Exploring diaphragm use as a potential HIV prevention strategy among women in the United States at risk.

Given the immediate need for physical cervical barrier methods like the diaphragm to protect against HIV/STIs, understanding what factors influence the acceptability of these products and how to overcome obstacles to their use is important. We explored perceptions of the diaphragm and factors that might enhance its acceptability in 25 focus groups with racially/ethnically diverse young women in the U.S. at risk for HIV/STIs (N = 140). Women believed the diaphragm has positive attributes, and most indicated they would be more likely to use the diaphragm if they were confident they could use it correctly and it protected against HIV. They also considered it messy to use and difficult to insert or remove. Findings suggest that the diaphragm could be a desirable option for pregnancy and disease prevention for some women at risk for HIV/STIs. Although disadvantages to diaphragm use were identified, many could be eliminated through changes in product design and provider intervention.

Factors associated with effective contraceptive use among a sample of Latina women.

Unintended pregnancy disproportionately affects Latina women. One factor contributing to unintended pregnancy among Latinas is the low rate of contraceptive use. This study examined correlates of effective contraceptive use among a sample of Latina women (n=202) at increased risk for HIV. In addition to traditional intrapersonal variables (i.e., perceived risk of pregnancy, motivation to avoid pregnancy), the present study examined the role of the male partner and relationship factors (i.e., relationship commitment, duration, pregnancy prevention decision-making) on contraceptive use. Participants were recruited from clinics and community locations in East Los Angeles and administered a 60-minute in-person interview. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare women who consistently used effective contraceptives (36%) to women using no method or an ineffective method. Women in relationships of 1 to 2 years were nearly 3 times more likely to use an effective contraceptive compared to women in relationships of less than 1 year (odds ratio (OR)=2.7, 95% CI 1.1, 6.7). Women were more than twice as likely to use an effective method if they reported a high level of involvement in decision-making about whether to use contraception (OR=2.3, 95% CI 1.1, 4.7) or had discussed contraception with their partner (OR=2.4, 95% CI 1.03, 5.6). This study provides additional information about the importance of male partners and relationship factors in contraceptive use among Latina women. Efforts to prevent unintended pregnancy need to address the role of relationship factors in the sexual risk and protective behaviors of Latinas.

Recruiting and retaining couples for an HIV prevention intervention: lessons learned from the PARTNERS project.

Intervening with both members of a couple has been recommended as an important strategy for human immunodeficiency virus prevention. Analyses of focus groups and in-depth interviews with project personnel involved in recruitment and retention for the Partners Against Risk-Taking: A Networking and Evaluation Research Study project identified, at the termination of the project, barriers and facilitators to recruiting couples. Barriers included logistical problems of coordinating two people's schedules, sensitivity of the topic and challenges related to recruitment efforts focused on one partner only. Strategies to overcome such barriers were to increase availability of project personnel and recruit both partners simultaneously, with recruitment teams consisting of men and women. Challenges related to recruiting and retaining couples remain significant and should be considered before undertaking couples interventions.

A randomized study of a pregnancy and disease prevention intervention for Hispanic couples.

CONTEXT: Many Hispanic women are at elevated risk for HIV infection because of the sexual behavior of their male partner. Yet, couple-based risk-reduction interventions for this population have not been developed and scientifically evaluated. METHODS: A sample of 146 Hispanic couples who received either a risk reduction intervention or the community educational standard of care were followed up at three months (men and women) and six months (women only) to measure the consistency of both condom use and effective contraceptive use, and the frequency of unprotected vaginal sex. Analyses were conducted to identify differences between the two groups at baseline and follow-up interviews, and changes over time. RESULTS: At follow-up, the two groups did not differ on any risk-related outcomes; over time, both groups increased the reported consistency of condom use and of use of effective contraceptive methods, and reduced their frequency of unprotected sex. CONCLUSIONS: If further research confirms that simply bringing couples together for a single-session, culturally appropriate risk reduction intervention helps them adopt protective behaviors, more intensive (and costly) interventions may not be necessary.