ABSTRACT
Orthotopic bladder reconstruction is becoming increasingly popular in patients who have undergone radical cystectomy. One of the rare complications is spontaneous rupture, which presents with various symptoms, but in particular, abdominal pain. We report a case of orthotopic bladder perforation in a patient who presented with the symptoms and signs of small bowel obstruction.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: In this article we present our experience with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of 105 renal tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RFA was performed on 105 renal tumors in 97 patients, with a mean tumor size of 32 mm (11-68 mm). The mean patient age was 71.7 years (range, 36-89 years). The ablations were carried out under ultrasound (n = 43) or CT (n = 62) guidance. Imaging follow-up was by contrast-enhanced CT within 10 days and then at 6-monthly intervals. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine variables associated with procedural outcome. RESULTS: Eighty-three tumors were completely treated at a single sitting (79%). Twelve of the remaining tumors were successfully re-treated and a clinical decision was made not to re-treat seven patients. A patient with a small residual crescent of tumor is under follow-up and may require further treatment. In another patient, re-treatment was abandoned due to complicating pneumothorax and difficult access. One patient is awaiting further re-treatment. The overall technical success rate was 90.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size to be the only significant variable affecting procedural outcome. (p = 0.007, Pearson chi(2)) Five patients had complications. There have been no local recurrences. CONCLUSION: Our experience to date suggests that RFA is a safe and effective, minimally invasive treatment for small renal tumors.
Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Reoperation , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Interventional/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Incidental small renal-cell masses are often seen in elderly patients with significant comorbidity who are unfit to undergo major surgery. This study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of percutaneous imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation in the management of small solid renal masses, almost all of which are renal cell cancers. CONCLUSION: Early experience suggests that radiofrequency ablation is a safe, well-tolerated, and minimally invasive therapy for patients with solid renal masses. In the era of nephron-sparing surgery, radiofrequency ablation may have a role in the management of small problematic renal masses.
