Three-D-printed simulator for kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Three-Dimensional (3D) printing technology can be used to manufacture training platforms for surgeons. Kidney transplantation offers a suitable model, since it mostly entails vascular and ureteric anastomoses. METHODS: A new simulation platform for surgical training in kidney transplantation was realized and validated in this study. A combination of different 3-D printing technology was used to reproduce the key anatomy of lower abdomen, of pelvis, and of a kidney graft, including their mechanical properties. RESULTS: Thirty transplantations were performed by two junior trainees with no previous experience in the area. Analysis of the times required to perform the simulated transplantation showed that proficiency was reached after about ten cases, as indicated by a flattening of the respective curves that corresponded to a shortening of about 40% and 47%, respectively, of the total time initially needed to perform the whole simulated transplantation. Although an objective assessment of the technical quality of the anastomoses failed to show a significant improvement throughout the study, a growth in self-confidence with the procedure was reported by both trainees. CONCLUSION: The quality of the presented simulation platform aimed at reproducing in the highest possible way a realistic model of the operative setting and proved effective in providing an integrated training environment where technical skills are enhanced together with a team-training experience. As a result the trainees' self-confidence with the procedure resulted enforced. Three-D--printed models can also offer pre-operative patient-specific training when anatomical variants are anticipated by medical imaging. An analysis of the costs related to the use of this platform is also provided and discussed.

One-step intraoperative radiotherapy optimizes conservative treatment of breast cancer with advantages in quality of life and work resumption.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) could be not-inferior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in selected patients, but toxicities, self-perception of body image, quality of life, and resumption of work or daily activities have been poorly explored. The aim of the present study was to compare these outcomes between EBRT, IORT full-dose (IORT-f) and IORT boost (IORT-b). METHODS: 443 consecutive patients, candidates for breast-conserving surgery, were included: EBRT was performed in 220 patients (49.7%), IORT-f in 140 patients (31.6%), and IORT-b in 83 patients (18.7%). Radiotherapy-related toxicities were registered. Patients were evaluated at 6 months for Body Image after Breast Cancer Questionnaire (BIBCQ) to assess possible changes in self-perception of body image and limitations. A second questionnaire explored the impact of EBRT, IORT-f and IORT-b on resumption of work and normal daily activities. RESULTS: EBRT had a higher risk of breast fibrosis and retraction (OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.024-12.526, p = 0.046) and breast edema (OR 6, 95% CI 2.077-17.335, p = 0.001) compared to IORT-f, but a lower risk of seroma compared to IORT-b (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.166-0.785, p = 0.01). The BIBCQ scores showed a better outcome in arm concerns with IORT-f (-3.3) vs. IORT-b (-1.3, p = 0.002) and EBRT (-1.7, p = 0.006), although biased by the lower rate in axillary dissections. Return to daily activities occurred after 70.6 days with EBRT vs. 41 days with IORT-f (p < 0.0001) and 53.3 days with IORT-b (p = 0.07), without any effect of age or axillary dissection. CONCLUSION: IORT could reduce adverse effects, allowing faster resumption of job and houseworks.