Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dev Neurobiol ; 83(7-8): 237-254, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37679904

ABSTRACT

The adult brain is made up of anatomically and functionally distinct regions with specific neuronal compositions. At the root of this neuronal diversity are neural stem and progenitor cells (NPCs) that produce many neurons throughout embryonic development. During development, NPCs switch from initial expanding divisions to neurogenic divisions, which marks the onset of neurogenesis. Here, we aimed to understand when NPCs switch division modes to generate the first neurons in the anterior-most part of the zebrafish brain, the telencephalon. To this end, we used the deep learning-based segmentation method Cellpose and clonal analysis of individual NPCs to assess the production of neurons by NPCs in the first 24 h of zebrafish telencephalon development. Our results provide a quantitative atlas detailing the production of telencephalic neurons and NPC division modes between 14 and 24 h postfertilization. We find that within this timeframe, the switch to neurogenesis is gradual, with considerable heterogeneity in individual NPC neurogenic potential and division rates. This quantitative characterization of initial neurogenesis in the zebrafish telencephalon establishes a basis for future studies aimed at illuminating the molecular mechanisms and regulators of early neurogenesis.


Quantification of neuron production and neural progenitor division modes in zebrafish embryonic telencephalon up to 24 h postfertilization using deep learning-based segmentation and clonal analysis methods.


Subject(s)
Neural Stem Cells , Zebrafish , Animals , Neurogenesis/physiology , Neurons , Telencephalon
2.
Front Cell Dev Biol ; 10: 885269, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35693936

ABSTRACT

Robust brain development requires the tight coordination between tissue growth, neuronal differentiation and stem cell maintenance. To achieve this, neural stem cells need to balance symmetric proliferative and terminal divisions with asymmetric divisions. In recent years, the unequal distribution of certain cellular components in mitosis has emerged as a key mechanism to regulate the symmetry of division, and the determination of equal and unequal sister cell fates. Examples of such components include polarity proteins, signaling components, and cellular structures such as endosomes and centrosomes. In several types of neural stem cells, these factors show specific patterns of inheritance that correlate to specific cell fates, albeit the underlying mechanism and the potential causal relationship is not always understood. Here, we review these examples of cellular neural stem and progenitor cell asymmetries and will discuss how they fit into our current understanding of neural stem cell function in neurogenesis in developing and adult brains. We will focus mainly on the vertebrate brain, though we will incorporate relevant examples from invertebrate organisms as well. In particular, we will highlight recent advances in our understanding of the complexities related cellular asymmetries in determining division mode outcomes, and how these mechanisms are spatiotemporally regulated to match the different needs for proliferation and differentiation as the brain forms.

3.
J Mol Biol ; 430(10): 1531-1543, 2018 05 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29555554

ABSTRACT

Activation of estrogen receptor α (ERα) stimulates cell division and tumor growth by modulating the expression of ERα target genes. This activation involves the recruitment of specific proteins with activities that are still not fully understood. Timeless, the human homolog of the Drosophila gene involved in circadian rhythm, was previously shown to be a strong predictor of tamoxifen relapse, and is involved in genomic stability and cell cycle control. In this study, we investigated the interplay between Timeless and ERα, and showed that human Timeless is an ERα coactivator. Timeless binds to ERα and enhances its transcriptional activity. Overexpressing Timeless increases PARP1 expression and enhances ERα-induced gene regulation through the proximal LXXLL motif on Timeless protein and ERα PARylation. Finally, Timeless is recruited with ERα on the GREB1 and cMyc promoters. These data, the first to link Timeless to steroid hormone function, provide a mechanistic basis for its clinical association with tamoxifen resistance. Thus, our results identify Timeless as another key regulator of ERα in controlling ERα transactivation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Estrogen Receptor alpha/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Transcriptional Activation , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Proliferation , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , HEK293 Cells , Humans , MCF-7 Cells , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1/genetics , Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1/metabolism , Prognosis , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc/genetics , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...