-patient service and to examine their relationship with pain, disability, socioeconomic factors and the presence of emotional disorders (anxiety, depression and panic). METHODS: A sample of newly referred consecutive patients to a hospital-based, regional rheumatology service was administered a questionnaire for assessment of emotional disorders, pain, health status and socioeconomic factors. Rheumatologists rated the degree to which patients' symptoms were explained by organic disease (organicity rating). RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-six patients were eligible and 203 (79%) participated. The sample included 69% females and mean age was 50 yr. Ninety-three (46%) had symptoms that were completely explained, 52 (26%) largely explained, 41 (20%) somewhat explained and 17 (8%) not at all explained by organic disease. Patients whose symptoms were of "low organicity" (somewhat or not at all explained) were more likely to be female [relative risk (RR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-3.1], younger (mean age 44 vs 52 yr, P<0.001) and to report more somatic symptoms (median 2 vs 1, P=0.021). On univariate analysis they were more likely to be experiencing financial hardship (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6) and work dissatisfaction (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4) and to live in rented housing (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.8) or with dependent relatives (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.5). Logistic regression showed that female gender and living in rented housing were the significant independent predictors of low organicity. Organicity ratings were not associated with pain severity, disability, physical and mental health status or the presence of emotional disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-nine per cent of patients newly referred to rheumatology clinics had symptoms that were poorly explained by identifiable rheumatic disease. Having unexplained symptoms was associated with socioeconomic factors but not levels of pain, disability or emotional disorders.

Mental health in medical students. A case control study using the 60 item General Health Questionnaire.

This paper describes a cross-sectional case control study to measure the prevalence of psychological morbidity in first year medical students and compare it to the prevalence in in a randomly selected control group of other first year students at Edinburgh University. The study was conducted anonymously using the 60 item General Health Questionnaire. Participation rates were over 90% in both subjects and controls. A total of 17% of medical students had symptoms of psychological morbidity which may benefit from treatment and a further 29% of medical students had symptoms of psychological distress which would be expected to remit spontaneously. A similar rate was found in the control group of students. This suggests that if medical students or doctors, later in their careers, fare badly in terms of mental health then this may well be related to aspects of their lives and is not an intrinsic characteristic.

Depression after stroke and lesion location: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence on the hypothesis that the risk of depression after stroke is influenced by the location of the brain lesion. We undertook a systematic review to examine the hypotheses that depression is more commonly associated with left-hemisphere strokes than with right-hemisphere strokes and with lesions of the left anterior brain than with other regions. METHODS: We did a computer-aided search of MEDLINE, BIDS ISI, and PsychLit databases supplemented by hand searches of key journals. We included all reports on the association of depression after stroke with the location of the brain lesion. Studies were systematically and independently examined by two investigators. Fixed-effects and random-effects meta-analyses were done. FINDINGS: 143 reports were identified by the search strategy. 48 were eligible for inclusion. Not all reports included original data. Only two reports of original data supported the hypotheses and seven clearly did not. The pooled (random-effects) relative risk of depression after a left-hemisphere stroke, compared with a right-hemisphere stroke, was 0.95 (95% CI 0.83-1.10). For depression after a left anterior lesion compared with all other brain areas the pooled (random-effects) relative risk was 1-17 (0.87-1.62). Restriction of the analyses to reports from high-quality studies or major depressive disorder did not substantially affect the findings. Nor were they affected by stratification of the time between stroke and the assessment of depression. Multiple publications from the same samples of patients were apparent. INTERPRETATION: This systematic review offered no support for the hypothesis that the risk of depression after stroke is affected by the location of the brain lesion.

Neurological disease, emotional disorder, and disability: they are related: a study of 300 consecutive new referrals to a neurology outpatient department.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in patients referred to general neurology outpatient clinics, to compare disability and number of somatic symptoms in patients with and without emotional disorder, the relation to neurological disease, and assess the need for psychiatric treatment as perceived by patients and doctors. METHODS: A prospective cohort study set in a regional neurology service in Edinburgh, Scotland. The subjects were 300 newly referred consecutive outpatients who were assessed for DSM IV anxiety and depressive disorders (PRIME-MD, and HAD), health status, and disability (SF-36), and patients', GPs' and neurologists' ratings of the need for patient to receive psychiatric or psychological treatment. RESULTS: Of 300 new patients, 140 (47%) met criteria for one or more DSM IV anxiety or depressive diagnosis. Major depression was the most common (27%). A comparison of patients with and without emotional disorder showed that physical function, physical role functioning, bodily pain, and social functioning were worse in patients with emotional disorders (p<0. 0005). The median number of somatic symptoms was greater in patients with emotional disorders (p<0.0005). These differences were independent of the presence of neurological disease. Few patients wished to receive psychiatric or psychological treatments. Both general practitioners and neurologists were more likely to recommend psychiatric treatment when the patients' symptoms were medically unexplained. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of new referrals to general neurology clinics met criteria for a DSM IV psychiatric diagnosis. These patients were more disabled, and had more somatic symptoms. They expressed little enthusiasm for receiving psychiatric treatment.

Do medically unexplained symptoms matter? A prospective cohort study of 300 new referrals to neurology outpatient clinics.

OBJECTIVES: To determine (a) the proportion of patients referred to general neurology outpatient clinics whose symptoms are medically unexplained; (b) why they were referred; (c) health status and emotional disorder in this group compared with patients whose symptoms are explained by "organic" neurological disease. METHODS: The prospective cohort study with case note follow up at 6 months was carried out in the regional neurology service in Lothian, Scotland with 300 newly referred outpatients. Neurologists rated the degree to which patients' symptoms were explained by organic disease (organicity), GPs' reasons for referral, health status (SF-36), anxiety, and depressive disorders (PRIME-MD), RESULTS: Of 300 new patients 11% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 7%-14%) had symptoms that were rated as "not at all explained" by organic disease, 19% (15% to 23%) "somewhat explained", 27% (22% to 32%) "largely explained", and 43% (37% to 49%) "completely explained" by organic disease. Reason for referral was not associated with "organicity". Comparison of these groups showed that although physical function was similar, the median number of physical symptoms and pain were greater in patients with lower organicity ratings (p<0.0005, p<0. 0005). Depressive and anxiety disorders were more common in patients with symptoms of lower organicity (70% of patients in the not at all group had an anxiety or depressive disorder compared with 32% in the completely explained group (p<0.0005). CONCLUSION: One third of new referrals to general neurology clinics have symptoms that are poorly explained by identifiable organic disease. These patients were disabled and distressed. They deserve more attention.

Psychological morbidity and HIV in Kenya.

This paper describes a cross-sectional study with subjects and raters blind to HIV status to assess psychiatric morbidity associated with HIV in a sample of working adults in Western Kenya. Subjects were recruited from an occupational health clinic for statutory annual health checks of workers in the food industry. Psychiatric interviews and neuropsychological tests were conducted. Of 230 subjects, 34% were HIV positive. Women had a higher rate than men, and those who worked as bargirls or were divorced, widowed or separated were particularly at risk. There were no substantial differences in psychiatric morbidity or neuropsychological functioning between the HIV-positive and HIV-negative subjects.

PIP: As part of a Kenyan Medical Research Institute study of sexually transmitted diseases, psychiatric and neuropsychological functioning was assessed and related to HIV status. All 373 workers in the food industry who attended an occupational health clinic in Kenya's Nyanza Province for statutory annual health checks during a 10-week period in 1994, were eligible for study enrollment. Of the 337 study volunteers (mean age, 29.1 years), HIV status was available for only 230 subjects due to the loss of specimens between collection and laboratory delivery or the illegibility of numerical codes on specimen tubes; psychiatric and neuropsychological data were collected from 229. 78 workers (34%) were HIV-positive and another 14 (6%) had indeterminate results. No substantial differences in psychiatric morbidity, including depression or performance on neuropsychological tests, were found between HIV-positive workers and HIV-negative controls. Previous studies have documented substantial psychiatric morbidity and cognitive impairment in HIV-infected patients. The methodology of the present study differed from previous research, however, in that volunteers were asymptomatic and unaware they were being tested for HIV and interviewers were uninformed as to the subject's HIV status.