Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pain Pract ; 2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the routine use of radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment of chronic pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region, there remains uncertainty on the most appropriate patient selection criteria. This study aimed to develop appropriateness criteria for RF in relation to relevant patient characteristics, considering RF ablation (RFA) for the treatment of chronic axial pain and pulsed RF (PRF) for the treatment of chronic radicular pain. METHODS: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) was used to explore the opinions of a multidisciplinary European panel on the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a variety of clinical scenarios. Depending on the type of pain (axial or radicular), the expert panel rated the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a total of 219 clinical scenarios. RESULTS: For axial pain in the lumbosacral or cervical region, appropriateness of RFA was determined by the dominant pain trigger and location of tenderness on palpation with higher appropriateness scores if these variables were suggestive of the diagnosis of facet or sacroiliac joint pain. Although the opinions on the appropriateness of PRF for lumbosacral and cervical radicular pain were fairly dispersed, there was agreement that PRF is an appropriate option for well-selected patients with radicular pain due to herniated disc or foraminal stenosis, particularly in the absence of motor deficits. The panel outcomes were embedded in an educational e-health tool that also covers the psychosocial aspects of chronic pain, providing integrated recommendations on the appropriate use of (P)RF interventions for the treatment of chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary European expert panel established patient-specific recommendations that may support the (pre)selection of patients with chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region for either RFA or PRF (accessible via https://rftool.org). Future studies should validate these recommendations by determining their predictive value for the outcomes of (P)RF interventions.

2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 152(11): 1835-46, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20730457

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Localization of brain function is a fundamental requisite for the resection of eloquent-area brain tumors. Preoperative functional neuroimaging and diffusion tensor imaging can display cortical functional organization and subcortical anatomy of major white matter bundles. Direct cortical and subcortical stimulation is widely used in routine practice, however, because of its ability to reveal tissue function in eloquent regions. The role and integration of these techniques is still a matter of debate. The objective of this study was to assess surgical and functional neurological outputs of awake surgery and intraoperative cortical and subcortical electrical stimulation (CSES) and to use CSES to examine the reliability of preoperative functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking (DTI-FT) for surgical planning. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 27 patients with eloquent-area tumors who were selected to undergo awake surgery and direct brain mapping. All subjects underwent preoperative sensorimotor and language fMRI and DTI tractography of major white matter bundles. Intra- and postoperative complications, stimulation effects, extent of resection, and neurological outcome were determined. We topographically correlated intraoperatively identified sites (cortical and subcortical) with areas of fMRI activation and DTI tractography. RESULTS: Total plus subtotal resection reached 88.8%. Twenty-one patients (77.7%) suffered transient postoperative worsening, but at 6 months follow-up only three (11.1%) patients had persistent neurological impairment. Sensorimotor cortex direct mapping correlated 92.3% with fMRI activation, while direct mapping of language cortex correlated 42.8%. DTI fiber tracking underestimated the presence of functional fibers surrounding or inside the tumor. CONCLUSION: Preoperative brain mapping is useful when planning awake surgery to estimate the relationship between the tumor and functional brain regions. However, these techniques cannot directly lead the surgeon during resection. Intraoperative brain mapping is necessary for safe and maximal resection and to guarantee a satisfying neurological outcome. This multimodal approach is more aggressive, leads to better outcomes, and should be used routinely for resection of lesions in eloquent brain regions.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping/methods , Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Electrodiagnosis/methods , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Preoperative Care/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Brain Neoplasms/physiopathology , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Neurocrit Care ; 11(3): 406-10, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19636971

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study is to confirm the reliability of optic nerve ultrasound as a method to detect intracranial hypertension in patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage, to assess the reproducibility of the measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), and to verify that ONSD changes concurrently with intracranial pressure (ICP) variations. METHODS: Sixty-three adult patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (n = 34) or primary intracerebral hemorrhage (n = 29) requiring sedation and invasive ICP monitoring were enrolled in a 10-bed multivalent ICU. ONSD was measured 3 mm behind the globe through a 7.5-MHz ultrasound probe. Mean binocular ONSD was used for statistical analysis. ICP values were registered simultaneously to ultrasonography. Twenty-eight ONSDs were measured consecutively by two different observers, and interobserver differences were calculated. Twelve coupled measurements were taken before and within 1 min after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage to control elevated ICP. RESULTS: Ninety-four ONSD measurements were analyzed. 5.2 mm proved to be the optimal ONSD cut-off point to predict raised ICP (>20 mmHg) with 93.1% sensitivity (95% CI: 77.2-99%) and 73.85% specificity (95% CI: 61.5-84%). ONSD-ICP correlation coefficient was 0.7042 (95% CI for r = 0.5850-0.7936). The median interobserver ONSD difference was 0.25 mm. CSF drainage to control elevated ICP caused a rapid and significant reduction of ONSD (from 5.89 ± 0.61 to 5 ± 0.33 mm, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our investigation confirms the reliability of optic nerve ultrasound as a non-invasive method to detect elevated ICP in intracranial hemorrhage patients. ONSD measurements proved to have a good reproducibility. ONSD changes almost concurrently with CSF pressure variations.


Subject(s)
Intracranial Hypertension/diagnostic imaging , Optic Nerve/diagnostic imaging , Subarachnoid Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/standards , Adult , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Humans , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...