Post-exposure prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus after sexual assault in a Midwestern U.S. emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) play an essential role in the timely initiation of HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for sexual assault victims. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of sexual assault victims evaluated and offered HIV PEP in an urban academic ED between January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2018. Data on demographics, comorbidities, nature of sexual assault, initial ED care, subsequent healthcare utilization within 28 days of initial ED visit, and evidence of seroconversion within 6 months of the initial ED visit were obtained. Predictors of subsequent ED visit and follow-up in the infectious diseases clinic were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-three ED visits met criteria for inclusion in this study. Median age at ED presentation was 25 years (IQR 21-34 years), with the majority of victims being female (95.5%), Black (63.4%), unemployed (66.3%) and uninsured (53.9%); psychiatric comorbidities (38.8%) and substance abuse (23.6%) were common. About 87% of the patients accepted HIV PEP (368 of 423 ED visits). Age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p = 0.025) and sexual assault involving >1 assailant (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.88, p = 0.018) were associated with lower likelihood of HIV PEP acceptance. Ten patients (2.7%) followed up with the infectious disease clinic within 28 days of starting HIV PEP; 70 patients (19%) returned to the ED for care during the same time period. Psychiatric comorbidity (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.43-4.30, p = 0.001) and anal penetration (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.10-3.70, p = 0.024) were associated with greater likelihood of repeat ED visit; female gender (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.85, p = 0.023) was associated with lower likelihood of repeat visit. Completion of HIV PEP was documented for 14 (3.3%) individuals. CONCLUSIONS: While ED patient acceptance of HIV PEP after sexual assault was high, infectious disease clinic follow-up and documented completion of PEP remained low. Innovative care models bridging EDs to outpatient clinics and community support services are needed to optimize transitions of care for sexual assault victims, including those receiving HIV PEP.

Methods of estimating vancomycin use in an inpatient setting: days of therapy versus therapeutic drug monitoring-based exposure days.

Underestimating antimicrobial use based on days of therapy (DOT) is recognized for certain antimicrobial agents. We investigated the difference between DOT and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based exposure days in estimating vancomycin use and demonstrated that DOT may underestimate vancomycin exposure by ∼10%.

Incidence and etiology of fever following seasonal influenza vaccination in hospitalized patients.

We conducted a retrospective cohort to examine the incidence and etiology of fever postinfluenza vaccination among hospitalized patients during the 2015-2016 influenza season. Fever occurred in 63 (1.5%) of 4,185 vaccinated patients. Medical patients had fever predominantly associated with concurrent infections; surgical patients had fever explained by noninfectious etiologies.

A Cluster of Cefepime-induced Neutropenia During Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy.

A cluster of cefepime-induced neutropenia (CIN) was identified from June 2017 to May 2018 in a regional outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy population. Our data suggest prolonged courses of cefepime (≥2 weeks), administered by rapid intravenous push, were associated with a higher risk of CIN.

Telavancin for refractory MRSA bacteraemia in intermittent haemodialysis recipients.

Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) are at high risk of MRSA bacteraemia (MRSA-B) and often fail first-line therapy. The safety, effectiveness and optimal dosing of telavancin for MRSA-B in this patient population are unclear. Objectives: We aimed to describe clinical outcomes of telavancin in the treatment of refractory MRSA-B in patients with ESRD requiring IHD. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study of hospitalized patients at two tertiary care academic medical centres with recurrent or persistent (≥3 days) MRSA-B treated with telavancin monotherapy. Outcomes included duration of MRSA-B (pre-telavancin versus post-telavancin) and microbiological failure (duration of MRSA-B ≥3 days after initiation of telavancin). Results: Telavancin dosed 10 mg/kg three times weekly post-IHD or 10 mg/kg every 48 h resulted in microbiological cure in 7/8 (87.5%) refractory MRSA-B cases. Telavancin monotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in median duration of bacteraemia [16 days pre-telavancin (IQR 8-19 days) versus 1 day post-telavancin (IQR 0-2 days); P = 0.018]. Telavancin was well tolerated by all patients and no adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Telavancin was very safe and highly effective in the treatment of refractory MRSA-B in a cohort of patients with ESRD requiring IHD. These data support the utility of telavancin in the armamentarium against refractory MRSA-B, particularly in the high-risk IHD-dependent population.

Effective Antibiotic Conservation by Emergency Antimicrobial Stewardship During a Drug Shortage.

We present the first description of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) used to successfully manage a multi-antimicrobial drug shortage. Without resorting to formulary restriction, meropenem utilization decreased by 69% and piperacillin-tazobactam by 73%. During the shortage period, hospital mortality decreased (P=.03), while hospital length of stay remained unchanged. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:356-359.

Acute renal insufficiency during telavancin therapy in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the tolerance to long-term telavancin therapy among inpatients as it relates to nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of adult patients who received telavancin at the Barnes-Jewish Hospital from 1 September 2009 to 1 December 2010. Patients who received less than three doses of telavancin, were on haemodialysis prior to telavancin administration or died within 48 h of initial telavancin administration were excluded. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients received telavancin and met the inclusion criteria. Seven of 21 patients (33%) developed acute renal insufficiency during therapy. Patients who developed acute renal insufficiency had a mean glomerular filtration rate reduction of 56 mL/min/1.73 m(2). In the univariate analysis, high body mass index (P=0.025), use of intravenous contrast dye (P=0.017) and prior serum vancomycin trough levels >20 mg/L (P=0.017) were associated with developing acute renal insufficiency. Two patients required haemodialysis; two had persistent renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: Supratherapeutic vancomycin trough levels, high body mass index and receipt of intravenous contrast dye prior to telavancin therapy were associated with acute renal insufficiency.

Impact of prophylactic versus preemptive valganciclovir on long-term renal allograft outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Both prophylactic and preemptive oral valganciclovir therapy are effective for the management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) postrenal transplantation in the short term. The long-term effect of either strategy is less well defined. METHODS: We analyzed the data on 115 adult recipients previously enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial of prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy for CMV. The primary outcome was a composite of freedom from acute rejection, graft loss, or death. Secondary outcomes included individual primary outcomes, posttransplant cardiovascular events, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, achievement of goal blood pressure, change in body mass index, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, and change in renal function. The analysis period was a minimum of 48-month posttransplant or a date of death or graft loss, whichever was earlier. RESULTS: The primary outcome was similar between groups (83% prophylactic vs. 81% preemptive, P=0.754). The secondary outcomes showed similarities between the prophylactic and preemptive groups. Four patients in the prophylactic group (8%) compared with none in the preemptive group (0%) died with a functioning graft, P=0.043. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of sample size, our data suggest that either strategy for the management of CMV immediately after transplantation seems effective for patient and graft survival in the long term. CMV management is one of the many therapeutic strategies incorporated into a renal transplantation protocol, which often differs among institutions, and the decision as to which approach to use remains center- and resource-specific. The increased incidence of death in the prophylactic group requires further investigation.

Clinical, microbiologic, and genetic determinants of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSAB) often persists despite full susceptibility to vancomycin; therefore, associated factors were assessed. A retrospective cohort analysis of 222 patients with MRSAB treated with vancomycin was conducted; patients with persistent MRSAB (pMRSAB) were compared to those with nonpersistent bacteremia (NPB). Incidence of pMRSAB was 9%. More patients with vancomycin MIC = 2 mg/L had pMRSAB (16%) compared to patients with vancomycin MIC <2 mg/L (5%), P = 0.012. SCCmec type and Panton-Valentine leukocidin production were similar between patients with pMRSAB and NPB. There was no difference in vancomycin troughs, time to first dose, or area under the concentration-time curve/MIC between groups. More metastatic complications were observed in pMRSAB 63% versus NPB 32% (P = 0.005). Multivariate analysis found endocarditis (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; P = 0.021), complicated MRSAB (OR, 2.6; P = 0.009), vancomycin MIC = 2 (OR, 2.6; P = 0.009), and septic shock (OR 2.2 P = 0.031), which were independent predictors of pMRSAB.

Use of cytomegalovirus intravenous immune globulin for the adjunctive treatment of cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics and clinical outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients who received adjunctive cytomegalovirus intravenous immune globulin (CMV-IVIG) for probable or proven CMV disease. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large, university-affiliated, tertiary-care medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-five adult HSCT recipients who received at least one dose of CMV-IVIG for adjunctive treatment of probable or proven CMV disease between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2007. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All-cause mortality at hospital discharge was the primary outcome. All patients received an allogeneic HSCT. Twenty-six patients (74%) had pneumonitis, nine (26%) had enteritis, and 29 (83%) had CMV viremia. All patients received concomitant antiviral therapy; 31 (89%) received ganciclovir, and 14 (40%) received foscarnet. All-cause mortality at hospital discharge was 49% (17 patients). Patient characteristics associated with mortality included requiring intubation for CMV pneumonia (11 [79%] of 14 nonsurvivors vs 3 (25%) of 12 survivors, p=0.016) and earlier disease onset after HSCT (median 48 days for nonsurvivors vs 106 days for survivors, p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, only requiring intubation for CMV pneumonia remained a significant risk factor for increased mortality. A low rate of adverse events was attributed to CMV-IVIG, with mild hypertension (two patients [6%]) and erythema and chills (one patient [3%]) being the most common. CONCLUSION: The mortality rate in our study population was similar to previous reports in the literature and may be somewhat lower than rates reported with antiviral monotherapy. Our analysis suggests that factors associated with mortality include the need for intubation and, possibly, earlier onset of CMV disease after HSCT. Treatment with CMV-IVIG appears to be well tolerated in HSCT recipients. These findings support further trials of CMV-IVIG efficacy in this setting.

Assessment of an alternative meropenem dosing strategy compared with imipenem-cilastatin or traditional meropenem dosing after cefepime failure or intolerance in adults with neutropenic fever.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical outcomes of patients receiving an alternative dosage of meropenem with those of patients receiving imipenem-cilastatin or the traditional dosage of meropenem after failure of or intolerance to cefepime for treatment of febrile neutropenia. DESIGN: Retrospective, single-center cohort study. SETTING: 1250-bed urban academic medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-seven adults with neutropenic fever who received either imipenem-cilastatin or meropenem; imipenem-cilastatin was the preferred carbapenem until September 1, 2006, after which meropenem became the formulary carbapenem. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 127 patients, 40 received imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg every 6 hours between September 1, 2005, and August 31, 2006; 87 patients received meropenem between September 1, 2006, and August 31, 2007: 29 received a traditional dosage of meropenem 1 g every 8 hours, and 58 received an alternative dosage of meropenem 500 mg every 6 hours. Primary outcomes of time to defervescence (median 3 vs 2 vs 3 days), need for additional antibiotics (20% vs 17% vs 14%), and time to receipt of additional antibiotics (median 5 vs 2 vs 1 days) were not significantly different among the imipenem-cilastatin, traditionally dosed meropenem, and alternatively dosed meropenem groups, respectively. In addition, significant differences in secondary outcomes, which were treatment duration (median 10 vs 8 vs 8 days), seizure rate (0% vs 0% vs 0%), in-hospital mortality (5% vs 7% vs 7%), and 30-day mortality (13% vs 7% vs 14%), were not identified among the three groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The alternative meropenem dosage of 500 mg every 6 hours yielded similar patient outcomes, including time to defervescence, need for additional antibiotics, duration of therapy, and mortality, when compared with the traditional meropenem dosage and imipenem-cilastatin in adults with febrile neutropenia. In addition, no adverse effects on clinical outcomes were observed with the alternative dosage of meropenem.

Early clinical experience with anidulafungin at a large tertiary care medical center.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate early clinical experience with anidulafungin. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large, university-affiliated, tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: All patients receiving anidulafungin between July 15, 2006, and January 15, 2007. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-five patients received at least one dose of anidulafungin. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in all patients; efficacy outcomes were assessed in 13 patients who had a documented fungal infection and received anidulafungin for a minimum of 5 days. Common conditions at baseline were hepatic dysfunction (25 patients [71%]), severe sepsis (17 patients [49%]), and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (10 patients [29%]). Eight patients (23%) were receiving drugs with the potential to interact with echinocandins other than anidulafungin. Seventeen (49%) of the 35 patients received anidulafungin as empiric antifungal therapy. Anidulafungin was used to treat invasive candidiasis in seven patients (20%) and candidemia in 10 patients (29%); Candida albicans or Candida glabrata was isolated most frequently in these two infections combined (7 isolates each [41%]/17 infections). A favorable efficacy outcome was noted in 10 (77%) of 13 evaluable patients. One patient developed breakthrough Candida parapsilosis fungemia while receiving anidulafungin. Overall, anidulafungin was well tolerated, with only one patient having an infusion- related reaction. Anidulafungin was also well tolerated among patients receiving concomitant metronidazole. CONCLUSION: Anidulafungin was well tolerated and produced favorable outcomes in the majority of the patients evaluated. The availability of anidulafungin makes it a feasible option for antifungal therapy, particularly in patients who have hepatic dysfunction and in those who are receiving drugs than can interact with other echinocandins.