ABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Virtual Training Academy (VTA) was established to rapidly develop a contact-tracing workforce for California. Through June 2021, more than 10 000 trainees enrolled in a contact-tracing or case investigation course at the VTA. To evaluate program effectiveness, we analyzed trainee pre- and postassessment results using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. There was a statistically significant (P < .001) improvement in knowledge and self-perceived skills after course completion, indicating success in training a competent contact-tracing workforce. (Am J Public Health. 2021;111(11):1934-1938. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306468).
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Contact Tracing , Program Evaluation/statistics & numerical data , Teaching , Workforce , California , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Public Health , Teaching/education , Teaching/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
California's state and local tuberculosis (TB) programs collaborated to develop the Tuberculosis Indicators Project (TIP), a program evaluation and improvement process. In TIP, local and state staff review data, identify program gaps, implement plans to improve local TB program performance, and evaluate outcomes. After 10 years of project implementation, indicator performance changes and patient outcomes were measured. Eighty-seven percent of participating programs showed a performance increase in targeted indicators after three years compared with 57% of comparison groups. Statistically significant performance change was more common in the intervention local health departments (LHDs) than in comparison groups. The most notable performance changes were in the contact investigation and case management indicators. These results indicate that this systematic evaluation and program improvement project was associated with improved LHD TB control performance and may be useful to inform improvement projects in other public health programs.
Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Government Agencies/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Tuberculosis/therapy , Antitubercular Agents/administration & dosage , California , Case Management/standards , Case Management/statistics & numerical data , Communicable Disease Control/economics , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Contact Tracing/statistics & numerical data , Government Agencies/economics , Government Agencies/standards , Humans , Program Evaluation , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/drug therapyABSTRACT
California state and local tuberculosis (TB) programs used a systematic process to develop a set of indicators to measure and improve program performance in controlling TB. These indicators were the basis for a quality improvement process known as the TB Indicators Project. Indicators were derived from guidelines and legal mandates for clinical, case management, and surveillance standards and were assessed using established criteria. The indicators were calculated using existing surveillance data. The indicator set was field tested by local programs with high TB morbidity and subsequently revised. Collaboration with key stakeholders at all stages was crucial to developing useful and accepted indicators. Data accessibility was a critical requirement for indicator implementation. Indicators most frequently targeted for performance improvement were those perceived to be amenable to intervention. Indicators based on surveillance data can complement other public health program improvement efforts by identifying program gaps and successes and monitoring performance trends.
