A three-dimensional computed tomography study of the palmar ulnar corner fragment in distal radial fractures.

Fixing palmar ulnar corner fragments of distal radial fractures can be challenging. We described the palmar ulnar corner fragment morphology in a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients who underwent preoperative wrist computed tomography scans. Palmar ulnar corner fractures were categorized based on articular cross-sectional area, sagittal angulation relative to the radius long axis, palmar cortical length, radioulnar width and associated palmar radiocarpal subluxation. Three types emerged: type 1 fragments involved 37% (SD 10) of the radiocarpal articular surface and were extended in the sagittal plane; type 2 fragments involved 28% (SD 10) of the articular surface and had a long palmar cortex, of which 57% had palmar carpal subluxation; and type 3 fragments involved 13% (SD 2) of the articular surface, had a short palmar cortex and all had palmar carpal subluxation. Understanding palmar ulnar corner fragment morphology may guide optimal reduction and fixation strategy and prevent palmar radiocarpal subluxation, especially in type 3 fractures.Level of evidence IV.

Impinging exostoses of the proximal radius: a report of two cases with distinct clinical features.

Owing to the rotatory motion of proximal radius and the closely apposed anatomic structures, cortically based osseous lesions at the level of the proximal forearm may produce symptomatic impingement. While osseous impingement onto the adjacent proximal ulna may result in limited forearm rotation, impingement on the surrounding soft-tissue structures may produce symptoms as well. Here, we describe two cases of symptomatic proximal radius exostosis, each of which produced distinct clinical symptoms. In the first case, impingement on the posterior interosseous nerve produced symptoms of radiating forearm pain and paresthesia resembling radial tunnel syndrome. In the second case, impingement of the exostosis on the distal biceps tendon resulted in painful mechanical snapping with rotation of the forearm. In both cases, symptoms rapidly improved after surgical excision.

Fix it or discard it? A retrospective analysis of functional outcomes after surgically treated patella fractures comparing ORIF with partial patellectomy.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare functional outcomes of patients with patella fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with those treated with partial patellectomy (PP). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS: Seventy-three patients with isolated displaced patella fractures underwent operative treatment between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2009, at our institution. Of these, 52 (71%) patients with isolated patella fractures with minimum 1-year follow-up agreed to participate and were enrolled in the study. INTERVENTION: PP or ORIF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Patients completed outcome questionnaires and participated in a physical examination. Outcome instruments included the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale, Short Form (SF)-36 Health Survey, and SF Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Survey. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent PP and 26 underwent ORIF. There were no significant differences in any of the functional outcome instruments, including Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ORIF: 64.1 ± 11, PP: 62.1 ± 7.9, P = 0.76), SF-36 physical component score (ORIF: 40.8 ± 5.4, PP: 41.1 ± 5.2, P = 0.94), SF-36 mental component (ORIF: 47.7 ± 5.1, PP: 51.8 ± 4.9, P = 0.19), Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) Function Index (ORIF: 28.6 ± 9.1, PP: 27.7 ± 6.7, P = 0.78), or SMFA Bother Index (ORIF: 26.0 ± 9.7, PP: 23.6 ± 8.8, P = 0.72). Complication rates did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that functional impairment persists after operative treatment of patella fractures. Both ORIF and PP demonstrated similar final range of motion, functional scores, and complication rates. Despite its purported benefits, in this study, ORIF did not result in superior outcomes compared with PP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia: intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation.

Intramedullary nailing and plate fixation represent two viable approaches to internal fixation of extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia. Although both techniques have demonstrated success in maintaining reduction and promoting stable union, they possess distinct advantages and disadvantages that require careful consideration during surgical planning. Differences in soft-tissue health and construct stability must be considered when choosing between intramedullary nailing and plating of the distal tibia. Recent advances in intramedullary nail design and plate-and-screw fixation systems have further increased the options for management of these fractures. Current evidence supports careful consideration of the risk of soft-tissue complications, residual knee pain, and fracture malalignment in the context of patient and injury characteristics in the selection of the optimal method of fixation.