Identifying Early-Phase Clinical Trial Participants at Risk for Experiencing Worse Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To identify early-phase clinical trial (EP-CT) participants at risk for experiencing worse clinical outcomes and describe receipt of supportive care services. METHODS: A retrospective review of the electronic health records of consecutive patients enrolled in EP-CTs from 2017 to 2019 examined baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and receipt of supportive care services. The validated Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognosis score was calculated using data at the time of EP-CT enrollment (scores range from 0 to 3; scores ≥ 2 indicate poor prognosis). Differences in patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and receipt of supportive care services were compared on the basis of RMH scores. RESULTS: Among 350 patients (median age = 63.2 years [range, 23.0-84.3 years], 57.1% female, 98.0% metastatic cancer), 31.7% had an RMH score indicating a poor prognosis. Those with poor prognosis RMH scores had worse overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.00; P < .001), shorter time on trial (HR, 1.53; P < .001), and lower likelihood of completing the dose-limiting toxicity period (odds ratio, 0.42; P = .006) versus those with good prognosis scores. Patients with poor prognosis scores had greater risk of emergency room visits (HR, 1.66; P = .037) and hospitalizations (HR, 1.69; P = .016) while on trial, and earlier hospice enrollment (HR, 2.22; P = .006). Patients with poor prognosis scores were significantly more likely to receive palliative care consultation (46.8% v 27.6%; P < .001), but not other supportive care services. CONCLUSION: This study found that RMH prognosis score could identify patients at risk for decreased survival, shorter time on trial, and greater use of health care services. The findings underscore the need to develop supportive care interventions targeting EP-CT participants' distinct needs.

Associations of patient-reported care satisfaction with symptom burden and healthcare use in hospitalized patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients with cancer often experience a high symptom burden, which may impact care satisfaction and healthcare utilization. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with cancer and unplanned hospitalizations from September 2014 to April 2017. Upon admission, we assessed patients' care satisfaction (FAMCARE items: satisfaction with care coordination and speed with which symptoms are treated) and physical (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]) and psychological (Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [PHQ-4]) symptoms. We used regression models to identify factors associated with care satisfaction and associations of satisfaction with symptom burden and hospital length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Among 1,576 participants, most reported being "satisfied"/ "very satisfied" with care coordination (90%) and speed with which symptoms are treated (89%). Older age (coordination: B < 0.01, P = 0.02, speed: B = 0.01, P < 0.01) and admission to a dedicated oncology service (B = 0.20, P < 0.01 for each) were associated with higher satisfaction. Higher satisfaction with care coordination was associated with lower ESAS-physical (B = - 1.28, P < 0.01), ESAS-total (B = - 2.73, P < 0.01), PHQ4-depression (B = - 0.14, P = 0.02), and PHQ4-anxiety (B = - 0.16, P < 0.01) symptoms. Higher satisfaction with speed with which symptoms are treated was associated with lower ESAS-physical (B = - 1.32, P < 0.01), ESAS-total (B = - 2.46, P < 0.01), PHQ4-depression (B = - 0.14, P = 0.01), and PHQ4-anxiety (B = - 0.17, P < 0.01) symptoms. Satisfaction with care coordination (B = - 0.48, P = 0.04) and speed with which symptoms are treated (B = - 0.44, P = 0.04) correlated with shorter LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with cancer report high care satisfaction, which correlates with older age and admission to a dedicated oncology service. Significant associations among higher care satisfaction, lower symptom burden, and shorter hospital LOS highlight the importance of improving symptom management and care coordination in this population.

Randomized trial of a hospice video educational tool for patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers have substantial misperceptions regarding hospice, which contributes to its underuse. METHODS: The authors conducted a single-site randomized trial of a video educational tool versus a verbal description of hospice in 150 hospitalized patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers. Patients without a caregiver were eligible. Intervention participants (75 patients and 18 caregivers) viewed a 6-minute video depicting hospice. Control participants (75 patients and 26 caregivers) received a verbal description identical to the video narrative. The primary outcome was patient preference for hospice. Secondary outcomes included patient and/or caregiver knowledge and perceptions of hospice, and hospice use. RESULTS: Between February 2017 and January 2019, approximately 55.7% of eligible patients (150 of 269 eligible patients) and 44 caregivers were enrolled. After the intervention, there was no difference noted with regard to patients' preferences for hospice (86.7% vs 82.7%; P = .651). Patients in the video group reported greater knowledge regarding hospice (9.0 vs 8.4; P = .049) and were less likely to endorse that hospice is only about death (6.7% vs 21.6%; P = .010). Among deceased patients, those assigned to the intervention were more likely to have used hospice (85.2% vs 63.6%; P = .01) and to have had a longer hospice length of stay (median, 12 days vs 3 days; P < .001). After the intervention, caregivers assigned to view the video were more likely to prefer hospice for their loved ones (94.4% vs 65.4%; P = .031), reported greater knowledge concerning hospice (9.7% vs 8.0%; P = .001), and were less likely to endorse that hospice is only about death (0.0% vs 23.1%; P = .066). CONCLUSIONS: A hospice video did not significantly impact patients' preferences for hospice care. Patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers who were assigned to view the video were more informed regarding hospice and reported more favorable perceptions of hospice. Patients were more likely to use hospice and to have a longer hospice length of stay.

Use of Antidepressant Medications Moderates the Relationship Between Depressive Symptoms and Hospital Length of Stay in Patients with Advanced Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with cancer, depressive symptoms are associated with worse clinical outcomes, including greater health care utilization. As use of antidepressant medications can improve depressive symptoms, we sought to examine relationships among depressive symptoms, antidepressant medications, and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients with advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2014 to May 2016, we prospectively enrolled patients with advanced cancer who had an unplanned hospitalization. We performed chart review to obtain information regarding documented depressive symptoms in the 3 months prior to admission and use of antidepressant medications at the time of admission. We compared differences in hospital LOS by presence or absence of depressive symptoms and used adjusted linear regression to examine if antidepressant medications moderated these outcomes. RESULTS: Of 1,036 patients, 126 (12.2%) had depressive symptoms documented prior to admission, and 288 (27.8%) were taking antidepressant medications at the time of admission. Patients with depressive symptoms experienced longer hospital LOS (7.25 vs. 6.13 days; p = .036). Use of antidepressant medications moderated this relationship; among patients not on antidepressant medications, depressive symptoms were associated with longer hospital LOS (7.88 vs. 6.11 days; p = .025), but among those on antidepressant medications, depressive symptoms were not associated with hospital LOS (6.57 vs. 6.17 days; p = .578). CONCLUSION: Documented depressive symptoms prior to hospital admission were associated with longer hospital LOS. This effect was restricted to patients not on antidepressant medications. Future studies are needed to investigate if use of antidepressant medications decreases LOS for patients hospitalized with advanced cancer and the mechanisms by which this may occur. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study investigated the prevalence of documented depressive symptoms in patients with advanced cancer in the 3 months prior to an unplanned hospitalization and the prevalence of use of antidepressant medications at time of hospital admission. The relationship of these variables with hospital length of stay was also examined, and it was found that documented depressive symptoms were associated with prolonged hospital length of stay. Interestingly, antidepressant medications moderated the relationship between depressive symptoms and hospital length of stay. These findings support the need to recognize and address depressive symptoms among patients with advanced cancer, with potential implications for optimizing health care utilization.

Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder among hospitalized patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer experience many stressors placing them at risk for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, yet little is known about factors associated with PTSD symptoms in this population. This study explored relationships among patients' PTSD symptoms, physical and psychological symptom burden, and risk for hospital readmissions. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients with cancer admitted for an unplanned hospitalization from August 2015-April 2017. Upon admission, we assessed patients' PTSD symptoms (Primary Care PTSD Screen), as well as physical (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]) and psychological (Patient Health Questionnaire 4 [PHQ-4]) symptoms. We examined associations between PTSD symptoms and patients' physical and psychological symptom burden using linear regression. We evaluated relationships between PTSD symptoms and unplanned hospital readmissions within 90-days using Cox regression. RESULTS: We enrolled 954 of 1,087 (87.8%) patients approached, and 127 (13.3%) screened positive for PTSD symptoms. The 90-day hospital readmission rate was 38.9%. Younger age, female sex, greater comorbidities, and genitourinary cancer type were associated with higher PTSD scores. Patients' PTSD symptoms were associated with physical symptoms (ESAS physical: B = 3.41; P < .001), the total symptom burden (ESAS total: B = 5.97; P < .001), depression (PHQ-4 depression: B = 0.67; P < .001), and anxiety symptoms (PHQ-4 anxiety: B = 0.71; P < .001). Patients' PTSD symptoms were associated with a lower risk of hospital readmissions (hazard ratio, 0.81; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of hospitalized patients with cancer experience PTSD symptoms, which are associated with a greater physical and psychological symptom burden and a lower risk of hospital readmissions. Interventions to address patients' PTSD symptoms are needed and should account for their physical and psychological symptom burden. Cancer 2018. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Predictors of Posthospital Transitions of Care in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Purpose Patients with advanced cancer experience potentially burdensome transitions of care after hospitalizations. We examined predictors of discharge location and assessed the relationship between discharge location and survival in this population. Methods We conducted a prospective study of 932 patients with advanced cancer who experienced an unplanned hospitalization between September 2014 and March 2016. Upon admission, we assessed patients' physical symptoms (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System) and psychological distress (Patient Health Questionnaire-4). The primary outcome was discharge location (home without hospice, postacute care [PAC], or hospice [any setting]). The secondary outcome was survival. Results Of 932 patients, 726 (77.9%) were discharged home without hospice, 118 (12.7%) were discharged to PAC, and 88 (9.4%) to hospice. Those discharged to PAC and hospice reported high rates of severe symptoms, including dyspnea, constipation, low appetite, fatigue, depression, and anxiety. Using logistic regression, patients discharged to PAC or hospice versus home without hospice were more likely to be older (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.05; P < .001), live alone (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.02; P < .003), have impaired mobility (OR, 5.08; 95% CI, 3.46 to 7.45; P < .001), longer hospital stays (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.20; P < .001), higher Edmonton Symptom Assessment System physical symptoms (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.003 to 1.032; P < .017), and higher Patient Health Questionnaire-4 depression symptoms (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.25; P < .027). Patients discharged to hospice rather than PAC were more likely to receive palliative care consultation (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 2.12 to 9.29; P < .001) and have shorter hospital stays (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.91; P < .001). Patients discharged to PAC versus home had lower survival (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.93; P < .001). Conclusion Patients with advanced cancer who were discharged to PAC facilities and hospice had substantial physical and psychological symptom burden, impaired physical function, and inferior survival compared with those discharged to home. These patients may benefit from interventions to enhance their quality of life and care.

The relationship between physical and psychological symptoms and health care utilization in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced cancer often experience frequent and prolonged hospitalizations; however, the factors associated with greater health care utilization have not been described. We sought to investigate the relation between patients' physical and psychological symptom burden and health care utilization. METHODS: We enrolled patients with advanced cancer and unplanned hospitalizations from September 2014-May 2016. Upon admission, we assessed physical (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System [ESAS]) and psychological symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire 4 [PHQ-4]). We examined the relationship between symptom burden and healthcare utilization using linear regression for hospital length of stay (LOS) and Cox regression for time to first unplanned readmission within 90 days. We adjusted all models for age, sex, marital status, comorbidity, education, time since advanced cancer diagnosis, and cancer type. RESULTS: We enrolled 1,036 of 1,152 (89.9%) consecutive patients approached. Over one-half reported moderate/severe fatigue, poor well being, drowsiness, pain, and lack of appetite. PHQ-4 scores indicated that 28.8% and 28.0% of patients had depression and anxiety symptoms, respectively. The mean hospital LOS was 6.3 days, and the 90-day readmission rate was 43.1%. Physical symptoms (ESAS: unstandardized coefficient [B], 0.06; P < .001), psychological distress (PHQ-4 total: B, 0.11; P = .040), and depression symptoms (PHQ-4 depression: B, 0.22; P = .017) were associated with longer hospital LOS. Physical (ESAS: hazard ratio, 1.01; P < .001), and anxiety symptoms (PHQ-4 anxiety: hazard ratio, 1.06; P = .045) were associated with a higher likelihood for readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with advanced cancer experience a high symptom burden, which is significantly associated with prolonged hospitalizations and readmissions. Interventions are needed to address the symptom burden of this population to improve health care delivery and utilization. Cancer 2017;123:4720-4727. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Processes of code status transitions in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although hospitalized patients with advanced cancer have a low chance of surviving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the processes by which they change their code status from full code to do not resuscitate (DNR) are unknown. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study on a prospective cohort of hospitalized patients with advanced cancer. Two physicians used a consensus-driven medical record review to characterize processes that led to code status order transitions from full code to DNR. RESULTS: In total, 1047 hospitalizations were reviewed among 728 patients. Admitting clinicians did not address code status in 53% of hospitalizations, resulting in code status orders of "presumed full." In total, 275 patients (26.3%) transitioned from full code to DNR, and 48.7% (134 of 275 patients) of those had an order of "presumed full" at admission; however, upon further clarification, the patients expressed that they had wished to be DNR before the hospitalization. We identified 3 additional processes leading to order transition from full code to DNR acute clinical deterioration (15.3%), discontinuation of cancer-directed therapy (17.1%), and education about the potential harms/futility of CPR (15.3%). Compared with discontinuing therapy and education, transitions because of acute clinical deterioration were associated with less patient involvement (P = .002), a shorter time to death (P < .001), and a greater likelihood of inpatient death (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: One-half of code status order changes among hospitalized patients with advanced cancer were because of full code orders in patients who had a preference for DNR before hospitalization. Transitions due of acute clinical deterioration were associated with less patient engagement and a higher likelihood of inpatient death. Cancer 2017;123:4895-902. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Exemplars of Innovation in Practice: Implications of the AONE-CIT and CMS Innovation Advisors Projects Within the Massachusetts General Hospital.

Innovation in health care requires leaders to influence the development of positive environments that accelerate innovation and produce better outcomes for patients, the workforce, and organizations. Given the multifaceted changes in today's health care system, nursing leaders must utilize opportunities for innovation to focus on enhancing practice environments. In this article, nursing leaders who oversee personnel on direct care delivery units report on how they worked within existing organizational structures to influence improvement in practice environments while accelerating innovation.

Caring for one of our own.

Schwartz Center Rounds are monthly multidisciplinary meetings where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues that they, along with patients and their families, face and gain insight and support from fellow staff members, with the goal of advancing compassionate health care, supporting caregivers, and fostering the connection between a clinician and his or her patients. This Schwartz Round focused on boundaries and the particular privileges and pressures of caring for a member of the staff. The article explores the tension between professional courtesy and empathic engagement. Major transitions can include the intrinsic fear of abandonment. Being "connected" is an important aspect of the patient-caregiver relationship. Patient-centered care requires that we balance clinical acumen and medical technology with humanism throughout the different phases of a patient's experience with a life-threatening illness.

Implementation of 2 nurse practitioner inpatient models.

Opportunities for nurse practitioners in acute care settings are expanding owing to the restricted hours for medical residents. This is coupled with national initiatives to improve the quality of care driven by patients, insurers, and national healthcare organizations that wish to enhance access to healthcare for all Americans. The authors discuss 2 care delivery models that were designed and implemented at Massachusetts General Hospital with nurses acting as full partners in the redesign.

Women's experiences with antiestrogen therapy to treat breast cancer.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To understand the experiences of women undergoing antiestrogen therapy (AET) to treat breast cancer. RESEARCH APPROACH: Content analysis of tape-recorded focus group interviews. SETTING: Breast oncology center of a large medical center in the northeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 21 women undergoing AET to treat breast cancer. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: A nonexperimental qualitative, descriptive design using open-ended interviews and content analysis to isolate themes. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Women's experiences with AET. FINDINGS: Five themes were isolated and were focused on the overall experience of having breast cancer: symptoms related to AET, shared decision making, being strong for others, discovering new priorities, and recognizing vulnerability. CONCLUSIONS: Oral therapies are an increasingly popular treatment option for various types of cancer, particularly in women with estrogen-sensitive breast cancer. Although this type of treatment has been efficacious in terms of disease-free and overall survival, women undergoing AET face many challenges related to treatment. Healthcare providers need to understand women's perceptions of AET and its effects as a first step in the process of developing interventions to improve care. INTERPRETATION: More research is needed to distinguish whether the presence of preexisting chronic illness, differences in type of AET, age, and ethnicity impact the overall experience of women on AET. Individual interviews may be necessary to fully explore the experience. Oncology nurses should implement surveillance care to explore the effects of AET on women with breast cancer.

Parsing depression from fatigue in patients with cancer using the fatigue symptom inventory.

CONTEXT: A central aim in the management of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is to identify treatable causes, such as depression. However, CRF and depression symptoms overlap and frequently co-occur, complicating diagnostic assessment. OBJECTIVES: As cancer-related symptoms have been associated with more functional impairment among patients who are depressed, this study tested the ratio of fatigue interference to fatigue severity as a method for identifying depression cases. Patients who reported that interference was greater than severity were expected to show higher rates of depression as measured by self-report instrument or structured interview. METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted using data from patients who were attending a hospital thoracic oncology clinic and who completed the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Sample 1, n = 86). Analyses were then replicated in a sample of diverse cancer patients who completed the FSI and a structured clinical interview for depression on presentation to a CRF clinic at the same hospital (Sample 2, n = 39). RESULTS: Receiver operating curve analyses supported use of the FSI interference/severity ratio in distinguishing depression cases and noncases (area under the curve: Sample 1 = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.94; Sample 2 = 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-0.99). With sensitivity and specificity weighted equally, the optimal cutoff was ≥ 1.0 in Sample 1 (sensitivity = 62.5%, specificity = 91.4%) and Sample 2 (sensitivity = 90.9%, specificity=85.7%). CONCLUSION: A fatigue score pattern in which interference was greater than or equal to severity predicted depression in two patient samples. This ratio may be useful for brief initial screening of depression in the context of fatigue.

"I feel like I am 100 years old!" managing arthralgias from aromatase inhibitors.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are recommended for the treatment of estrogen-sensitive breast cancer in postmenopausal women and provide a superior risk reduction compared to five years of tamoxifen alone. Arthralgias, a common side effect of AIs, may adversely affect quality of life, treatment adherence, and persistence. Early discontinuation of AIs may result in an inadequate clinical response. Over-the-counter analgesics, exercise, and drug holidays are common strategies used to manage arthralgias, however few interventions are evidence-based. Patients experiencing arthralgias may experience distress and, therefore would benefit from ongoing nursing support. When caring for patients with arthralgias, nurses should assess for potential modifiable risk factors, recommend lifestyle changes and/or pharmacologic interventions, and offer ongoing education and follow-up.

Code status documentation in the outpatient electronic medical records of patients with metastatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Advanced care planning (ACP) is considered an essential component of medical care in the United States, especially in patients with incurable diseases. However, little is known about clinical practices in outpatient oncology settings related to discussing end-of-life care and documenting code status preferences in ambulatory medical records. OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of documentation of code status in the electronic longitudinal medical records (LMR) of patients with metastatic cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective review of 2,498 patients with metastatic solid tumors at an academic cancer center. An electronic patient database and the LMR were queried to identify demographic information, cancer type, number of clinic visits, and documentation of code status. PARTICIPANTS: The sample consisted of adult patients with metastatic prostate, breast, ovarian, bladder kidney, colorectal, non-colorectal gastrointestinal (GI), and lung cancers. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was the percentage of documented code status in the LMR. MAIN RESULTS: Among the 2,498 patients, 20.3% had a documented code status. Code status was designated most frequently in patients with non-colorectal GI (193/609, 31.7%) and lung (179/583, 30.7%) cancers and least frequently in patients with genitourinary malignancies [bladder/kidney (4/89, 4.5%), ovarian (4/93, 4.3%), and prostate (7/365, 1.9%) cancers]. Independent predictors of having documented code status included religious affiliation, cancer type, and a greater number of visits to the cancer center. Younger patients and black patients were less likely to be designated as DNR/DNI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the incurable nature of metastatic cancer, only a minority of patients had a code status documented in the electronic medical record.

The forgotten team member: meeting the needs of oncology support staff.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of working in an oncology setting has been widely researched for physicians, nurses, social workers, and chaplains. The experiences of nonlicensed support staff in an oncology setting have rarely been acknowledged or addressed. Few studies have addressed support or education initiatives for support staff caring for oncology patients. The intent of this study was to understand the work experiences of oncology support staff. Emotional impact, patient relationships, and team relationships were addressed. These data would help shape the development of an oncology support staff program. METHODS: A qualitative and quantitative approach was used to explore the experiences of support staff. Seven focus groups and individual interviews were conducted addressing work life in a cancer center. The quantitative survey collected baseline data on job satisfaction, working relationships, patient relationships, burnout, and support programs. RESULTS: Four predominant themes emerged from the focus groups. These included: relationships with patients and families, coping with death and dying, value and recognition, and balancing function with emotion. The quantitative survey reported the highest satisfaction with patient relationships and the lowest satisfaction with job recognition and supervisor support. High personal accomplishment scores declined with duration of employment. Educational grand rounds were a high interest. DISCUSSION: This study provides insight into the impact of caring for oncology patients on support staff. Burnout and job satisfaction can be costly. Recognizing the challenges inherent in the oncology environment is essential to supporting a successful oncology practice for licensed and nonlicensed support staff.

Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions for the management of oral mucositis.

Mucositis, an inflammation of the mucous membranes, is a commonly occurring side effect of chemotherapy and radiation. Oral mucositis can cause significant clinical consequences, such as pain, malnutrition, and local and systemic infections. Nurses have a critical role in all aspects of managing mucositis, including assessing it, teaching oral care, administering pharmacologic interventions, and helping patients cope with symptom distress. Mucositis can have a negative impact on the overall treatment experience, especially when severe pain or infections occur. Many interventions for managing mucositis exist; however, some are based in tradition or expert opinion and have not been studied in large, randomized, controlled trials. In addition, a variety of assessment tools are available, which creates confusion and difficulties when comparing interventions across studies. This article reviews empirical evidence related to interventions for oral mucositis. Oral care and rinses, pharmacologic interventions, and other techniques are evaluated. Gaps in the literature and opportunities for research, education, and practice changes are discussed.

Feasibility and validity of a one-item fatigue screen in a thoracic oncology clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in patients with advanced cancers. Despite its high prevalence, it is often unrecognized and undetected. This study assessed the feasibility and validity of a one-item fatigue scale (OIFS) in an outpatient oncology clinic. METHODS: Over a 3-month trial period, all patients in a thoracic oncology clinic were screened for fatigue with a one-item, 0 to 10 scale. Over a second trial period, an additional sample of 100 clinic patients completed validated measures of fatigue, including the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) and Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI), in addition to the OIFS. RESULTS: During the initial trial period, more than 95% of patients (574 of 600) had a documented OIFS score on their first clinic visit. Data from the second cohort of patients revealed that the OIFS had good test-retest reliability (r = 0.88) and was highly correlated with the FSI severity scale (0.87) and the FACIT-F (-0.75). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the OIFS had good discrimination compared with the FACIT-F (area under the curve = 0.87). Sensitivity and specificity of several OIFS cutoff scores were compared, and scores between 3 and 5 were found to be optimal. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a one-item scale to screen for fatigue is feasible in an ambulatory clinic setting. This scale had convergent validity with other measures of fatigue and was able to identify cases of fatigue that met criteria on the FACIT-F. These data support the recommendations in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for cancer-related fatigue screening.

Between parent and child: negotiating cancer treatment in adolescents.

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital, founded the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and sustenance to the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Cancer in adolescents presents an extra dynamic of psychosocial complexity. The case of a 19-year-old woman with acute myelocytic leukemia is discussed. Her disease was refractory to allogeneic transplantation, and she died with severe graft-versus-host disease. Ms. P and her mother established very different relationships with the team which supported them through the transitions in her care, and Ms. P was able to die at home, with hospice care. The personal connection with the team enabled a degree of positive adjustment through the nightmare of loss. The epidemiology of cancer in adolescents and paradigms of care are reviewed. Psychosocial aspects of adolescence, opportunities for personal growth and support, and the challenge of end-of-life care are discussed.