Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Gerontologist ; 64(6)2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666718

ABSTRACT

Falls are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among adults aged 65 years and older (older adults) and are increasingly recognized as a chronic condition. Yet, fall-related care is infrequently provided in a chronic care context despite fall-related death rates increasing by 41% between 2012 and 2021. One of the many challenges to addressing falls is the absence of fall-focused chronic disease management programs, which improve outcomes of other chronic conditions, like diabetes. Policies, information systems, and clinical-community connections help form the backbone of chronic disease management programs, yet these elements are often missing in fall prevention. Reframing fall prevention through the Expanded Chronic Care Model (ECCM) guided by implementation science to simultaneously support the uptake of evidence-based practices could help improve the care of older adults at risk for falling. The ECCM includes seven components: (1) self-management/develop personal skills, (2) decision support, (3) delivery system design/re-orient health services, (4) information systems, (5) build healthy public policy, (6) create supportive environments, and (7) strengthen community action. Applying the ECCM to falls-related care by integrating health care delivery system changes, community resources, and public policies to support patient-centered engagement for self-management offers the potential to prevent falls more effectively among older adults.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Humans , Aged , Chronic Disease/prevention & control , Risk Management/methods , Public Health
2.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 72(6): 1669-1686, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38131656

ABSTRACT

Falls are a major cause of preventable death, injury, and reduced independence in adults aged 65 years and older. The American Geriatrics Society and British Geriatrics Society (AGS/BGS) published a guideline in 2001, revised in 2011, addressing common risk factors for falls and providing recommendations to reduce fall risk in community-dwelling older adults. In 2022, the World Falls Guidelines (WFG) Task Force created updated, globally oriented fall prevention risk stratification, assessment, management, and interventions for older adults. Our objective was to briefly summarize the new WFG, compare them to the AGS/BGS guideline, and offer suggestions for implementation in the United States. We reviewed 11 of the 12 WFG topics related to community-dwelling older adults and agree with several additions to the prior AGS/BGS guideline, including assessment and intervention for hearing impairment and concern for falling, assessment and individualized exercises for older adults with cognitive impairment, and performing a standardized assessment such as STOPPFall before prescribing a medication that could potentially increase fall risk. Notable areas of difference include: (1) AGS continues to recommend screening all patients aged 65+ annually for falls, rather than just those with a history of falls or through opportunistic case finding; (2) AGS recommends continued use of the Timed Up and Go as a gait assessment, rather than relying on gait speed; and (3) AGS recommends clinical judgment on whether or not to check an ECG for those at risk for falling. Our review and translation of the WFG for a US audience offers guidance for healthcare and other providers and teams to reduce fall risk in older adults.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Geriatric Assessment , Geriatrics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Humans , Aged , United States , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment , Societies, Medical , Independent Living , Aged, 80 and over , Risk Factors , Female , Male
3.
Water Res ; 188: 116534, 2021 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33125992

ABSTRACT

Humans and animals are frequently exposed to PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) through drinking water and food; however, no therapeutic sorbent strategies have been developed to mitigate this problem. Montmorillonites amended with the common nutrients, carnitine and choline, were characterized for their ability to bind 4 representative PFAS (PFOA, PFOS, GenX, and PFBS). Adsorption/desorption isothermal analysis showed that PFOA, PFOS (and a mixture of the two) fit the Langmuir model with high binding capacity, affinity and enthalpy at conditions simulating the stomach. A low percentage of desorption occurred at conditions simulating the intestine. The results suggested that hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonding were responsible for sequestering PFAS into clay interlayers. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations suggested the key mode of interaction of PFAS was through fluorinated carbon chains, and confirmed that PFOA and PFOS had enhanced binding to amended clays compared to GenX and PFBS. The safety and efficacy of amended montmorillonite clays were confirmed in Hydra vulgaris, where a mixture of amended sorbents delivered the highest protection against a PFAS mixture. These important results suggest that the inclusion of edible, nutrient-amended clays with optimal affinity, capacity, and enthalpy can be used to decrease the bioavailability of PFAS from contaminated drinking water and diets.


Subject(s)
Bentonite , Fluorocarbons , Adsorption , Animals , Clay , Humans , Nutrients
4.
Med Clin North Am ; 104(5): 791-806, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773046

ABSTRACT

A large body of research has addressed the assessment and management of fall risk among community-dwelling older adults. Persons with dementia are at higher risk for falls and fall-related injuries, yet less is known about effective strategies for reducing falls and injuries among those with dementia. Falls and dementia are regularly considered to be discrete conditions and are often managed separately. Increasing evidence shows that these conditions frequently co-occur, and one may precede the other. This article explores the relationship between falls and dementia, including the importance of rehabilitation strategies for reducing fall risk in these individuals.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Dementia , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Causality , Dementia/diagnosis , Dementia/epidemiology , Humans , Independent Living/psychology , Primary Health Care/methods
5.
Innov Aging ; 1(2): igx028, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29955671

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Falls are the leading cause of injury-related deaths in older adults. Objectives include describing implementation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative to help primary care providers (PCPs) identify and manage fall risk, and comparing a 12-item and a 3-item fall screening questionnaire. DESIGN AND METHODS: We systematically incorporated STEADI into routine patient care via team training, electronic health record tools, and tailored clinic workflow. A retrospective chart review of patients aged 65 and older who received STEADI measured fall screening rates, provider compliance with STEADI (high-risk patients), results from the 12-item questionnaire (Stay Independent), and comparison with a 3-item subset of this questionnaire (three key questions). RESULTS: Eighteen of 24 providers (75%) participated, screening 773 (64%) patients over 6 months; 170 (22%) were high-risk. Of these, 109 (64%) received STEADI interventions (gait, vision, and feet assessment, orthostatic blood pressure measurement, vitamin D, and medication review). Providers intervened on 85% with gait impairment, 97% with orthostatic hypotension, 82% with vision impairment, 90% taking inadequate vitamin D, 75% with foot issues, and 22% on high-risk medications. Using three key questions compared to the full Stay Independent questionnaire decreased screening burden, but increased the number of high-risk patients. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: We successfully implemented STEADI, screening two-thirds of eligible patients. Most high-risk patients received recommended assessments and interventions, except medication reduction. Falls remain a substantial public health challenge. Systematic implementation of STEADI could help clinical teams reduce older patient fall risks.

6.
Gerontologist ; 57(4): 787-796, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27130270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Falls lead to a disproportionate burden of death and disability among older adults despite evidence-based recommendations to screen regularly for fall risk and clinical trials demonstrating the effectiveness of multifactorial interventions to reduce falls. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries) to assist primary care teams to screen for fall risk and reduce risk of falling in older adults. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This paper describes a practical application of STEADI in a large academic internal medicine clinic utilizing the Kotter framework, a tool used to guide clinical practice change. DESIGN AND METHODS: We describe key steps and decision points in the implementation of STEADI as they relate to the recommended strategies of the Kotter framework. Strategies include: creating a sense of urgency, building a guiding coalition, forming a strategic vision and initiative, enlisting volunteers, enabling success by removing barriers, generating short-term wins, sustaining change, and instituting change. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were screened during pilot testing; 360 patients were screened during the first 3 months of implementation. Key to successful implementation was (a) the development of electronic health record (EHR) tools and workflow to guide clinical practice and (b) the proactive leadership of clinical champions within the practice to identify and respond to barriers. IMPLICATIONS: Implementing falls prevention in a clinical setting required support and effort across multiple stakeholders. We highlight challenges, successes, and lessons learned that offer guidance for other clinical practices in their falls prevention efforts.

7.
8.
Front Public Health ; 4: 190, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27660753

ABSTRACT

A multifactorial approach to assess and manage modifiable risk factors is recommended for older adults with a history of falls. Limited research suggests that this approach does not routinely occur in clinical practice, but most related studies are based on provider self-report, with the last chart audit of United States practice published over a decade ago. We conducted a retrospective chart review to assess the extent to which patients aged 65+ years with a history of repeated falls or fall-related health-care use received multifactorial risk assessment and interventions. The setting was an academic primary care clinic in the Pacific Northwest. Among the 116 patients meeting our inclusion criteria, 48% had some type of documented assessment. Their mean age was 79 ± 8 years; 68% were female, and 10% were non-white. They averaged six primary care visits over a 12-month period subsequent to their index fall. Frequency of assessment of fall-risk factors varied from 24% (for home safety) to 78% (for vitamin D). An evidence-based intervention was recommended for identified risk factors 73% of the time, on average. Two risk factors were addressed infrequently: medications (21%) and home safety (24%). Use of a structured visit note template independently predicted assessment of fall-risk factors (p = 0.003). Geriatrics specialists were more likely to use a structured note template (p = 0.04) and perform more fall-risk factor assessments (4.6 vs. 3.6, p = 0.007) than general internists. These results suggest opportunities for improving multifactorial fall-risk assessment and management of older adults at high fall risk in primary care. A structured visit note template facilitates assessment. Given that high-risk medications have been found to be independent risk factors for falls, increasing attention to medications should become a key focus of both public health educational efforts and fall prevention in primary care practice.

9.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 64(8): 1701-7, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27467774

ABSTRACT

Falls are the leading cause of accidental deaths in older adults and are a growing public health concern. The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) and British Geriatrics Society (BGS) published guidelines for falls screening and risk reduction, yet few primary care providers report following any guidelines for falls prevention. This article describes a project that engaged an interprofessional teaching team to support interprofessional clinical teams to reduce fall risk in older adults by implementing the AGS/BGS guidelines. Twenty-five interprofessional clinical teams with representatives from medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and social work were recruited from ambulatory, long-term care, hospital, and home health settings for a structured intervention: a 4-hour training workshop plus coaching for implementation for 1 year. The workshop focused on evidence-based strategies to decrease the risk of falls, including screening for falls; assessing gait, balance, orthostatic blood pressure, and other medical conditions; exercise including tai chi; vitamin D supplementation; medication review and reduction; and environmental assessment. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using chart reviews, coaching plans and field notes, and postintervention structured interviews of participants. Site visits and coaching field notes confirmed uptake of the strategies. Chart reviews showed significant improvement in adoption of all falls prevention strategies except vitamin D supplementation. Long-term care facilities were more likely to address environmental concerns and add tai chi classes, and ambulatory settings were more likely to initiate falls screening. The intervention demonstrated that interprofessional practice change to target falls prevention can be incorporated into primary care and long-term care settings.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Guideline Adherence/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Humans , Inservice Training/organization & administration , Long-Term Care/organization & administration , Male , Oregon , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Risk Assessment/organization & administration
10.
Gerontologist ; 55 Suppl 1: S128-39, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26055773

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Evaluating driving safety of older adults is an important health topic, but primary care providers (PCP) face multiple barriers in addressing this issue. The study's objectives were to develop an electronic health record (EHR)-based Driving Clinical Support Tool, train PCPs to perform driving assessments utilizing the tool, and systematize documentation of assessment and management of driving safety issues via the tool. DESIGN AND METHODS: The intervention included development of an evidence-based Driving Clinical Support Tool within the EHR, followed by training of internal medicine providers in the tool's content and use. Pre- and postintervention provider surveys and chart review of driving-related patient visits were conducted. Surveys included self-report of preparedness and knowledge to evaluate at-risk older drivers and were analyzed using paired t-test. A chart review of driving-related office visits compared documentation pre- and postintervention including: completeness of appropriate focused history and exam, identification of deficits, patient education, and reporting to appropriate authorities when indicated. RESULTS: Data from 86 providers were analyzed. Pre- and postintervention surveys showed significantly increased self-assessed preparedness (p < .001) and increased driving-related knowledge (p < .001). Postintervention charts showed improved documentation of correct cognitive testing, more referrals/consults, increased patient education about community resources, and appropriate regulatory reporting when deficits were identified. IMPLICATIONS: Focused training and an EHR-based clinical support tool improved provider self-reported preparedness and knowledge of how to evaluate at-risk older drivers. The tool improved documentation of driving-related issues and led to improved access to interdisciplinary care coordination.


Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Electronic Health Records/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/methods , Quality Improvement , Adult , Aged , Decision Support Techniques , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Male , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Research Design , Risk Assessment
11.
Geriatr Nurs ; 35(2 Suppl): S3-10, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24702717

ABSTRACT

Older adults often experience functional losses during hospitalization. Clinical care activities have been increasingly promoted as a way to help older hospitalized patients offset these losses and recover from acute illness. Little research exists to objectively measure clinical care activities. This study evaluated the utility and feasibility of using the Actiheart, a combined heart rate monitor and accelerometer, to measure heart rate and motion (activity counts) during five clinical care activities. Fifty-four adults, aged 65 and older, scheduled for surgery, participated in a simulation of activities. The Actiheart successfully measured motion and heart rate during each of the five activities. One-way repeated measures analyses of variance showed that the Actiheart discriminated significant differences within and across the five activities. This study supports the use of an activity monitor to quantify clinical care activities in research studies that can be translated into clinical care. However, the complexity associated with data collection and analysis using the Actiheart could limit its direct use in clinical research.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Inpatients , Motor Activity , Rehabilitation , Aged , Heart Rate , Humans , Movement
12.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 39(8): 12-25; quiz 26-7, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23758116

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to review relevant literature on activity of older critically ill patients, including activity interventions conducted in this population, with a focus on activity measurement and technology. Literature published between 1996 and 2012 was reviewed using keywords older adults, inactivity, mobility, progressive mobility, rehabilitation, ambulation, early mobilization, ICU (intensive care unit), and accelerometry using CINAHL, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Previous relevant research is discussed and includes intervention and nonintervention studies. Although studies have demonstrated the benefits of early mobilization in the ICU setting, this research has not focused on the high-risk older adult ICU population, nor has it addressed how best to quantify these clinical activities. Current technologies, such as accelerometry, may assist in measuring patient activity and in mobilizing high-risk patients during acute, critical illness.


Subject(s)
Inpatients , Intensive Care Units , Aged , Education, Continuing , Humans
13.
AACN Adv Crit Care ; 22(2): 150-60, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21521957

ABSTRACT

Increasing numbers of older adults are cared for in intensive care units (ICUs) across the country. These patients are disproportionately impacted by illnesses such as sepsis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and infections. Their care and course of recovery are complicated by myriad factors, including their often-indistinct presentation of illness and issues related to pharmacotherapy. Increasingly, clinical practice guidelines are being used to facilitate the care of patients with select illnesses and presentations. However, these guidelines, protocols, or bundles, as they are known, generally have not been studied in an older population. This article describes the ventilator-associated pneumonia and sepsis bundles relative to the older critical care patient. Although an exhaustive discussion of every intervention within each bundle as it relates to older ICU patients is beyond the scope of this article, selected bundle parameters are presented, with examples of special considerations for the older ICU patient.


Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols/standards , Intensive Care Units , Aged , Comprehensive Health Care , Drug Therapy , Humans , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/prevention & control , Sepsis/epidemiology , Sepsis/therapy
14.
J Gerontol Nurs ; 36(7): 27-35; quiz 36-7, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20608589

ABSTRACT

Facilitating students' knowledge and ability to care for critically ill older adults is a daunting task for even the most experienced teacher. Faculty, preceptors, and mentors must address the seemingly dichotomous objectives of training practitioners capable of providing safe, technologically advanced care intended to restore hemodynamic stability tempered by the simultaneous goal of providing person-centered, culturally competent, age-appropriate interventions. This article provides specific approaches to prepare baccalaureate nursing students for some of the challenges experienced when caring for critically ill older adults, including teaching strategies, clinical competency behaviors/activities, and postconference topics. By creating a safe environment for asking questions, sharing their expertise and experiences, and adequately addressing individual learning styles, teachers can begin to instill the passion, commitment, and knowledge needed to care for this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
Critical Illness/nursing , Geriatric Nursing , Aged , Delirium/prevention & control , Geriatric Nursing/education , Humans , Nursing Assessment , Pain/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Terminal Care , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...