In silico description of the adsorption of cell signaling pathway proteins ovalbumin, glutathione, LC3, TLR4, ASC PYCARD, PI3K and NF-Kß on 7.0 nm gold nanoparticles: obtaining their Lennard-Jones-like potentials through docking and molecular mechanics.

The impact of vaccination on the world's population is difficult to calculate. For developing different types of vaccines, adjuvants are substances added to vaccines to increase the magnitude and durability of the immune response and the effectiveness of the vaccine. This work explores the potential use of spherical gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as adjuvants. Thus, we employed docking techniques and molecular mechanics to describe how a AuNP 7.0 nm in diameter interacts with cell signaling pathway proteins. Initially, we used X-ray crystallization data of the proteins ovalbumin, glutathione, LC3, TLR4, ASC PYCARD, PI3K, and NF-Kß to study the adsorption with an AuNP through molecular docking. Therefore, interaction energies were obtained for the AuNP complexes and individual proteins, as well as the AuNP and OVA complex (AuNP@OVA) with each cellular protein, respectively. Results showed that AuNPs had the highest affinity for OVA individually, followed by glutathione, ASC PYCARD domain, LC3, PI3K, NF-Kß, and TLR4. Furthermore, when evaluating the AuNP@OVA complex, glutathione showed a greater affinity with more potent interaction energy when compared to the other studied systems.

On the origin of immunopathology.

Stranded between medicine and experimental biology, immunology is buried in its own problems and remains distant from important areas of current biology, such as evolutionary theory, developmental biology and cognitive sciences. Immunology has treated the living system merely as the place or dimension in which immune activity takes place, inserted on a misleading axis (progressive responsiveness versus no response; memory versus tolerance) which neglects the analysis of a robustly stable dynamics which is always present and is neither tolerance nor immunity-a problem currently approached as one of "regulatory" activity. However, a regulatory response also demands regulation, leading to an endless recursion and the adoption of a stimulus-response framework inevitably drives us away from the physiological processes in which lymphocytes are involved. Herein, we propose that immunological physiology, like everything else in the body is dynamic and conservative. Immunopathology, including inherited immunodeficiencies, severe forms of infectious diseases, allergy and autoimmune diseases, are interferences with this stability which frequently include oligoclonal expansions of T lymphocytes. We suggest that this decrease in clonal diversity results from a loss of the stabilizing connectivity among lymphocytes and are not simply markers of immunopathology, but are rather expressions of basic pathogenic mechanisms. The so-called autoimmune diseases are examples of this disequilibrium. In the last decade the characterization of an enormous and diversified commensal microbiota has posed a new and pressing problem: how to explain the harmonic conviviality with trillions of foreign macromolecules. In addition, robustly stable relations towards macromolecular diet can be established by simple ingestion, a state presently labeled as "oral tolerance", a problem that has been buffered for decades as anti-inflammatory protection of the gut. A major change in terminology is necessary to describe this new panorama. We focus on two important gaps in immunological discussions: (a) the organism, seen simultaneously as the medium with which the immune system is constantly in touch and as the entity that mediates the contact with external materials; and (b) the observer, the immunologist, who operates as a human being in human languaging with other human beings, and characterizes immunological specificity. We acknowledge that we are proposing radical departures from current dogma and that we should justify them. Most of what we propose stem form a way of seeing called Biology of Cognition and Language, that derives from ideas of the neurobiologist/philosopher Humberto Maturana, also known as "autopoiesis theory".

Aging correlates with reduction in regulatory-type cytokines and T cells in the gut mucosa.

Aging is reported to be associated with decline in oral tolerance induction, which is initiated at the intestinal mucosal surface. Herein, we examined the effect of aging in T cells and cytokines at the intestinal mucosa that might be involved in oral tolerance induction. Frequencies of regulatory-type IEL subsets such as TCRγδ(+) and TCRαß(+)CD8αα(+) were lower in aged mice. Mucosal CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) and CD4(+)LAP(+) T cells increased with aging but activated CD44(+)CD4(+) mucosal T cells also augmented. Production of TGF-ß and IL-10 in the small intestine of old mice was reduced. Moreover, the ability of mucosal dendritic cells of aged mice to stimulate TGF-ß secretion and differentiation of CD4(+)LAP(+) T cells in co-culture studies also declined with aging. Reduction in these regulatory-type cytokines and T cells may help to explain the decline in susceptibility to oral induction during aging. However, not all mucosal regulatory elements were altered by aging and CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) T cells were especially resistant to changes. Persistence of some mechanisms of regulation may play a critical role in maintaining mucosal homeostasis during aging.

Indirect effects of oral tolerance improve wound healing in skin.

Tissue injury in adult mammalian skin frequently results in scarring while fetal mammalian skin heals with complete regeneration. Inflammatory reactions are among the factors thought to impair regeneration. Previous studies have shown that the injection of an immunologically tolerated protein blocks immune responses to unrelated antigens and is also able to inhibit inflammation in mice. This phenomenon, which we refer to as the indirect effects of oral tolerance, does not require the simultaneous injection of the tolerated antigen and the second antigen, and also occurs when the two antigens are given by separate routes of immunization. Herein, we investigated whether the i.p. injection of an orally tolerated antigen (ovalbumin, OVA) would inhibit inflammatory reactions at an incisional lesion and influence healing of adult mouse skin. In OVA-tolerant mice, the injection of OVA minutes before wounding altered inflammation: it reduced the numbers of mast cells, neutrophils, and lymphocytes but increased the number of macrophages around the lesion area. Tolerant mice also showed fewer myofibroblasts and reduced scar area. Furthermore, tolerant mice displayed a pattern of extracellular matrix deposition similar to that observed in intact skin, plus characteristics of regeneration, such as an increased deposition of fibronectin and tenascin-C. These observations suggest that the indirect effects of oral tolerance can alter the process of wound healing in skin and reduce scar formation.

Innate profiles of cytokines implicated on oral tolerance correlate with low- or high-suppression of humoral response.

SUMMARY: Oral tolerance (OT) is being studied with great interest because of its therapeutic potential in allergy and autoimmunity. In the present study, two mouse strains with extreme phenotypes of OT susceptibility (TS) or resistance (TR) to ovalbumin (OVA) were used to demonstrate whether the tr and ts genes, cumulated during 18 generations of bi-directional genetic selection, influence expression of immunobiological traits in naive or antigen-gavaged TR/TS mice. The difference in anti-OVA titres was 2048-fold between OVA-gavaged TS and TR mice. Tolerance susceptibility to OVA gavage in individuals from a (TS x TR)F(2) population was 24% high-susceptibility, 62% low-susceptibility and 14% non-tolerant. Different antigens, unrelated to OVA, were tested by gavage and TS mice were generally susceptible while TR mice were resistant. The stability of TS and TR phenotypes was not affected by the use of strict protocols of intraperitoneal immunization or feeding over 30 consecutive days. The levels of interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, interferon-gamma and IL-10 cytokines evaluated in concanavalin A-stimulated spleen cells from naive mice and in OVA-stimulated spleen cells from OVA-gavaged mice were higher in TS mice. Interleukin-10 was up-regulated in OVA-gavaged TS mice and down-regulated in TR mice. In naive mice, the percentage of CD4(+) CD25(+) and CD4(+) Foxp3(+) spleen cells and IL-10 expression by CD4(+) cells was significantly higher in TS mice. These results indicate that regulation of IL-10 expression could be an important factor contributing to the mechanisms controlling OT susceptibility, and that the OT responses of TR and TS individuals strongly correlate with their innate potential to secrete this cytokine.

Different requirements for the adoptive transfer of oral tolerance and its indirect effects assessed by DTH and antibody responses in mice.

Oral tolerance inhibits T-cell dependent reactions to antigens previously contacted by oral route. Parenteral re-exposure to orally-tolerated antigens inhibits immune responses to unrelated antigens, a phenomenon we have called "indirect effects" of oral tolerance. We examined the requirements of previous irradiation of C57BL/6 and BALB/c recipients to successful transfer of oral tolerance and its indirect effects using 1x10(8) splenocytes. When DTH reactions were evaluated, irradiation was not required to transfer both oral tolerance and its indirect effects. C57BL/6, but not BALB/c recipients, required irradiation to adopt suppressed antibody responses to tolerizing antigen. In BALB/c recipients, the indirect effect was transferred only if serum from the tolerant donors was added to the transferred splenocytes. CFSE labeled donor cells were not eliminated from non-irradiated C57BL/6, although unable to suppress antibody responses. Our results provide further evidences on the existence of a functional barrier in immunocompetent recipients that hinders the adoptive transfer of different immunological activities. Interactions between cells and serum components may be necessary to bypass this barrier.

Cell-mediated immune response to unrelated proteins and unspecific inflammation blocked by orally tolerated proteins.

Oral tolerance promotes a generalized decrease in specific immune responsiveness to proteins previously encountered via the oral route. In addition, parenteral immunization with a tolerated protein also triggers a significant reduction in the primary responsiveness to a second unrelated antigen. This is generally explained by 'innocent bystander suppression', suggesting that the transient and episodic effects of inhibitory cytokines released by contact with the tolerated antigen would block responses to the second antigen. In disagreement with this view, we have previously shown that: (i) these inhibitory effects do not require concomitance or contiguity of the injections of the two proteins; (ii) that intravenous or intragastric exposures to the tolerated antigen are not inhibitory; and (iii) that the inhibitory effect, once triggered, persists in the absence of further contact with the tolerated protein, possibly by inhibition of secondary responsiveness (immunological memory). The present work confirms that immunological memory of the second unrelated antigen is hindered by exposure to the tolerated antigen and, in addition, shows that this exposure: (i) inhibits the inflammation triggered by an unrelated antigen through the double effect of inhibiting production of leucocytes in the bone marrow and blocking their migration to inflammed sites; and (ii) significantly blocks footpaw swelling triggered by carrageenan. Taken together, these results conclusively demonstrate that inhibitory effects of parenteral injection of tolerated antigens are much more general than suggested by the 'innocent bystander suppression' hypothesis.

A molecular clock operates during chick autopod proximal-distal outgrowth.

Temporal control can be considered the fourth dimension in embryonic development. The identification of the somitogenesis molecular clock provided new insight into how embryonic cells measure time. We provide the first evidence of a molecular clock operating during chick fore-limb autopod outgrowth and patterning, by showing that the expression of the somitogenesis clock component hairy2 cycles in autopod chondrogenic precursor cells with a 6 h periodicity. We determined the length of time required to form an autopod skeletal limb element, and established a correlation between the latter and the periodicity of cyclic hairy2 gene expression. We suggest that temporal control exerted by cyclic gene expression can be a widespread mechanism providing cellular temporal information during vertebrate embryonic development.

The conservative physiology of the immune system. A non-metaphoric approach to immunological activity.

Historically, immunology emerged as a biomedical science, concerned with host defense and production of anti-infectious vaccines. In the late 50s, selective theories were proposed and from then on, immunology has been based in a close association with the neo-Darwinian principles, such as random generation of variants (lymphocyte clones), selection by extrinsic factors (antigens) - and, more generally, on genetic determinism and functionalism. This association has had major consequences: (1) immunological jargon is full of "cognitive" metaphors, founded in the idea of "foreignness"; (2) the immune system is described with a random clonal origin, coupled to selection by random encounters; and (3) physiological events are virtually absent from immunological descriptions. In the present manuscript, we apply systemic notions to bring forth an explanation including systemic mechanisms able to generate immunological phenomena. We replace "randomness plus selection" and the notion of foreignness by a history of structural changes which are determined by the coherences of the system internal architecture at any given moment. The importance of this systemic way of seeing is that it explicitly attends to the organization that defines the immune system, within which it is possible to describe the conservative physiology of the immune system. Understanding immune physiology in a systemic way of seeing also suggests mechanisms underlying the origin of immunopathogeny and therefore suggests new insights to therapeutic approaches. However, if seriously acknowledged, this systemic/historic approach to immunology goes along with a global conceptual change which modifies virtually everything in the domain of biology, as suggested by Maturana.

Systemic effects of oral tolerance on inflammation: mobilization of lymphocytes and bone marrow eosinopoiesis.

Oral tolerance is a T-cell mediated phenomenon defined by inhibition of immune responsiveness to a protein previously contacted by the oral route. Oral tolerance may prevent autoimmune and allergic diseases that involve the recruitment and/or activation of different cell types including mast cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes and lymphocytes. The mechanisms by which oral tolerance avoids these immunological disorders are still controversial. Herein we used a murine model of ovalbumin (OVA)-induced peritonitis to investigate the effect of oral tolerance on allergic inflammation. Frequency of leucocyte subpopulations was evaluated by global and differential cell counts in peritoneal lavage fluid, peripheral blood, and bone marrow. Changes on lymphocyte subsets and adhesion molecules expression by these cells were analysed by flow cytometry. As compared with OVA-immune mice, intraperitoneal challenge of tolerant animals with OVA resulted in a significantly milder peritonitis, mostly affecting neutrophils and eosinophils; a concomitant reduction in total white blood cell counts was also observed, mainly because of lower neutrophil and eosinophil counts. Eosinophils, but not neutrophils, were also reduced in the bone-marrow of OVA-challenged tolerant mice. No changes occurred in total peritoneal lymphocyte counts in OVA-tolerant mice, however, there was a significant decrease in CD3+ CD8+ T cells and an increase in B cells (CD45R+) in these animals as compared to immune OVA-challenged animals. Altered expression of CD18 and CD54, respectively, in blood and peritoneal lymphocytes was also noted. These results suggest that, in addition to local specific effects, oral tolerance has systemic effects on the mobilization of leucocytes and bone-marrow eosinopoiesis.

Genetic selection for resistance or susceptibility to oral tolerance to ovalbumin affects general mechanisms of tolerance induction in mice.

To study the genes involved in oral tolerance susceptibility, two strains of mice were genetically selected for susceptibility (TS) and resistance (TR) to oral tolerance to ovalbumin by bidirectional breeding. Herein we show that the genetic selection process is restricted neither to ovalbumin nor to oral tolerance. It affected oral tolerance to other proteins, such as casein, and tolerance induced the intravenous route.

Assimilation, tolerance and the end of innocence

Immunological activity is conceptually and biochemically related to digestion and assimilation processes. Food materials comprise the vast majority of foreign macromolecules handled by the organism. Lympphocyte activation involves partial digestion ("processing") of both foreign and self molecules. Immunoglobulins accelerate the clearance (by opsonization) and intracellular digestion of materials to which they bind. Immunological activity may, therefore, be seen as a network of processes facilitating the assimilation of foreign materials. This same network is continuously incorporating new (emergent) cellular and molecular components into the lymphoid system. In oral tolerance, the organism is usually seen as becoming permissive to the presence of previously ingested antigens, as if their presence remained unacknowledged. However, the exposure of orally-tolerant animals to the tolerated antigens blocks the concomitant induction of unrelated immune responses. The assimilation of tolerated antigens to the network of lymphocyte activities, therefore, may have broad consequences. We claim that these "indirect effects"of the tolerated antigen cannot be ascribed to "innocent bystander"suppression, i.e. to fortuitous proximity to cells releasing suppressive cytokines.