Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acta Biomed ; 94(2): e2023046, 2023 04 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37092621

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hip fracture is a major traumatic event with high mortality and disability rate. Its management in the acute setting and in the rehabilitation process is highly debated. This study evaluates the possible determinants of hip fracture rehabilitation outcome, among which surgical intervention type, weight-bearing status and hospitalization length Methods: The data of 738 hip fracture patients, who completed rehabilitation process in our centre, were collected and patients' functional abilities at the time of admission and discharge were analysed. RESULTS: It has been observed that functional recovery depends on several factors: the type of surgery, the post-operative course and related complications, the hospitalisation time, the surgeon's techniques and expertise and the Orthopaedics centre where the operation is performed. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, data integration in perspective of an individualised rehabilitation program appears crucial for the functional recovery of the hip fracture patient.


Subject(s)
Hip Fractures , Humans , Aged , Hospitalization , Treatment Outcome , Patient Discharge , Activities of Daily Living
2.
Acta Biomed ; 92(6): e2021387, 2022 01 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35075082

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In an old or very older adult, frailty is a common geriatric syndrome resulting from aging-associated decline including loss of autonomy related to multiple pathologies. AIM: The study aims to evaluate the frailty affects on functional and rehabilitative recovery of the elderly patient. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study of subjects over 65 years old who underwent hip surgery following a traumatic femoral fracture. SETTING: Patients admitted to intensive rehabilitation department after hip fracture event. POPULATION: The sudy include records of 350 patients over-65-year-old with hip fracture treated in hospital with surgery. METHODS: Patients enrolled were classified into three groups: youngest-old, ages 65 to 74 years; middle-old, 75 to 84 years; and oldest-old, ≥85 years. Each patient underwent a multidimensional evaluation capable of identifying the deficient domains, defining the presence of frailty, and the different degrees of severity. All patients underwent a project and rehabilitation program according to the literature protocol. RESULTS: The average age of the enrolled patients was 73.2 ± 5.6, 38.6% were over 75 years of age, mostly females (58.9%). The prevalence of frailty increased with age, and cognitive functions were associated with both the frailty measured with the Rockwood and Lacks scales. The recovery of Barthel and Tinetti scores correlates to the level of fragility. CONCLUSION: The approach based on the diagnosis and treatment of the individual disease should be radically changed to a culture and an assessment capacity of elderly persons that take into account the indicators which characterize it as comorbidity, psychological, cultural factors, and environmental health status. Frailty is the sum of these conditions, and it is the most impacting variable in the recovery of autonomy. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The approach based on the diagnosis and treatment of the individual disease should include comorbidity, psychological condition, cultural factors, and environmental health status.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Hip Fractures , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Frailty/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Male , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies
3.
Eur Spine J ; 30(8): 2091-2101, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34106349

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) Studies have estimated that low back pain is one of the costliest ailments worldwide. Subsequent to GBD publications, leadership of the four largest global spine societies agreed to form SPINE20. This article introduces the concept of SPINE20, the recommendations, and the future of this global advocacy group linked to G20 annual summits. METHODS: The founders of SPINE20 advocacy group coordinated with G20 Saudi Arabia to conduct the SPINE20 summit in 2020. The summit was intended to promote evidence-based recommendations to use the most reliable information from high-level research. Eight areas of importance to mitigate spine disorders were identified through a voting process of the participating societies. Twelve recommendations were discussed and vetted. RESULTS: The areas of immediate concern were "Aging spine," "Future of spine care," "Spinal cord injuries," "Children and adolescent spine," "Spine-related disability," "Spine Educational Standards," "Patient safety," and "Burden on economy." Twelve recommendations were created and endorsed by 31/33 spine societies and 2 journals globally during a vetted process through the SPINE20.org website and during the virtual inaugural meeting November 10-11, 2020 held from the G20 platform. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time that international spine societies have joined to support actions to mitigate the burden of spine disorders across the globe. SPINE20 seeks to change awareness and treatment of spine pain by supporting local projects that implement value-based practices with healthcare policies that are culturally sensitive based on scientific evidence.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons , Low Back Pain , Spinal Diseases , Adolescent , Child , Global Burden of Disease , Humans , Spine
4.
Acta Biomed ; 90(3): 385-393, 2019 09 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31580331

ABSTRACT

Background and aims of the work: Hip fracture is a dramatic event especially in the elderly and the return to the pre-fracture functional and social state is often difficult to achieve. In the post-acute, the intensive rehabilitation period aims to recover as much autonomy as possible to these patients, but not always its duration is sufficient to ensure an effective and lasting result in returning home, hence the need for additional rehabilitation services. Our aim was to evaluate the use of additional rehabilitation services by patients who underwent hip fracture after an intensive rehabilitation treatment period performed at our hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. We involved patients aged 45 years and older, admitted at our intensive rehabilitation, who joined a rehabilitation program for a hip fracture. RESULTS: Our results showed how the use of further physiotherapy is associated with the type of surgical intervention and with higher Cumulative Illness Rating Scale CIRS scores. Similarly, the loss of autonomy is associated with the type of intervention, the increase in CIRS and the duration of the physiotherapy, and negatively associated with the duration of each session. The re-hospitalizations for each cause is positively associated with CIRS and negatively associated with the further use of physiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our conclusion is that rehabilitation needs a personalized schedule, because the real discriminating factor in the management of frail patients should therefore be the quality, and not the quantity (i.e. longer session), of the rehabilitative intervention prescribed.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care , Hip Fractures/rehabilitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hip Fractures/mortality , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Therapy Modalities , Retrospective Studies
5.
Rehabil Nurs ; 43(5): 267-274, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30168809

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this investigation was to assess resilience within an elderly population during postacute rehabilitation for orthopedic surgery and to identify the role of resilience on rehabilitation outcomes by comparing hip fracture and elective patients (total knee and hip arthroplasty). DESIGN: We conducted a prospective study in an orthopedic rehabilitation department. METHODS: On admission and on discharge, 80 patients aged over 60 years underwent a multidimensional evaluation with the Resilience Scale, the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Multidimensional Prognostic Index, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF. FINDINGS: Hip-fractured patients had a lower level of resilience. High-resilient fracture patients achieved higher FIM scores. For elective patients, no differences on FIM score occurred for different resilience levels. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Resilience plays a significant role in reaching optimal functional recovery in hip-fractured elderly people. Results suggest the introduction of early routine assessment of resilience in future outcome studies in rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Orthopedic Procedures/rehabilitation , Resilience, Psychological , Adaptation, Psychological , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Elective Surgical Procedures/psychology , Elective Surgical Procedures/rehabilitation , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Orthopedic Procedures/psychology , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Recovery of Function
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...