Intra- and inter-rater consistency of dual assessment by radiologist and neurologist for evaluating DWI-ASPECTS in ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the intra -and inter-rater consistency of radiologist and neurologist working in pairs attributing DWI-ASPECTS (Diffusion Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) in patients with acute middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke referred for mechanical thrombectomy, intravenous thrombolysis or bridging therapy. METHODS: Five neurologists and 5 radiologists working in pairs and in hour period scored independently and in two reading sessions anonymized DWI-ASPECTS of 80 patients presenting with acute anterior ischaemic stroke in our center. We measured agreement between pairs using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). A Fleiss kappa was used for dichotomized (0-6;7-10) and trichotomized (0-3;4-6;7-10) ASPECTS. The interrater distribution of the score in the trichotomized (0-3;4-6;7-10) ASPECTS was calculated. We determined the interrater (Cohen kappa) and intrarater (Fleiss kappa) agreement on the ASPECTS regions. RESULTS: The average DWI-ASPECTS was 6.35 (SD±2.44) for the first reading, and 6.47 (SD±2.44) for the second one. The ICC was 0.853 (95%CI, 0.798-0.896) for the interrater, and 0.862 (95%CI, 0.834-0.885) for the intrarater evaluation. Kappa coefficients were high for dichotomized (k=0.75) and trichotomized (k=0.64) ASPECTS. Evaluators agreement on the ASPECTS category (0-3), (4-6) and (7-10) was 88, 76 and 93% respectively. The anatomic region infarcted was well identified (k=0.70-0.77), except for the internal capsula (k=0.57). Interrater agreement was fair for M5 (k=0.37), moderate for internal capsula (0.52) and substantial for the other regions (0.60-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of DWI-ASPECTS is good when determined by radiologist and neurologist working in pairs, which corresponds to our current clinical practice. However, discrepancies are possible for cut-off determination, which may impact the indication of thrombectomy, and for the determination of the exact infarcted region. Agreement to propose category (4-6) is lower than for (0-3) and (8-10) ASPECTS categories.

The basal to total insulin ratio in outpatients with diabetes on basal-bolus regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the basal/total ratio of daily insulin dose (b/T) in outpatients with diabetes type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) on basal-bolus regimen, by investigating whether there is a relationship with HbA1c and episodes of hypoglycemia. METHODS: Multicentric, observational, cross-sectional study in Italy. Adult DM1 (n = 476) and DM2 (n = 541) outpatients, with eGFR >30 mL/min/1.73 m2, on a basal-bolus regimen for at least six months, were recruited from 31 Italian Diabetes services between March and September 2016. Clinicaltrials.govID: NCT03489031. RESULTS: Total daily insulin dose was significantly higher in DM2 patients (52.3 ± 22.5 vs. 46 ± 20.9 U/day), but this difference disappeared when insulin doses were normalized for body weight. The b/T ratio was lower than 0.50 in both groups: 0.46 ± 0.14 in DM1 and 0.43 ± 0.15 in DM2 patients (p = 0.0011). The b/T was significantly higher in the patients taking metformin in both groups, and significantly different according to the type of basal insulin (Degludec, 0.48 in DM1 and 0.44 in DM2; Glargine, 0.44 in DM1 and 0.43 in DM2; Detemir, 0.45 in DM1 and 0.39 in DM2). The b/T ratio was not correlated in either group to HbA1c or incidence of hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL, or requiring caregiver intervention, in the last three months). In the multivariate analysis, metformin use and age were independent predictors of the b/T ratio in both DM1 and DM2 patients, while the type of basal insulin was an independent predictor only in DM1. CONCLUSION: The b/T ratio was independent of glycemic control and incidence of hypoglycemia.

Correction to: The basal to total insulin ratio in outpatients with diabetes on basal-bolus regimen.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s40200-018-0358-2.].