Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Radiol Med ; 116(6): 919-31, 2011 Sep.
Article in English, Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21509550

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This paper evaluates the indications, techniques, results, and complications of intra-arterial thrombolysis with or without a multihole microcatheter in three cases of acute hand ischaemia in comparison with the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three men (mean age 39 years) with symptoms and signs of acute hand ischaemia (i.e. pain, pallor, cyanosis, decreased motor or sensory function) were studied with Doppler ultrasound and selective arteriography, which demonstrated acute clotting of wrist and/or hand arteries. They therefore underwent intra-arterial thrombolysis with the administration of urokinase and vasodilators and heparin if necessary, with (n=2) or without (n=1) multihole microcatheters. RESULTS: In all three cases, partial or complete recanalisation of the occluded arteries was achieved, with almost complete remission of clinical symptoms and good recovery of hand function. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous intra-arterial thrombolysis is an effective therapeutic approach in cases of acute hand ischaemia and is a valid alternative to surgical thrombectomy. Multihole microcatheters allow the thrombolytic agent to be distributed more evenly into the clot and may help to reduce reactive arterial spasm.


Subject(s)
Hand Injuries/complications , Hand/blood supply , Ischemia/drug therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Acute Disease , Adult , Catheterization/methods , Humans , Ischemia/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
3.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 36(3): 324-38, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18564793

ABSTRACT

Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials of selective digestive decontamination have clinical outcome measures, mainly pneumonia and mortality. This meta-analysis has a microbiological endpoint and explores the impact of selective digestive decontamination on Gram-negative and Gram-positive carriage and severe infections. We searched electronic databases, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, previous meta-analyses and conference proceedings with no language restrictions. We included randomised controlled trials which compared the selective digestive decontamination protocol with no treatment or placebo. Three reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed the quality assessment and extracted the data. The outcome measures were carriage and severe infection due to Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Odds ratios were pooled with the random effect model. Fifty-four randomised controlled trials comprising 9473 patients were included; 4672 patients received selective digestive decontamination and 4801 were controls. Selective digestive decontamination significantly reduced oropharyngeal carriage (odds ratio [OR] 0.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07 to 0.23), rectal carriage (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.31), overall infection (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.28), lower respiratory tract infection (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.20) and bloodstream infection (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.67) due to Gram-negative bacteria. Reduction in Gram-positive carriage was not significant. Gram-positive lower airway infections were significantly reduced (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.78). Gram-positive bloodstream infections were not significantly increased (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.41). The association of parenteral and enteral antimicrobials was superior to enteral antimicrobials in reducing carriage and severe infections due to Gram-negative bacteria. This meta-analysis confirms that selective digestive decontamination mainly targets Gram-negative bacteria; it does not show a significant increase in Gram-positive infection.


Subject(s)
Digestive System/microbiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Critical Care , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Humans , Odds Ratio , Publication Bias , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
4.
Radiol Med ; 111(1): 61-72, 2006 Feb.
Article in English, Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16623306

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of angiosonography in comparison with colour Doppler ultrasound (US) in the discrimination of suspicious breast lesions with nondiagnostic fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-operative Power Doppler US and angiosonography were prospectively performed in 20 suspicious breast lesions with non-diagnostic FNAC. A second-generation US contrast agent was utilised with a high-frequency transducer and a contrast-specific algorithm (low acoustic pressure CnTI). The enhancement characteristics of all lesions were analysed using qualitative and quantitative parameters obtained from time-intensity curves with the different imaging modalities. The final diagnosis was confirmed at pathology in all cases. Microvessel density (MVD) was assessed in the surgical specimen using CD34. RESULTS: The correct assessment of biological behaviour was achieved in all cases by angiosonography (sensitivity of 100%; specificity of 91%) and colour Doppler US (45% sensitivity; 78% specificity). MVD correlated with the biological behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Angiosonography is more accurate than colour Doppler US in the correct assessment of biological behaviour of suspicious breast lesions.


Subject(s)
Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/blood supply , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Contrast Media , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neovascularization, Pathologic , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...