ABSTRACT
The crystal structure and magnetic properties of two all-pyrazine-bridged antiferromagnetic spin ladders are reported. The complexes, catena-(bis(3-X-4-pyridone)(µ-pyrazine)copper(II)(-µ-pyrazine)diperchlorate ([Cu(pz)1.5(L)2](ClO4)2 where L = 3-X-4-pyridone and X = Br (1) or Cl (2)), contain copper(II)-based ladders in which both the rung and rail bridges are pyrazine molecules bonded through the x2-y2 orbital of the copper(II) ions. This structural scaffold is proposed to approach the isotropic spin-ladder regime. 1 and 2 crystallize in the monoclinic space group P21/c. Due to the bulk of the 3-X-4-HOpy ligands, the ladders are well isolated in the a-direction (1, 15.6 Å; 2, 15.5 Å). The ladders, which run in the b-direction, are stacked in the c-direction with the separation (1, 7.87 Å; 2, 7.82 Å) between copper(II) ions caused by the bulk of a semi-coordinate perchlorate ion coordinated in the axial position. Computational evaluation of magnetic JAB couplings between Cu-moieties of 2 supports the experimentally proposed magnetic topology and agrees with an isolated isotropic spin-ladder (Jrail = -4.04 cm-1 (-5.77 K) and Jrung = -3.89 cm-1 (-5.56 K)). These complexes introduce a convenient scaffold for synthesizing isotropic spin-ladders with modest superexchange interactions, the strength of which may be tuned by variations in L. The magnetic susceptibility down to 1.8 K, for both compounds, is well described by the strong-rung ladder model giving nearly isotropic exchange with Jrung ≈ Jrail ≈ -5.5 K (1) and -5.9 K (2) using the Hamiltonian. Theoretical simulations of the magnetic response of 2 using the isotropic ladder model are in excellent agreement with experiment. The measured magnetization to 5 T indicates a quantum-dominated magnetic spectrum. Again, calculated lower and saturation (4.3 and 24 T, respectively) critical fields for 2 are consistent with experimental measurements, and magnetization data at very low temperatures indeed suggest the presence of quantum effects. Further, the computational study of short- and long-range spin ordering indicates that a 2D-to-3D crossover might be feasible at lower temperatures. Analysis of the Boltzmann population corroborates the presence of accessible triplet states above the singlet ground state enabling the aforementioned 2D-to-3D crossover.
ABSTRACT
The title compound H2L(CuCl3H2O)Cl (H2L = 1-(4'-pyridinium)pyridin-4-ol-ium), 1) was synthesized and investigated structurally and magnetically as well as via a first-principles, bottom-up theoretical analysis of the potential magnetic superexchange pathways. Compound 1 can be described structurally as a well-isolated, distorted 2D-honeycomb lattice with two potential exchange pathways: a dimeric interaction via hydrogen-bonded pairs of (CuCl3H2O) ions and a chain structure via bridging chloride ions. Surprisingly, the experimental magnetic data are best fitted using both a simple dimer model with a Curie-Weiss correction for interdimer exchange (Jdimer = -107.4(1) K, θ = -1.22(4) K) and a strong-rung ladder model (Jrung = -105.8(7) K, Jrail = 2(7) K). Theoretical analysis at the UB3LYP/6-31+G(d) level supports the strong exchange observed through the [CuCl4(H2O)]2- dimer moiety superexchange pathway (-102 K = -71 cm-1). However, the apparent vanishingly small exchange through the single halide bridge is merely a brute average of competing ferromagnetic (FM) (+24.8 K = +17.0 cm-1) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) (-21.0 K = -14.6 cm-1) exchange interactions. Our computational study shows that these fitting parameters carry no physical meaning since a honeycomb plaquette must be taken as magnetic building block for 1. The competition between FM and AFM pair interactions leads to geometrical frustration in 1 and could induce interesting magnetic response at low temperatures, if the magnetic exchange is adequately tuned by modifying substituents in ligands and, in turn, interactions within the crystal packing.
ABSTRACT
The nature of intermolecular interactions between dicoordinate Cu(I) ions is analyzed by means of combined theoretical and structural database studies. Energetically stable Cu(I).Cu(I) interactions are only found when the two monomers involved in the interaction are neutral or carry opposite charges, thus allowing us to speak of bonding between the components of the bimolecular aggregate. A perturbative evaluation of the components of the intermolecular interaction energies, by means the IMPT scheme of Stone, indicates that both the Coulombic and dispersion forces are important in determining the Cu(I).Cu(I) bonding interactions, because only a small part of that energy is attributable to Cu.Cu interactions, while a large component results from Cu.ligand interactions. The electrostatic component is the dominant one by far in the interaction between charged monomers, while in the interaction between neutral complexes, the electrostatic component is found to be of the same order of magnitude as the dispersion term. Bimolecular aggregates that have like charges are repulsive by themselves, and their presence in the solid state results from anion.cation interactions with ions external to this aggregate. In these cases, the short-contact Cu.Cu interactions here should be more properly called counterion-mediated Cu.Cu bonds.
ABSTRACT
The distribution of di-, tri-, and tetracoordination among the d(10) ions of the group 11 metals is theoretically analyzed by means of density functional calculations on more than 150 model complexes of general formula [MX(m)L(n)](1-m) (where M = Cu, Ag, or Au; L = NH(3) or PH(3); X = Cl, Br, or I; m + n = 2-4). The energy of a ligand association reaction has been found to be practically determined by two contributions: the interaction energy and the energy of deformation of the metal coordination sphere. The larger deformation energy of gold complexes compared to copper and silver ones explains the predominance of dicoordination among Au(I) complexes, in comparison with Cu(I) and Ag(I), for which dicoordination is far less common than tri- and tetracoordination. Other experimental trends can be explained by looking at the fine details of these two energetic components.
