ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) for measuring voice handicap in individuals with voice disorders. METHODS: This systematic review followed the recommendations of the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments. Studies that validated the VHI, analyzed the measurement properties of reliability, measurement error, or responsiveness, and had dysphonic individuals as the study population were included. The following electronic databases were searched: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The manual search was carried out on gray literature in the Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações and ProQuest Dissertation & Theses, in addition to mapping citations and consulting an expert in the field. Evidence selection, data extraction, risk of bias analysis, certainty of evidence, and good psychometric measurements were performed by two blinded and independent reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed using Fisher's transformed r-to-z correlation coefficient and standardized mean difference. Heterogeneity was calculated using Tau² and I² statistical tests in JAMOVI 2.3.2 software. RESULTS: Eighty studies were included in the meta-analysis. When assessing the risk of bias, most studies were classified as inadequate during the reliability and measurement error stages. In the responsiveness stage, they were classified as doubtful in the sensitivity and specificity sub-boxes and good in the comparison sub-box with a gold standard instrument. For psychometric properties, most studies were classified as indeterminate in terms of both reliability and responsiveness. In test-retest reliability and responsiveness, the average outcome differed significantly from zero, indicating agreement between the test and retest moments and a significant reduction in the VHI score after intervention. Considering certainty of the evidence, the level of evidence was very low in both the reliability and responsiveness stages. The analyzed studies did not evaluate observational errors, and hence, they were not considered in this review. CONCLUSION: The VHI proved to be reliable and responsive in measuring voice handicap. However, it should be used with caution, as there is heterogeneity, a risk of bias, and no adherence to the analysis of observational error.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: to map the clinical parameters used in the speech-language pathology assessment of the chronic cough. METHODS: a scoping review was performed to answer the clinical question: "What are the clinical parameters included in the speech-language pathology assessment of patients with chronic cough?" Evidence was searched by electronic and manual search. The electronic search included: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and LILACS. Each database had a specific search strategy. The manual search included Journal of Voice, Chest, and Thorax, Brazilian Library of Theses and Dissertations, Open Grey, and Clinical Trials, in addition to scanning the references of the included studies. The extracted data considered information regarding the publication, sample, assessment, and measures used when assessing chronic cough. RESULTS: the electronic search found 289 studies; the manual search found 1036 studies; 12 were selected for the present study. The most used assessments were: self-assessment (75%), aerodynamic analysis (66.67%), the perceptual auditory judgment of the voice quality (58.33%), acoustic analysis of the voice (41.67%), cough frequency, and cough threshold (41.67%) and electroglottography (25%). CONCLUSIONS: the subjective instruments were used more frequently, while specific objective instruments, which are recent, were used less frequently. Complementary assessments such as vocal assessment, have been frequently used, also, with no other parameter. A lack of homogeneity was identified in the speech-language pathology assessment and measures of patients with chronic cough, thus, the comparison among studies and clinical analysis is difficult.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the efficacy of speech-language pathology therapy in the self-assessment, in the cough frequency, and the vocal quality of adults with chronic cough. METHODS: This is a systematic review with meta-analysis that answered the clinical question: "In adults with chronic cough, what is the effect of the speech-language pathology therapy in the self-assessment, in the cough frequency, and the vocal quality, compared to another intervention?" (PROSPERO 2021/CRD42021226729). An electronic search (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Lilacs), and a manual search (Journal of Voice, Brazilian Library of Theses and Dissertations, Open Grey and Clinical Trials) with specific search strategies was performed. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials. Meta-analysis (standardized difference of means, Inverse Variance, and random effects model) and heterogeneity analysis (Chi², Tau², and I²) were performed. RESULTS: We found 610 studies and selected three. There was an uncertain risk of detection bias. The data were heterogeneous, and there was no difference between interventions in self-perception of cough severity (z = 0.09, P = 0.930; tau² = 0.65, I² = 90%) and in the self-perception of the effects of chronic cough on health status (z = 0.30, P = 0.77; tau² = 0.99, I² = 97%). The estimated mean difference was 0.97 to cough frequency, and it was differ significantly from zero (z = 4.47, P < 0.001) but the results are heterogeneous (Chi² (1) = 22.22, P < 0.001, I² = 95%). CONCLUSION: The speech-language pathology therapy had a greater effect size than the control interventions on cough frequency. However, in the subjects' perception, there were no differences between the interventions.
