Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ulster Med J ; 78(2): 105-12, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19568446

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Non-epithelial breast malignancies include primary lymphomas, sarcomas, haematological malignancies, melanomas as well as secondary metastases to the breast. They account for less than 1% of all breast tumours. The demographics and clinical features are similar to epithelial breast cancers but the prognosis and management options are often very different. Most reported series are small with limited follow-up. The main aim of this study was to review our experience for these malignancies and to compare this with the published literature. METHODS: A 14-year retrospective review of all breast resection specimens was completed in the Antrim Area Hospital Cancer Unit. Clinical records of patients diagnosed with non-epithelial breast malignancies were then reviewed for data regarding patient demographics, clinical presentation, pre-operative investigations, operative findings and outcome. Pathology reports were examined carefully for tumour type, location and for evidence of lymphovascular spread. This data was compared with the available literature. RESULTS: Nineteen (F = 16) patients were found to have non-epithelial breast malignancies between April 1994 and August 2007. Mean age was 61.6 years (range 25-86). 17 patients (89.5%) presented with a palpable lump, mastalgia or skin change, while 2 (10.5%) patients' tumours were detected through screening. The histological types of non-epithelial malignancies were as follows: lymphoma (n = 8; M = 1 and F = 7, mean age: 68.5 range 52-86), sarcoma (n = 5; M = 1 and F = 4, mean age 56.4 range 29-69), malignant melanoma (n = 3; M = 1 and F = 2, mean age 54.3 range 25-70), multiple myeloma (n = 1; F, 71), metastatic renal cell carcinoma (n = 1; F, 63) and metastatic carcinoid tumour (n = 1; F, 52). The mean follow-up was 1541 days (32-4589 days). Nine patients were alive at the end of follow-up. Only 1 of 11 deaths was not directly related to the malignancy. The average time from surgery to death was 798.5 days (range 32-3248 days). CONCLUSION: Non-epithelial breast malignancies are rare cancers with significant mortality rates. Correct diagnosis and avoidance of inappropriate therapies requires a comprehensive triple assessment and a multidisciplinary management approach.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Lymphoma/pathology , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplasm Metastasis , Northern Ireland/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/pathology
2.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 22(10): 1239-48, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17447078

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Appendiceal neoplasms, first described in 1882, are still rare, with pre-operative diagnosis invariably difficult. We present our 10-year experience of these lesions with a review of current epidemiology, pathology and treatment modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective histopathological review of all appendicectomy specimens was completed between April 1994 and December 2003 to identify patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasms. Patient demographics, operative details, histopathology and clinical outcomes were obtained from case notes. A literature search of the PubMed database was then performed using the medical search headings; appendix, tumour, neoplasm and malignancy. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (eight men) were identified during the study period, with no age difference between gender (mean age in women 58, range 14-83 vs mean age in men 55, range 16-78). Eleven patients were found to have carcinoid-type tumours, eight patients with adenocarcinomas and three patients with lymphomas. Other appendiceal pathologies were identified after appendicectomies, hemicolectomy and oophorectomy. Mean follow-up was 41 months (range 1-125 months). Fourteen patients were alive at the end of follow-up. Patients with classical carcinoid tumours (CCT) had better outcomes than patients with the goblet cell carcinoid, adenocarcinoma and lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: From our own experience and a subsequent review of the literature, we recommend right hemicolectomy as the treatment of choice for all malignant appendiceal neoplasms, except for small CCT less than 2 cm in diameter at the tip of the appendix, with a low proliferative index, without angiolymphatic or mesoappendiceal extension. Further adjuvant therapy should be considered after oncological assessment.


Subject(s)
Appendiceal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Appendiceal Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Appendiceal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Appendiceal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...