Restless legs syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis: evaluation of risk factors and clinical impact.

INTRODUCTION: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a disorder characterised by an irresistible urge to move the legs, usually accompanied by unpleasant sensations. It is more frequent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than in the general population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of RLS, defined according to the 4 essential requirements included in the diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group, in a cohort of patients with MS; and to identify potential risk factors and the clinical impact of RLS. RESULTS: The sample included 120 patients with MS, with a mean age of symptom onset of 40 years and an average disease duration of 46 months. The prevalence rate of RLS was 23.3%. MS progression time was significantly shorter in patients with RLS (P=.001). A recent relapse, and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and neuropathic pain were significantly associated with risk of RLS (P=.001, P<.001, P<.001, and P=.001, respectively). In addition, patients with RLS had a greater risk of poor sleep quality, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and poor quality of life than those without RLS (P=.002, P=.017, P=.013, and P=.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RLS should be considered in the neurological evaluation of patients with MS; early diagnosis and treatment would improve the quality of life of patients with MS presenting RLS.

Síndrome de piernas inquietas en esclerosis múltiple: evaluación de factores de riesgo y repercusión clínica / Restless legs syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis: evaluation of risk factors and clinical impact

Introducción: El síndrome de piernas inquietas (SPI) es un trastorno caracterizado por la necesidad imperiosa de mover las piernas, estando a menudo acompañado de sensaciones desagradables. Su frecuencia es superior en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple (EM) que en la población general. Objetivos: Evaluar la prevalencia del SPI, según el cumplimiento de los 4 requisitos esenciales incluidos en los criterios diagnósticos propuestos por la International Restless leg syndrome study group (IRLSSG, 2003), en una cohorte de pacientes con EM e identificar posibles factores de riesgo y repercusión clínica. Resultados: Se incluyeron 120 pacientes con EM, con una edad media de inicio de 40 años y un tiempo medio de evolución de 46 meses. La prevalencia de SPI, según el cumplimiento de criterios diagnósticos de la IRLSSG, fue del 23,3%. El tiempo de evolución de EM, desde la aparición de los primeros síntomas, fue significativamente menor en pacientes con SPI (p=0,001). La presencia de un brote reciente, así como de síntomas de ansiedad, depresión y dolor neuropático se asociaron de forma significativa con el riesgo de SPI (p=0,001, p<0,001, p<0,001 y p=0,001, respectivamente). Además, los pacientes con SPI y EM presentaron mayor riesgo de mala calidad de sueño, fatiga, somnolencia diurna y peor calidad de vida, que aquellos sin SPI (p=0,002, p=0,017, p=0,013 y p=0,009, respectivamente). Conclusiones: El SPI debe ser considerado en la evaluación neurológica de pacientes con EM, cuyo diagnóstico y tratamiento precoz mejoraría la calidad de vida de estos sujetos. (AU)

Introduction: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a disorder characterised by an irresistible urge to move the legs, usually accompanied by unpleasant sensations. It is more frequent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than in the general population. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of RLS, defined according to the 4 essential requirements included in the diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group, in a cohort of patients with MS; and to identify potential risk factors and the clinical impact of RLS. Results: The sample included 120 patients with MS, with a mean age of symptom onset of 40 years and an average disease duration of 46 months. The prevalence rate of RLS was 23.3%. MS progression time was significantly shorter in patients with RLS (P = 0.001). A recent relapse, and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and neuropathic pain were significantly associated with risk of RLS (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). In addition, patients with RLS had a greater risk of poor sleep quality, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and poor quality of life than those without RLS (P = 0.002, P = 0.017, P = 0.013, and P = 0.009, respectively). Conclusions: RLS should be considered in the neurological evaluation of patients with MS; early diagnosis and treatment would improve the quality of life of patients with MS presenting RLS.

Restless legs syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis: evaluation of risk factors and clinical impact. / Síndrome de piernas inquietas en esclerosis múltiple: evaluación de factores de riesgo y repercusión clínica.

INTRODUCTION: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a disorder characterised by an irresistible urge to move the legs, usually accompanied by unpleasant sensations. It is more frequent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than in the general population. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of RLS, defined according to the 4 essential requirements included in the diagnostic criteria proposed by the International Restless Leg Syndrome Study Group, in a cohort of patients with MS; and to identify potential risk factors and the clinical impact of RLS. RESULTS: The sample included 120 patients with MS, with a mean age of symptom onset of 40 years and an average disease duration of 46 months. The prevalence rate of RLS was 23.3%. MS progression time was significantly shorter in patients with RLS (P = 0.001). A recent relapse, and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and neuropathic pain were significantly associated with risk of RLS (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). In addition, patients with RLS had a greater risk of poor sleep quality, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and poor quality of life than those without RLS (P = 0.002, P = 0.017, P = 0.013, and P = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RLS should be considered in the neurological evaluation of patients with MS; early diagnosis and treatment would improve the quality of life of patients with MS presenting RLS.

[HLA-DRB1 typing in Caucasians patients with neuromyelitis optica]. / HLA-DRB1 en pacientes caucasicos con neuromielitis optica.

INTRODUCTION: The existence of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP-4-ab) has identified neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and multiple sclerosis (MS) as different diseases. Although HLA-DRB1 alleles contribute to MS risk, recent studies suggest that HLA back-ground differs between patients with NMO or MS in non-Caucasians populations. Our study was aimed to analyze HLA-DRB1 distribution in Caucasians NMO patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We recruited a cohort of 22 NMO patients (73% were AQP-4-ab positive), 228 MS patients and 225 healthy controls from Spain and we genotyped the HLA-DRB1 locus. Then, we performed a pool analysis using reported data from 45 NMO patients (53% were AQP-4-ab positive), 156 MS patients and 310 healthy controls from Caucasian French population. RESULTS: In the Spanish cohort, NMO was associated with increased frequency of DRB1*10 allele compared with MS (odds ratio, OR = 15.1; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 3.26-69.84; p = 0.012). In the pooled analysis, by comparison with healthy controls, NMO was associated with increased frequency of DRB1*03 allele (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.44-3.58; p < 0.0008) which was related to AQP-4-ab seropositivity (OR = 2.74; 95% CI = 1.58-4.77; p < 0.0008). By contrast, MS was associated with increased frequency of DRB1*15 allele (OR = 2.09; 95% CI = 1.62-2.68; p < 0.0008) and decreased frequency of DRB1*07 allele (OR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.44-0.78; p < 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Caucasian patients with NMO and MS have a different HLA-DRB1 allelic distribution. DRB1*03 allele seems to contribute to NMO seropositivity. Multicenter collaborative efforts are needed to adequately address the genetic contribution to NMO susceptibility.

[The Andalusia Epilepsy Society's Guide to Epilepsy Therapy 2005: IV. General principles of antiepileptic polytherapy and therapeutic strategies in refractory epilepsy]. / Guía terapéutica en epilepsia de la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia 2005: IV. Principios generales de politerapia antiepiléptica y estrategias terapéuticas en epilepsia refractaria.

AIMS: The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. DEVELOPMENT: A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology's Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies' criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care.

[The Andalusia Epilepsy Society's Guide to Epilepsy Therapy 2005: III. Antiepileptic therapy in special situations]. / Guia terapeutica en epilepsia de la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia 2005: III. Tratamiento antiepileptico en situaciones especiales.

AIMS: The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. DEVELOPMENT: A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology's Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies' criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care.

[The Andalusia Epilepsy Society's Guide to Epilepsy Therapy 2005: II. Chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs in adults and in children]. / Guia terapéutica en epilepsia de la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia 2005: II. Terapéutica antiepiléptica crónica en el adulto y en el nino.

AIMS: The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. DEVELOPMENT: A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology's Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies' criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care.

Guía terapéutica en epilepsia de la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia 2005: IV. Principios generales de politerapia antiepiléptica y estrategias terapéuticas en epilepsia refractaria / The andalusia epilepsy society´s guide to epilesy therapy 2005: IV general principles of antiepileptic polytherapy and therapeutic strategies in refractory epilepsy

Aims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care (AU)

Objetivo. Elaborar una guía de práctica clínica basada en la evidencia científica que aborde las cuestiones básicas acerca del tratamiento de la epilepsia. Desarrollo. Un comité de 11 expertos pertenecientes a la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia, en el que se incluían seis neurólogos, tres neuropediatras, un neurocirujano y una farmacóloga, todos con especial dedicación y competencia en epilepsia, realizó una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva en busca de las evidencias disponibles relacionadas con el tema propuesto. Se utilizaron las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library y bases de datos de guías de práctica clínica (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence y Guías Clínicas de la Academia Americana de Neurología). La guía se estructuró en siete secciones y se dividió para su publicación en cuatro partes. Se identificaron 187 documentos relevantes, de los que se extrajeron un total de 63 evidencias científicas y 91 recomendaciones terapéuticas, que se tabularon y clasificaron según los criterios de elaboración de Guías de Práctica Clínica de la Federación Europea de Sociedades Neurológicas. Conclusión. Los resultados de esta revisión proveen unas guías de práctica clínica basadas en la evidencia científica útiles, sencillas y aplicables en los diferentes niveles asistenciales (AU)

[The Andalusia Epilepsy Society's Guide to Epilepsy Therapy 2005: I. Criteria for starting and discontinuing and the pharmacological bases of antiepileptic treatment]. / Guía terapéutica en epilepsia de la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia 2005: I. Criterios de inicio y cese y bases farmacológicas del tratamiento antiepiléptico.

AIMS: The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. DEVELOPMENT: A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology's Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies' criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care.

Guía terapéutica en epilepsia de la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia 2005: I. Criterios de inicio y cese y bases farmacológicas del tratamiento antiepiléptico / The Andalusia epilepsy society’s guide to epilepsy therapy 2005: I. criteria for starting and discontinuing and the pharmacological bases of antiepileptic treatment

Objetivo. Elaborar una guía de práctica clínica basada en la evidencia científica que aborde las cuestiones básicas acerca del tratamiento de la epilepsia. Desarrollo. Un comité de 11 expertos pertenecientes a la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia, en el que se incluían seis neurólogos, tres neuropediatras, un neurocirujano y una farmacóloga, todos con especial dedicación y competencia en epilepsia, realizó una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva en busca de las evidencias disponibles relacionadas con el tema propuesto. Se utilizaron las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library y bases de datos de guías de práctica clínica (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence y Guías Clínicas de la Academia Americana de Neurología). La guía se estructuró en siete secciones y se dividió para su publicación en cuatro partes. Se identificaron 187 documentos relevantes de los que se extrajeron un total de 63 evidencias científicas y 91 recomendaciones terapéuticas, que se tabularon y clasificaron según los criterios de elaboración de Guías de Práctica Clínica de la Federación Europea de Sociedades Neurológicas. Conclusión. Los resultados de esta revisión proveen unas guías de práctica clínica basadas en la evidencia científica útiles, sencillas y aplicables en los diferentes niveles asistenciales

Aims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health careAims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care

Guía terapéutica en epilepsia de la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia 2005: II. Terapéutica antiepiléptica crónica en el adulto y en el niño / The Andalusia epilepsy society’s guide to epilepsy therapy 2005: II. chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs in adults and in children

Objetivo. Elaborar una guía de práctica clínica basada en la evidencia científica que aborde las cuestiones básicas acerca del tratamiento de la epilepsia. Desarrollo. Un comité de 11 expertos pertenecientes a la Sociedad Andaluza de Epilepsia, en el que se incluían seis neurólogos, tres neuropediatras, un neurocirujano y una farmacóloga, todos con especial dedicación y competencia en epilepsia, realizó una revisión bibliográfica exhaustiva en busca de las evidencias disponibles relacionadas con el tema propuesto. Se utilizaron las siguientes bases de datos: MEDLINE, Cochrane-Library y bases de datos de guías de práctica clínica (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence y Guías Clínicas de la Academia Americana de Neurología). La guía se estructuró en siete secciones y se dividió para su publicación en cuatro partes. Se identificaron 187 documentos relevantes, de los que se extrajeron un total de 63 evidencias científicas y 91 recomendaciones terapéuticas, que se tabularon clasificándolas según los criterios de elaboración de Guías de Práctica Clínica de la Federación Europea de Sociedades Neurológicas. Conclusión. Los resultados de esta revisión proveen unas guías de práctica clínica basadas en la evidencia científica útiles, sencillas y aplicables en los diferentes niveles asistenciales

Aims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health careAims. The objective of this work was to produce a scientific evidence-based guide to clinical practice dealing with the basic questions concerning the treatment of epilepsy. Development. A committee of 11 experts belonging to the Andalusia Epilepsy Society, made up of six neurologists, three neuropaediatricians, one neurosurgeon and a pharmacologist, all of whom were deeply involved and experienced in epilepsy, conducted a thorough review of the literature in search of all the evidence available on the proposed subject matter. The following databases were used: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and the databases of several clinical practice guidelines (National Guideline Clearinghouse, National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the American Academy of Neurology’s Clinical Guidelines). The Guide was set out in seven sections and was published in four parts. From a total number of 187 relevant documents, the committee found 63 examples of scientific evidence and 91 therapeutic recommendations. These were tabulated and classified according to the European Federation of Neurological Societies’ criteria for producing Clinical Practice Guidelines. Conclusions. The results of this survey provide scientific evidence-based clinical guidelines that are useful, simple and applicable at different levels of health care

[Uremic myopathy]. / Miopatía urémica.

INTRODUCTION: The neurological features of chronic renal failure are very varied. Uremic myopathy is a controversial condition. In most cases it is related to the secondary hyperparathyroidism which these patients develop, and its characteristics are superimposed on their osteomalacia myopathy. CLINICAL CASES AND CONCLUSIONS: We report two patients with terminal chronic renal failure on hemodialysis who complained on difficulty with walking. The clinical findings, laboratory and neurophysiological investigations and the histopathological report of the muscle biopsy were similar to those of osteomalacia myopathy. The muscle weakness of patients with terminal chronic renal failure is related to many factors. The most important of these is the secondary hyperparathyroidism which leads to osteomalacia myopathy. On muscle biopsy there was isolated fibre necrosis of both types 1 and 2 (case 1) and of type 2 alone (case 2), which is considered to be the commonest finding. Although treatment with high doses of vitamin D3, or its hydroxylated metabolites, has been recommended, it was not effective in our patients.

[Lumbosacral plexopathy as a form of presentation of an aneurysm of the iliac artery]. / Plexopatía lumbosacra como forma de presentación de un aneurisma de la arteria ilíaca.

INTRODUCTION: The etiology of lumbosacral plexopathy is often due to compression. One of the less common causes of this is aneurysm of the iliac artery. However, 13% of the patients with this disorder initially have symptoms of plexus irritation or deficit. CLINICAL CASE: We describe the case of a 42 year-old-man, with no previous medical history, who complained of right-sided sciatica for the previous three months. On examination there were clinical signs of a lesion of the right lumbosacral plexus. On CT of the pelvis and MR of the lumbar spine there were images compatible with an aneurysm of the right iliac artery. This diagnosis was confirmed on arteriography. Treatment was surgical (aneurysmography and right iliofemoral by-pass). The pain disappeared and the motor deficit improved considerably. CONCLUSION: When a patient presents with lumbosacral plexopathy, an iliac aneurysm should be considered as a possible etiological factor. In such cases early diagnosis is essential, since surgical treatment will usually resolve the clinical problem.

[Pourfour du Petit syndrome]. / Síndrome de Pourfour du Petit.

The Pourfour du Petit's syndrome is characterized by the unilateral appearance of mydriasis, lid retraction and exophthalmos. It suggests the existence of a localized oculosympathetic hyperactivity. It tends be to caused by injuries that suppose a stimulus of the sympathetics fibers at level of the proximal portion of the first dorsal root or in the cervical sympathetic chain. We report the clinical case of a young patient who developed a Pourfour du Petit's syndrome secondary to a small condrosarcoma of the proximal portion of the first rib. The observation of this syndrome is exceptional but its knowledge permits, by the great topographic value that possesses, a rapid identification of the causative injury.

[Bilateral hypoacusia and basilar dolichoectasia]. / Hipoacusia bilateral y dolicoectasia basilar.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical findings of basilar dolichoectasia (DB) are caused by compression of the cranial nerves, vertebrobasilar ischaemia, hydrocephaly and compression of the brainstem. Hypoacusia as an isolated finding in DB is very rare. CLINICAL CASE: We describe the case of a 48-year-old hypertensive man with bilateral hypoacusia as an isolated finding in DB. Diagnosis was made on MR, and arteriography showed changes characteristic of an anomalous blood vessel. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hypoacusia of uncertain aetiology, specially if they are also hypertensive, one should rule out the possibility of DB using cerebral magnetic resonance or angioresonance.