Comparison between 308-nm monochromatic excimer light and narrowband UVB phototherapy (311-313 nm) in the treatment of vitiligo--a multicentre controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is an acquired pigmentary disorder characterized by areas of depigmented skin resulting from loss of epidermal melanocytes. Recently, it has been shown that narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy may be more effective than psoralen and ultraviolet A (PUVA) photochemotherapy in treating vitiligo, and that 308-nm monochromatic excimer light (MEL) may present some advantages as compared to NB-UVB for the treatment of vitiligo. AIM The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of NB-UVB phototherapy and 308-nm MEL in vitiligo patients. METHODS: The study was done in a randomized, investigator-blinded and half-side comparison design. Twenty-one subjects with symmetrical vitiligo lesions were enrolled in this study. Vitiligo lesions on one body side were treated twice weekly for 6 months with 308-nm MEL, while NB-UVB phototherapy was used to treat lesions on the opposite side. RESULTS: At the end of the study six lesions (37.5%) treated with 308-nm MEL and only one lesion (6%) treated with NB-UVB achieved an excellent repigmentation (score 4) while four lesions (25%) treated with 308-nm MEL and five lesions (31%) treated with NB-UVB showed a good repigmentation (score 3). CONCLUSIONS: It appears that 308-nm MEL is more effective than NB-UVB in treating vitiligo lesions and it induces repigmentation more rapidly.

[Neonatal maculopapular exanthema revealing septicemia due to Klebsiella pneumoniae via maternofetal infection]. / Exanthème maculo-papuleux néonatal révélateur d'une septicémie à Klebsiella pneumoniaee par infection maternofoetale.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal exanthema of bacterial origin is caused very rarely by Gram-negative bacilli. We report a case of neonatal maculopapular exanthema evocative of Klebsiella pneumoniae septicemia resulting from maternofetal infection. OBSERVATION: On the fourth day of life, a newborn infant presented incipient morbilliform maculopapular exanthema on the face. During delivery, the mother had presented hyperthermia and meconium was found in the amniotic fluid. Clinical examination of the newborn was normal. No clinically obvious site of entry of infection was seen. Laboratory tests revealed major inflammatory syndrome. Blood cultures were positive for K. pneumoniae, which was also found in blood cultures from the mother. Screening for other causes of infection was negative. Parenteral antibiotics for 10 days yielded favorable results with simultaneous resolution of the exanthema, normalization of laboratory values and negative blood cultures. DISCUSSION: Exanthemas of infectious origin are not associated with any specific organism. The most common causative micro-organisms are Listeria monocytogenes, B streptococci, colibacilli, and more rarely, staphylococci. There have been reports of a number of cases of neonatal septicemia due to Gram-negative bacilli responsible for maculopapular exanthemas but the causative organism was not identified. To our knowledge, Klebsiella pneumoniae has never been incriminated in the appearance of this type of rash via maternofetal transmission. Consequently, the presence of neonatal exanthema should prompt screening for sepsis, even in the absence of other evocative signs, and in particular in settings of apyrexia.