Impact of a transitions of care pilot service established by pharmacy residents within an academic medical center.

OBJECTIVES: The impact of a pharmacy postgraduate year (PGY)-2 resident-led transitions of care (TOC) pilot service targeting patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) and heart failure (HF) was evaluated in terms of 30-day hospital readmissions (primary objective) at the University of Louisville Hospital (ULH) and 30-day emergency department (ED) visits at ULH (secondary objective). SETTING: The study was conducted at an urban academic teaching hospital. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Before this pilot service, there were no formal TOC services for patients at high risk for readmission to ULH. PRACTICE INNOVATION: The TOC pilot service providing coverage 16 h/week included patients aged at least 18 years admitted to the ULH internal medicine team with a primary or secondary diagnosis of COPD or HF. Patients to be discharged to a location other than home or who could not be contacted after discharge were excluded. The service consisted of pharmacist-patient interactions before discharge; within 72 hours after discharge, over the telephone; and 7-14 days after discharge, in person. EVALUATION: Data were collected by retrospective chart review from patients enrolled between November 2017 and October 2018. For comparison, a computer-generated report identified patients who met the criteria for the pilot service but could not be enrolled. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients enrolled in the TOC pilot service, none required readmission to ULH within 30 days, compared with 12.3% of all other eligible patients. Similarly, no patients enrolled in the TOC pilot service presented to the ED within 30 days after discharge, compared with 18.6% of the comparator group. Completion rates of postdischarge follow-up were 65.2% for the telephone call and 52.2% for the clinic visit. CONCLUSION: PGY-2 ambulatory care pharmacy residents implemented a new TOC service that contributed to lower rates of 30-day readmissions and ED visits than those for other eligible patients.

Impact of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis on postoperative hemorrhage following operative stabilization of spine fractures.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic anticoagulation may decrease the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with spine fractures following blunt trauma but comes with the threat of postoperative bleeding in patients requiring stabilization of these fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative anticoagulation on VTE and bleeding complications in patients with blunt spine fractures requiring operative stabilization. METHODS: All patients with blunt spine fractures requiring operative stabilization over a 6-year period were identified. Patients with a hospital stay of less than 48 hours or missing data were excluded. Patients were stratified by age; severity of shock, spinal cord injury, fracture location, injury severity; and timing and duration of anticoagulation. Outcomes included bleeding complications (wound hematoma/infection and development of epidural hematoma) and VTE (pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis). Outcomes were evaluated to determine risk factors for bleeding complications and VTE in the management of operative spine fractures. RESULTS: Seven hundred five patients were identified: 355 patients received one dose or more of preoperative anticoagulation, and 350 did not receive preoperative anticoagulation. Seventy-two percent were male, with a mean injury severity score and Glasgow Coma Scale score of 21 and 14, respectively. Bleeding complications occurred in 18 patients (2.6%), and 20 patients (2.8%) had VTE. Patients with VTE were more severely injured (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 vs 15, p ≤ 0.001 and injury severity score of 27 vs 18, p = 0.008). Despite longer time to mobilization (4 vs 2 days, p < 0.001), patients who received 50% or more of their scheduled preoperative doses had fewer episodes of pulmonary embolism (0.4% vs 2.2%, p < 0.05), with no difference in bleeding complications (2.1% vs 2.9%, p = 0.63) compared to patients who received either no preoperative anticoagulation or less than 50% of their scheduled preoperative doses. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anticoagulation in patients with operative spine fractures reduced the risk of pulmonary embolism without increasing bleeding complications. Preoperative anticoagulation is both safe and beneficial in patients with operative spine fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV.