Comparison of two multimodal intramuscular anaesthetic protocols in uncooperative feline patients: effects on sedation and echocardiographic measurements.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the sedative effect, feasibility of venous angiocatheter placement and influence on heart rate (HR), systemic blood pressure (SBP) and echocardiographic variables of two multimodal anaesthetic protocols in uncooperative cats; and to compare their influence on HR, SBP and echocardiographic variables 20 mins after sedation and after elective ovariectomy. METHODS: Eighteen stray female cats randomly received intramuscular (IM) ketamine (2 mg/kg) and methadone (0.3 mg/kg) plus dexmedetomidine (7 µg/kg; group D, n = 9) or alfaxalone (2 mg/kg; group A, n = 9). A sedation score (0-15 [from none to good sedation]) was assigned at 5 mins, 10 mins, 15 mins and 20 mins after IM injection. Venous angiocatheter placement and echocardiographic examination feasibility scores (both from 0 to 3 [from very difficult to very easy]) were recorded at 20 mins. Echocardiography, HR and blood pressure measurements (Doppler and oscillometric methods) were performed at 20 mins and at the end of surgery. RESULTS: Sedation and angiocatheter feasibility scores did not differ significantly between groups (P >0.05); the feasibility score of echocardiographic examination was higher in cats in group D (P = 0.01). HR was higher in group A at 20 mins and after surgery (P <0.05). The systolic arterial pressure obtained with the Doppler method was statistically significantly higher in cats in group D than in group A at 20 mins (P = 0.01), while postoperatively there were no differences between groups. Cats in group D showed significantly higher atrial diameters (P <0.05) and slower atrial flows (P = 0.04) compared with group A; ventricular thickness and atrial function did not differ between groups (P >0.05). Most echocardiographic variables were not different at 20 mins vs postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Both protocols allowed for effective sedation; however, cats in group D presented alterations in some echocardiographic measurements; the use of alfaxalone, combined with ketamine and methadone, is recommended to obtain a reliable echocardiographic evaluation in uncooperative cats.

Ulcerative colitis and the aging-related development of colonic diverticula.

PURPOSE: Aim of this observational case-control study was to assess the prevalence, features, and risk factors of colonic diverticula in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: The data of 896 UC patients aged ≥ 30 years from Brescia IBD database were retrospectively analyzed. Individuals with colonic diverticula were identified and prevalence was compared with that of control patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after gender/age matching. A nested cohort study was then conducted among UC patients in order to define eventual association of diverticula with specific clinico-pathologic parameters. RESULTS: Prevalence of subjects with diverticula was 11.4% among 465 UC patients aged 49 years and older, significantly lower than 35.1% prevalence in control patients of same age and gender (p < 0.001). Advancing age was a significant risk factor for diverticula development in both groups. Among UC patients, a short duration and a late onset of UC were both significantly associated to the presence of diverticula. Moreover, UC patients with diverticula had a significantly lower frequency of flares per year, even if maximal flare severity and frequency of hospital admission were similar to those of subjects without diverticula. UC patients with diverticula had a trend toward more frequent extension of UC to the left colon, possibly because of their older age. The majority of those patients had few sigmoid diverticula without symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Development of colonic diverticula is substantially reduced in patients with UC, markedly among those with an early onset, a long history of inflammatory disease, and a high flare frequency. This study reinforces the hypothesis sustaining a protective role of UC against colonic diverticula.

Bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: an accessible path? Report of a case series and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Morbid obesity is an emerging problem in the inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] population. Bariatric and IBD surgeries share technical difficulties and elevated morbidity. However, nothing is known about the possibility of performing bariatric surgery in patients with a definite diagnosis of IBD. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of restrictive bariatric surgical procedures in IBD patients. METHODS: Six patients with morbid obesity and IBD were operated on with restrictive bariatric surgery and concomitant or deferred IBD surgery. We compared BMI, excess weight loss, and perioperative complications of restrictive bariatric surgery in IBD with a control group of 95 bariatric patients. We also evaluated clinical, biochemical, pharmacological, and endoscopic characteristics before and after surgery in IBD patients. RESULTS: Perioperative results, in terms of BMI, excess weight loss, and complications after restrictive bariatric surgery, were comparable between obese IBD and control patients. IBD patients experienced a significant postoperative reduction in BMI, CRP levels, WCC, and systolic blood pressure and a significant increment in hemoglobin levels. None of the patients reported signs of malabsorption. All the patients except one were able to discontinue steroids, were in endoscopic remission at 1 year, and were in clinical remission at the latest follow-up visit. Two patients halved azathioprine dosage. One patient had a postoperative clinical recurrence treated with adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery seems to be safe and effective in IBD patients. Concomitant ileocolic resection does not increase perioperative complications. Relationship between IBD and obesity remains unclear, but weight loss could be useful in the pharmacological control of IBD.

Perforating Crohn's disease: conservative and surgical treatment.

Surgery is a part of the clinical history of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) since nearly all the patients receive at least one surgical procedure. The main indication for surgery is obstruction, but 50-60% of patients present a concomitant perforating disease at surgery, and 10% of patients have a primary indication for abscess or fistula. Generally, fistulas are classified on an anatomical basis, indicating the site of origin followed by the target (i.e. ileocolic, ileovesical, etc.). Enteroenteric fistulas are frequently asymptomatic and are not always considered an indication for surgery. However, in case of bypass with severe malnutrition or bacterial overgrowth (i.e. duodenal involvement), surgery is the only option. Enterovesical, enteroureteral and enterobiliary fistulas, due to their potential for septic complications, are a definite indication for surgery. Enterogenital fistulas have an indication mainly for their impact on the quality of life. Enterocutaneous fistulas are, in most cases, a late surgical complication, and the indication and timing for treatment are due to their output volume. Abscesses may be present alone or in association with enteric fistulas. The initial approach is conservative, and a percutaneous drainage should be a good treatment or a bridge to elective surgery. Since a modern surgical approach to CD has to be minimally invasive and highly conservative whenever possible, the presence of perforating disease should be well characterized in order to plan a laparoscopic approach and to reduce the amount of resected bowel, in case combining resection and strictureplasty. Perforating CD necessitates a multidisciplinary approach involving, behind the gastroenterologist and the surgeon, the radiologist, the urologist, the gynecologist and the nutritionist in order to obtain the best tailored treatment.