Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Rheumatol ; 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825357

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the quality and timeliness of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure reporting, which have not been previously studied. METHODS: Clinical trials that informed new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for the first rheumatological indication between 1995 and 2021 were identified. Data were recorded to determine whether collected PROs were published, met minimum clinically important difference (MCID) or statistical significance (P < 0.05) thresholds, and were consistent with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)-PRO standards. Hazard ratios and Kaplan-Meier estimate were used to assess the time from FDA approval to PRO publication. RESULTS: Thirty-one FDA approvals corresponded with 110 pivotal trials and 262 reported PROs. Of the 90 included studies, 1 (1.1%) met all 5 recommended items, 10 (11.1%) met 4 items, 17 (18.9%) met 3 items, 21 (23.3%) met 2 items, 26 (28.9%) met 1 item, and 15 (16.7%) met none of the reporting standards. Most PROs met MCID thresholds (149/262; 56.9%) and were statistically significant (223/262; 85.1%). Of our subset analysis, one-third of PROs were not published upfront (70/212; 33%) and 1 of 9 (22/212; 10.4%) remained unpublished ≥ 4 years after initial trial reporting. Publication rates were highest for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (97.4%) and lowest for the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (81.8%). Less than half of these published PROs met MCID and statistical significance thresholds (94/212; 44.3%). CONCLUSION: One in 9 PROs remained unpublished for ≥ 4 years after initial trial reporting, and compliance with CONSORT-PRO reporting guidelines was poor. Efforts should be made to ensure PROs are adequately reported and expeditiously published.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570894

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Neuroinflammatory adverse events have been observed among new users of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. No studies to date have compared the real-world risk of TNFs with other new users of biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). The objective of this study is to describe the risk of neuroinflammatory disease after initiation b/tsDMARDs. METHODS: This new user comparative effectiveness cohort study used a large US-based electronic health records database to describe the unadjusted incidence of neuroinflammatory adverse events over a 3-year period. The cohort included patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis initiating treatment with a TNF inhibitor (n = 93,661) or other b/tsDMARD (n = 38,354). RESULTS: Among 132,015 patients included in the analysis, the most common first biologic agent was a TNF inhibitor; the unadjusted incidence of neuroinflammatory events was numerically lower among new users of TNF inhibitors (incidence 1.34 per 1,000 patient-years) as compared with the combined non-TNF group (1.69 per 1,000 patient-years). There was no significant association between TNF exposure and neuroinflammatory events as compared with the combined non-TNF b/tsDMARDs overall (hazard ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 0.75-1.36) and within each disease group. CONCLUSION: The overall risk of neuroinflammatory events among new users of TNF inhibitors did not differ substantially as compared with new users of other b/tsDMARDs. Meta-analyses of randomized trials should be conducted to corroborate these findings, which may be affected by channeling bias.

3.
Inorg Chem ; 61(42): 16664-16677, 2022 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36206536

ABSTRACT

A series of mononuclear Co(II) complexes with noninnocent (redox-active) ligands are prepared that exhibit metal-ligand cooperativity during the reversible binding of O2. The complexes have the general formula, [CoII(LS,N)(TpR2)] (R = Me, Ph), where LS,N is a bidentate o-aminothiophenolate and TpR2 is a hydrotris(pyrazol-1-yl)borate scorpionate with R-substituents at the 3- and 5-positions. Exposure to O2 at room temperature results in one-electron oxidation and deprotonation of LS,N. The oxidized derivatives possess substantial "singlet diradical" character arising from antiferromagnetic coupling between an iminothiosemiquinonate (ITSQ•-) ligand radical and a low-spin Co(II) ion. The [CoII(TpMe2)(X2ITSQ)] complexes, where X = H or tBu, coordinate O2 reversibly at reduced temperatures to provide Co/O2 adducts. The O2 binding reactions closely resemble those previously reported by our group (Kumar et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019,141, 10984-10987) for the related complexes [CoII(TpMe2)(tBu2SQ)] and [CoII(TpMe2)(tBu2ISQ)], where tBu2(I)SQ represents 4,6-di-tert-butyl-(2-imino)semiquinonate radicals. In each case, the oxygenation reaction proceeds via the addition of O2 to both the cobalt ion and the ligand radical, generating metallocyclic cobalt(III)-alkylperoxo structures. Thermodynamic measurements elucidate the relationship between O2 affinity and redox potentials of the (imino)(thio)semiquinonate radicals, as well as energetic differences between these reactions and conventional metal-based oxygenations. The results highlight the utility and versatility of noninnocent ligands in the design of O2-absorbing compounds.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...